FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2324363554> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2324363554 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyTransplantation and Urolithiasis1 Apr 2013V1724 ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF TISSUE INGROWTH INTO THE PROXIMAL AND DISTAL COMPONENTS OF A RESONANCE URETERAL STENT Adam Kaplan, Surendra Kolla, and Jaime Landman Adam KaplanAdam Kaplan Orange, CA More articles by this author , Surendra KollaSurendra Kolla Orange, CA More articles by this author , and Jaime LandmanJaime Landman Orange, CA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2925AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Management of ureteral obstruction in the chronically ill patient can be challenging. The Resonance stent, made of coiled Chromium, Molybdenum and Titanium alloy, can be deployed for up to 1 year in the obstructed ureter with the advantage of decreased rates of infection and encrustation. We noted tissue ingrowth into the proximal and distal curls of a Resonance stent. METHODS A 75 year old man with multiple comorbidities and a ureteral obstruction was managed with a Resonance ureteral stent. The stent, which upon deployment was in pristine position, had migrated into the proximal ureter. The stent exchange was complicated by significant ingrowth of ureteral urothelium into the proximal and distal coils of the stent. We removed the stent using a minimally invasive endourologic technique. RESULTS The overlying urothelium of the proximal coil was visualized with a flexible ureteroscope and gently incised with a holmium laser. The distal end of the stent was released from tissue ingrowth with passage of a 9-11 35-cm ureteral access sheath over the Resonance stent. This technique would not free the proximal coil. As such, under direct vision, the Resonance stent was incised with the laser in two places for removal of the distal coil and shaft. After removal of this component, improved access to the proximal coil allowed for removal of two residual proximal coil fragments without harm to the renal collecting system. CONCLUSIONS Resonance stent placement is rarely complicated by tissue ingrowth. Tissue ingrowth may have been a function of the immobility of the stent due to proximal migration. We demonstrate an endoscopic technique for removal of the Resonance stent in its entirety. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e708-e709 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Adam Kaplan Orange, CA More articles by this author Surendra Kolla Orange, CA More articles by this author Jaime Landman Orange, CA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2324363554 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2324363554 creator A5023292830 @default.
• W2324363554 creator A5055143542 @default.
• W2324363554 creator A5082924158 @default.
• W2324363554 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2324363554 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2324363554 title "V1724 ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF TISSUE INGROWTH INTO THE PROXIMAL AND DISTAL COMPONENTS OF A RESONANCE URETERAL STENT" @default.
• W2324363554 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2925" @default.
• W2324363554 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2324363554 type Work @default.
• W2324363554 sameAs 2324363554 @default.
• W2324363554 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2324363554 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2324363554 hasAuthorship W2324363554A5023292830 @default.
• W2324363554 hasAuthorship W2324363554A5055143542 @default.
• W2324363554 hasAuthorship W2324363554A5082924158 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C2777540882 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C2779762690 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C96618477 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConcept C989437 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C105702510 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C126838900 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C141071460 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C143409427 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C2776664737 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C2777540882 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C2778583881 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C2779762690 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C2780653459 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C71924100 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C96618477 @default.
• W2324363554 hasConceptScore W2324363554C989437 @default.
• W2324363554 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2324363554 hasLocation W23243635541 @default.
• W2324363554 hasOpenAccess W2324363554 @default.
• W2324363554 hasPrimaryLocation W23243635541 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2021019069 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2056241453 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2374124747 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2593011982 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2784151091 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2806325714 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W2897536632 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W4237899154 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W4296581813 @default.
• W2324363554 hasRelatedWork W4308319100 @default.
• W2324363554 hasVolume "189" @default.
• W2324363554 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2324363554 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2324363554 magId "2324363554" @default.
• W2324363554 workType "article" @default.