FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2326024118> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2326024118 abstract "Objectives To summarise the available evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological therapies including dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Data sources Electronic databases were searched up to March 2005. Review methods Relevant studies were assessed using standard checklists and data were abstracted by two reviewers using standardised forms. Separate economic evaluations were undertaken for six selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Cost-effectiveness was assessed in terms of cost per parasuicide event avoided in all six trials and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in four of them. All results are at 2003-4 prices and for 12 months follow-up. Results Nine RCTs and one non-RCT of moderate to poor quality were identified in the clinical effectiveness review. They provided some evidence that DBT is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) for the treatment of chronically parasuicidal and drug-dependent borderline women; that DBT-orientated therapy is more effective than client-centred therapy (CCT) for the treatment of BPD; and that DBT is as effective as comprehensive validation therapy plus 12-Step for the treatment of opioid-dependent borderline women. There was also some evidence that partial hospitalisation is more effective than TAU in the treatment of BPD, good evidence that manual-assisted cognitive behavioural therapy (MACT) is no more effective than TAU in the treatment of BPD and some evidence that interpersonal group therapy is no more effective than individual mentalisation-based partial hospitalisation (MBT) for the treatment of BPD. However, these results should be interpreted with caution as not all studies were primarily targeted to borderline symptoms and there were considerable differences between the studies. The assessment of cost-effectiveness found a mix of results in the four trials of DBT, along with the high levels of uncertainty and the limitations in the analyses. The findings do not support the cost-effectiveness of DBT though they suggest it has the potential to be cost-effective. The results for MBT are promising, though again surrounded by a high degree of uncertainty and for MACT, the analysis suggests that the intervention is unlikely to be cost-effective. Conclusions The overall efficacy of psychological therapies is promising; however, at this stage the evidence is inconclusive. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention in six RCTs examined, however, does not support the cost-effectiveness of DBT although potential is suggested. There is a need for considerable research in this area. This research should involve appropriately powered head-to-head RCTs of psychological therapies; a survey of current practice and the use of the full range of services by people with BPD to inform future economic analyses; full resource-use data collected in the context of pragmatic clinical trials; psychometric assessment of the validity of the EQ-5D or other generic and condition-specific preference-based measures in BPD, and the development of a more formal cost-effectiveness model using the above data." @default.
• W2326024118 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5009458237 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5021954458 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5027006073 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5046311607 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5047089656 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5050268859 @default.
• W2326024118 creator A5070774015 @default.
• W2326024118 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W2326024118 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2326024118 title "Psychological therapies including dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and preliminary economic evaluation" @default.
• W2326024118 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta10350" @default.
• W2326024118 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16959171" @default.
• W2326024118 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2326024118 type Work @default.
• W2326024118 sameAs 2326024118 @default.
• W2326024118 citedByCount "118" @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182012 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182013 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182014 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182015 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182016 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182017 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182018 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182019 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182020 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182021 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182022 @default.
• W2326024118 countsByYear W23260241182023 @default.
• W2326024118 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5009458237 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5021954458 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5027006073 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5046311607 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5047089656 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5050268859 @default.
• W2326024118 hasAuthorship W2326024118A5070774015 @default.
• W2326024118 hasBestOaLocation W23260241181 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C2778805329 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C2780600973 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C2909088125 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C118552586 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C15744967 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C17744445 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C177713679 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C187288502 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C189708586 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C199539241 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C2778805329 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C2779473830 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C2780600973 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C2909088125 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C542102704 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C558461103 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C70410870 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C71924100 @default.
• W2326024118 hasConceptScore W2326024118C77805123 @default.
• W2326024118 hasFunder F4320334661 @default.
• W2326024118 hasIssue "35" @default.
• W2326024118 hasLocation W23260241181 @default.
• W2326024118 hasOpenAccess W2326024118 @default.
• W2326024118 hasPrimaryLocation W23260241181 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W1968852454 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W1977685729 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W2028347139 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W2062717982 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W2156343798 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W2334078894 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W2913611312 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W4206502565 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W4254168890 @default.
• W2326024118 hasRelatedWork W4254206251 @default.
• W2326024118 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2326024118 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2326024118 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2326024118 magId "2326024118" @default.
• W2326024118 workType "article" @default.