Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2326908594> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2326908594 abstract "Aim of the study: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common diseases for the elderly with 60–80% of all dementia patients. By 2030 it is predicted that the number of people suffering from AD will increase to 65.7 million. With this increase, also the costs are going to rise. In 2010 the worldwide costs of dementia are estimated to US$604 billion. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review on pharmacoeconomic studies of drug treatment options in patients with AD. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed including a time frame from January 1st 2007 to July 15th 2010, based on a previous systematic review by Oremus (2008) until the year 2007. Results: Finally, 7 articles out of 2067 were included in this systematic review. Four different groups of medication have to be compared. The ICER in the group of patients treated with donepezil vs. no drug treatment ranges from -19,064.30 €/QALY to 281,416.13 €/QALY. Patients treated with donepezil vs. placebo show an ICER with a range of a dominant value (not specified) up to 20,866.77 €/QALY. Memantine in addition to the treatment with donepezil shows a Range of ICER from -26,094.60 €/QALY up to 6,818.33 €/QALY. The ICER of memantine monotherapy ranges between -66,978.94 €/QALY to 63,087.20 €/QALY. The economic evaluation of galantamine in comparison to usual care without any AD drugs shows an ICER in the range of 1,894.70 €/QALY to 6,953 €/QALY. Conclusion: The 7 identified publications underline that the treatment of CEIs or memantine in patients with AD is reasonable. Treatment with these drugs in most cases, depending on different assumptions and modulation of variables in sensitivity analysis, seems to be a cost effective strategy or even a cost saving strategy. The comparability of results regarding different economic evaluations is limited because of different assumptions methods used." @default.
- W2326908594 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2326908594 creator A5027144240 @default.
- W2326908594 creator A5031499456 @default.
- W2326908594 creator A5036520519 @default.
- W2326908594 creator A5054544283 @default.
- W2326908594 creator A5070250060 @default.
- W2326908594 date "2011-08-01" @default.
- W2326908594 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2326908594 title "Economic Evaluations of Treatment Options in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease – A Systematic Review" @default.
- W2326908594 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1283587" @default.
- W2326908594 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2326908594 type Work @default.
- W2326908594 sameAs 2326908594 @default.
- W2326908594 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2326908594 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2326908594 hasAuthorship W2326908594A5027144240 @default.
- W2326908594 hasAuthorship W2326908594A5031499456 @default.
- W2326908594 hasAuthorship W2326908594A5036520519 @default.
- W2326908594 hasAuthorship W2326908594A5054544283 @default.
- W2326908594 hasAuthorship W2326908594A5070250060 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2776332859 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2779056891 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2779484449 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C2780904820 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C126322002 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C142724271 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C17744445 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C187212893 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C189708586 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C199539241 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C204787440 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C27081682 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2776332859 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2779056891 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2779134260 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2779473830 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2779483572 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2779484449 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C2780904820 @default.
- W2326908594 hasConceptScore W2326908594C71924100 @default.
- W2326908594 hasIssue "08/09" @default.
- W2326908594 hasLocation W23269085941 @default.
- W2326908594 hasOpenAccess W2326908594 @default.
- W2326908594 hasPrimaryLocation W23269085941 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W1979069737 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W2411481951 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W2973445489 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W3016022069 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W3114802067 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W4230541412 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W4250918915 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W4310256554 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W4312197339 @default.
- W2326908594 hasRelatedWork W3127387047 @default.
- W2326908594 hasVolume "73" @default.
- W2326908594 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2326908594 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2326908594 magId "2326908594" @default.
- W2326908594 workType "article" @default.