FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2327157028> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2327157028 abstract "Event Abstract Back to Event Do Morphologically Distinct Projection Neurons in the Honey Bee Antennal Lobe Spike Differently? Anneke Meyer1*, Martin Brill2, Wolfgang Rössler2 and Martin P. Nawrot1 1 Freie Universität Berlin, Germany 2 Universität Würzburg, Germany It is widely acknowledged that a neurons function is reflected in both, its morphology and its electro-physiological properties. However it is very difficult to conclude from either of these two characteristics to the other one. In a previous study [1] we employed semi-supervised hierarchical clustering to explore spiking properties which most effectively describe differences between local neurons (LNs) and projection neurons (PNs) in the honey bee antennal lobe (AL).Here we used the same approach to explore differences between two types of PNs. These morphologically similar neuron families leave the AL via different tracts, the lateral (l-APT PNs) and the medial Antenno Protocerebral Tract (m-APT PNs). The existence of these two separated pathways suggests functional differences between its neurons. But is this assumption supported by systematic differences in electrophysiological features? And if so, which features are most helpful to separate m-APT PNs from l-APT PNs? We analyzed data from 122 extracellularly recorded AL units which, based on electrode placement were unambiguously identified as belonging to the m- or the l-APT [2]. For each unit well established measures of electrophysiological activity were estimated. We explored clustering of units based on the principal components (PCs) of every possible combination of these measures. Using hierarchical clustering with wards-linkage we determined which combination of measures performed best in separating l-APT units and m-APT units from each other. We repeated the same clustering routine on the original data, without prior principal component analysis. We find that clustering of l-APT units and m-APT units by means of electrophysiological features performs rather poor (~36% above chance level) as compared to cluster results between .LNs and PNs (~81 above chance level). The properties which contributed most to the separation of units from different tracts were the mean evoked rate within a response window, Fano-factor, and a units lifetime sparseness (reflecting odour tuning). Repetition of the analysis without PC-transformation of physiological measures led to the same result, albeit with a reduced classification performance (34% above chance level without vs. 39% with PCA Electrophysiological properties of units from the l-APT and the m-APT appear far more similar than those of LNs and PNs as a whole. In agreement with our results, many recent experimental findings have repeatedly indicated difficulties to differentiate physiological properties of l-PNs and m-PNs [2, 3, 4].What has been described often a times phenomenologicaly, are differences in odour tuning, firing frequency and sometimes rate profiles. These phenomena are well captured in those features that were identified as best separators: life time sparseness, Fano-factor and evoked Rate. Taken together, our quantitative results seem to confirm the qualitative experience. Acknowledgements Funding was received from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through grant 01GQ0941 to the Bernstein Focus Neuronal Basis of Learning (BFNL) and the Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft (DFG) SPP 1392 (RO 1177/5-1). References [1] Meyer A, Galizia C and Nawrot MP (2011). A spiking point of view - Is it possible to predict a neurons morphology from its electrophysiological activity?.Front. Comput. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: BC11 : Computational Neuroscience & Neurotechnology Bernstein Conference. [2] Brill MF, Meyer A, Nawrot MP and Rössler WJ (2012). Parallel processing within a dual olfactory pathway in the honeybee. Control/Tracking Number: 2012-S-5360-SfN , [3] Carcaud J, Hill T, Giurfa M and Sandoz JC (2012). Differential coding by two olfactory subsystems in the honey bee brain. J Neurophysiol. 2012 May 9 [4] Krofczik S, Menzel R and Nawrot MP (2008). Rapid odor processing in the honeybee antennal lobe network. Front Comput Neurosci. 2008;2:9 Keywords: Electrophysiology, Hirarchical Clustering, Honey bee, projection neurons Conference: Bernstein Conference 2012, Munich, Germany, 12 Sep - 14 Sep, 2012. Presentation Type: Poster Topic: Data analysis, machine learning, neuroinformatics Citation: Meyer A, Brill M, Rössler W and Nawrot MP (2012). Do Morphologically Distinct Projection Neurons in the Honey Bee Antennal Lobe Spike Differently?. Front. Comput. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Bernstein Conference 2012. doi: 10.3389/conf.fncom.2012.55.00096 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 11 May 2012; Published Online: 12 Sep 2012. * Correspondence: Dr. Anneke Meyer, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, anneke.meyer@uni-konstanz.de Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Anneke Meyer Martin Brill Wolfgang Rössler Martin P Nawrot Google Anneke Meyer Martin Brill Wolfgang Rössler Martin P Nawrot Google Scholar Anneke Meyer Martin Brill Wolfgang Rössler Martin P Nawrot PubMed Anneke Meyer Martin Brill Wolfgang Rössler Martin P Nawrot Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page." @default.
• W2327157028 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2327157028 creator A5075805357 @default.
• W2327157028 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2327157028 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2327157028 title "Do Morphologically Distinct Projection Neurons in the Honey Bee Antennal Lobe Spike Differently?" @default.
• W2327157028 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fncom.2012.55.00096" @default.
• W2327157028 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2327157028 type Work @default.
• W2327157028 sameAs 2327157028 @default.
• W2327157028 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2327157028 countsByYear W23271570282013 @default.
• W2327157028 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2327157028 hasAuthorship W2327157028A5075805357 @default.
• W2327157028 hasBestOaLocation W23271570281 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C185263204 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C2777876421 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C2780050217 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C2781390188 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C73555534 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C92835128 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConcept C94487597 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C105702510 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C11413529 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C115903868 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C154945302 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C169760540 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C185263204 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C2777876421 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C2780050217 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C2781390188 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C41008148 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C57493831 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C73555534 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C86803240 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C92835128 @default.
• W2327157028 hasConceptScore W2327157028C94487597 @default.
• W2327157028 hasLocation W23271570281 @default.
• W2327157028 hasOpenAccess W2327157028 @default.
• W2327157028 hasPrimaryLocation W23271570281 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W1532782337 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2007990565 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2014112809 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2028985168 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2060363363 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2141282666 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2149579552 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W2465988040 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W3136635931 @default.
• W2327157028 hasRelatedWork W4324327005 @default.
• W2327157028 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2327157028 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2327157028 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2327157028 magId "2327157028" @default.
• W2327157028 workType "article" @default.