FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2325741694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2325741694 endingPage "1002" @default.
• W2325741694 startingPage "998" @default.
• W2325741694 abstract "The aim of our study was to evaluate and check (analyze and compare the results) the complications of patients with benign parotid disease reconstructed with the 3 reconstructive techniques used after the removal of benign tumors of the parotid gland treated at our institution. The reconstruction of this anatomical region may include the use of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap, flap of sternocleidomastoid muscle, and temporoparietal fascia flap to prevent aesthetic and functional complications.We carried out a retrospective review of 224 patients operated on between February 2002 and March 2009 with benign primary parotid tumors. Extracapsular dissection or superficial parotidectomy was performed and then these patients were reconstructed with the 3 techniques that we used to apply at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery in the University Federico 2 of Naples: the SMAS flap, flap of sternocleidomastoid muscle, and temporoparietal fascia flap. The statistical difference between the extracapsular dissection versus superficial parotidectomy and the statistical difference between the 3 types of flaps as concerns evaluated recurrence rate and complications were measured with the χ test. The chosen level of statistical significance was P less than 0.05.Out of the 224 enrolled patients, 103 were women and 121 men, with an average age of 54 years. After histopathological examination, 136 adenomas and 88 cystadenoma lymphomas were diagnosed. Enucleoresection was the surgical technique adopted in 169 cases while superficial parotidectomy was used in the remaining 55 cases. The reconstruction was performed with SMAS flap in 122 patients, with muscle flap SMC in 66 patients and temporoparietal fascia flap in 36 patients. Table 1 shows that no significant differences as concerns hematoma and wound infection were observed after extracapsular dissection and superficial parotidectomy(1.8% vs.1.8% [P > 0.05] and 1.8% vs. 5.5% [P > 0.05]). Transient facial nerve weakness, fistula, dip skin, Frey syndrome, spinal nerve injury, and facial paralysis were significantly more frequent after superficial parotidectomy than after extracapsular dissection (4.1% vs. 27.3% [P < 0.001], 1.8% vs. 10.9% [P < 0.001], 3% vs. 12.7% [P < 0.001], 0% vs. 5.5% [P < 0.001], 0% vs. 3.6% [P < 0.001], and 0% vs. 9.1% [P < 0.001], respectively). Table 3 shows that the presence of Frey syndrome is statistically significant in the first 2 comparisons, group I against group IV and group II against group V, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). And in the first comparison between group I and IV, there was a statistically significant presence of transient facial nerve weakness (P < 0.001), fistula (P < 0.001), dip skin (P < 0.05), and facial paralysis (P < 0.001). In the second comparison between group II and group V besides the presence of Frey syndrome, there is also a statistically significant presence of transient facial nerve weakness (P < 0.05), skin depression (P < 0.05), accessory spinal nerve injury (P < 0. 01), and facial paralysis (P < 0.01). In the comparison between the third and the sixth group, there is a statistically significant presence of transient facial nerve weakness (P < 0.05), fistula (P < 0.01), and facial paralysis(P < 0.05).Extracapsular dissection showed similar effectiveness and fewer side effects than superficial parotidectomy, and the 3 reconstruction techniques used in this trial drastically reduce the occurrence of post-parotidectomy Frey syndrome and greatly reduce functional and aesthetic complications." @default.
• W2325741694 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2325741694 creator A5008760203 @default.
• W2325741694 creator A5024356726 @default.
• W2325741694 creator A5029972222 @default.
• W2325741694 creator A5036201540 @default.
• W2325741694 creator A5075091851 @default.
• W2325741694 date "2014-05-01" @default.
• W2325741694 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2325741694 title "Reconstructive Techniques of the Parotid Region" @default.
• W2325741694 cites W1975234301 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W1979757050 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W1990353491 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W1991765739 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2000281390 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2007107327 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2007429366 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2033139415 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2033144011 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2047096752 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2051795356 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2065686288 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2071964689 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2075392330 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2077310138 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2078019458 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2090950454 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2112960057 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2126007770 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2170185515 @default.
• W2325741694 cites W2988729466 @default.
• W2325741694 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000000664" @default.
• W2325741694 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24705234" @default.
• W2325741694 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2325741694 type Work @default.
• W2325741694 sameAs 2325741694 @default.
• W2325741694 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942016 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942018 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942019 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942020 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942021 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942022 @default.
• W2325741694 countsByYear W23257416942023 @default.
• W2325741694 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2325741694 hasAuthorship W2325741694A5008760203 @default.
• W2325741694 hasAuthorship W2325741694A5024356726 @default.
• W2325741694 hasAuthorship W2325741694A5029972222 @default.
• W2325741694 hasAuthorship W2325741694A5036201540 @default.
• W2325741694 hasAuthorship W2325741694A5075091851 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C2778987478 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C2779302907 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C2780395140 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C2781223772 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C141071460 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C167135981 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C199343813 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C2775862295 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C2778987478 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C2779302907 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C2780395140 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C2781223772 @default.
• W2325741694 hasConceptScore W2325741694C71924100 @default.
• W2325741694 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2325741694 hasLocation W23257416941 @default.
• W2325741694 hasLocation W23257416942 @default.
• W2325741694 hasOpenAccess W2325741694 @default.
• W2325741694 hasPrimaryLocation W23257416941 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W2146566567 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W2375517896 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W2376868361 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W2470355675 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W2923504908 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W4213352290 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W4282923908 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W4285405187 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W4293560499 @default.
• W2325741694 hasRelatedWork W4296179925 @default.
• W2325741694 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2325741694 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2325741694 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2325741694 magId "2325741694" @default.
• W2325741694 workType "article" @default.