FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2327343707> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2327343707 endingPage "A216" @default.
• W2327343707 startingPage "A216.1" @default.
• W2327343707 abstract "Introduction Sphincter of oddi dysfunction (SOD) is difficult to diagnose and treat. Biliary manometry is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing SOD but is not widely available. A significant number of patients, that we think are likely to have sphincter oddi dysfunction, present to our hospitals with recurrent upper abdominal pain. They have multiple investigations, recurrent A+E attendances and repeated admissions without a clear diagnosis or definitive treatment. Our aim was to identify this patient group in order to streamline their investigations and allow definitive treatment at an early stage, prevent readmission and save resources. Methods A retrospective case note review of patients across three hospitals in South Yorkshire, in whom the final diagnosis was SOD based on their clinical presentation and investigations. Results We reviewed 40 case notes in total. 88% of patients were female with a median patient age of 40 (18–75 years) Patients on average presented to A+E 6 times (0–50), median number of inpatient admissions was 4 (0–20) with additional outpatient clinic appointments. 70% (28/40) of patients have previously undergone cholecystectomy, with 100% continuing to have similar pain to that prior to surgery. The most common provisional diagnosis at presentation was bile duct stones (38%). Median duration of symptoms was 3 years (range 5 months-23 years). 35% (14/40) of patients initially presented to the surgeons. 100% of patient had abdominal USS (1–5) and 63% had undergone at least one OGD. All patients had a MRCP (range 1–4), 17 (43%) patients had a CT abdomen (0–4) and 12 (30%) patients underwent a HIDA scan. Patients were categorised into SOD type 1 (22%), type 2 (56%) or type 3 (22%) on their clinical presentation and investigations. 28% (7/40) of patient had a trial of Botox, 48% (19/40) underwent ERCP and biliary sphincterotomy with 53% (10/19) having symptomatic improvement. The remainder were managed on medial therapy. Conclusion There is a significant group of patients, who have recurrent abdominal pain, recurrent admissions, undergo multiple investigations and trials of medical therapy without a definitive diagnosis being made. In addition, these patients are often subjected to invasive interventions such as ERCP and sphincterotomy with the potential risk of serious complications. This audit highlights the need for a designated service to streamline work-up and management of these patients: both to reduce cost and to improve outcomes. Competing interests None declared." @default.
• W2327343707 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2327343707 creator A5033692000 @default.
• W2327343707 creator A5033995791 @default.
• W2327343707 creator A5039104549 @default.
• W2327343707 creator A5081721319 @default.
• W2327343707 creator A5087115048 @default.
• W2327343707 date "2012-05-28" @default.
• W2327343707 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2327343707 title "PTU-078 Delays in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected sphincter of oddi dysunction" @default.
• W2327343707 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.78" @default.
• W2327343707 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2327343707 type Work @default.
• W2327343707 sameAs 2327343707 @default.
• W2327343707 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2327343707 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2327343707 hasAuthorship W2327343707A5033692000 @default.
• W2327343707 hasAuthorship W2327343707A5033995791 @default.
• W2327343707 hasAuthorship W2327343707A5039104549 @default.
• W2327343707 hasAuthorship W2327343707A5081721319 @default.
• W2327343707 hasAuthorship W2327343707A5087115048 @default.
• W2327343707 hasBestOaLocation W23273437071 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2776884468 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2777891700 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2780877482 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2780892919 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C2780955771 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C141071460 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2776641081 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2776884468 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2777601897 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2777891700 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2780877482 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2780892919 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C2780955771 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C61434518 @default.
• W2327343707 hasConceptScore W2327343707C71924100 @default.
• W2327343707 hasIssue "Suppl 2" @default.
• W2327343707 hasLocation W23273437071 @default.
• W2327343707 hasLocation W23273437072 @default.
• W2327343707 hasOpenAccess W2327343707 @default.
• W2327343707 hasPrimaryLocation W23273437071 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W1977342301 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W1991597965 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2060661110 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2063477333 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2081661666 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2085492722 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2129274506 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2405994713 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W2536823995 @default.
• W2327343707 hasRelatedWork W3031953829 @default.
• W2327343707 hasVolume "61" @default.
• W2327343707 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2327343707 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2327343707 magId "2327343707" @default.
• W2327343707 workType "article" @default.