FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2327882694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2327882694 abstract "ABSTRACT In a technology intensive industry like ours – Petroleum Industry, Technology is acquired for commercial benefits, technical enhancement, environment protection and the like. Mechanisms to acquire technology include collaboration, consultancy, pilot project execution, membership with professional bodies. Majority of the Organizations are accountable to shareholders, partners, public and Governments to prove commercial prudence of its actions. Therefore, it is necessary for the Organizations to ensure and establish through documented process that best value of the invested cost has been achieved. Organizations are also ethically and procedurally bound to provide level playing field to all potential technology providers. To comply with these commercial obligations, tendering process is often mandatory. Tendering process in its different variants has proved successful, robust and is time tested. Therefore, whatever mechanism (collaboration, consultancy, pilot project etc.) we use, it often becomes necessary to acquire technology through tendering process due to commercial obligations. While tendering process has evolved and proves successful for acquisition of all kind of Services and Works, it poses challenges when we attempt to acquire technology through tendering because Technology acquisition has unique characteristics and attributes which do not align with principles of contracting. There exist various technologies with their own pros and cons for similar objective. They have different kind of deliverables and processes. Risk and benefits associated with technologies vary. Some technologies being in nascent stage cannot be relied for assured success but still, to update and upgrade Organization's technical capabilities it is necessary to give them a try. Sometimes it is the Organization that desires to try such nascent technology and sometimes the technology provider solicits to try their technology. Some of the technologies are patented and have the risk of landing up with single source in future and thus have risk of commercial exploitation. Often technology providers have apprehensions to submit bids when invited through tendering. What if after collecting all information and their method statement the tender is cancelled and the tender is re-issued exposing them to compete with conventional technologies or cheap technologies. Usually they are confident of superiority of Technology but are skeptical about commercial competitiveness. Therefore the technology providers often feel that participation in tendering process shall defeat the very purpose of prompting the Organizations to try their technology. Technology providers include non profit making organization and academic institutions who are not comfortable with complex tender conditions. They get discouraged by tendering process. The technical professionals are always very enthusiastic to try new technology and have focused objective to try and evaluate new technology. Technical fraternity is put off by procedural complexities due to commercial obligations. I call it procedural complexities because acquisition of technology is not an established and well understood stereotype tendering exercise. Each acquisition of technology is unique and has permutations and combination of factors mentioned above. An attempt has been made in this paper to analyze issues mentioned above and to discuss various ways to address them. Thus minimize the gap between expectations of Technical Fraternity and Commercial obligations of the Organizations" @default.
• W2327882694 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2327882694 creator A5025986083 @default.
• W2327882694 date "2015-10-11" @default.
• W2327882694 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2327882694 title "Acquiring Technology Through Tendering- Challenges" @default.
• W2327882694 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/175399-ms" @default.
• W2327882694 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2327882694 type Work @default.
• W2327882694 sameAs 2327882694 @default.
• W2327882694 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2327882694 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2327882694 hasAuthorship W2327882694A5025986083 @default.
• W2327882694 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2327882694 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2327882694 hasConceptScore W2327882694C144133560 @default.
• W2327882694 hasConceptScore W2327882694C41008148 @default.
• W2327882694 hasLocation W23278826941 @default.
• W2327882694 hasOpenAccess W2327882694 @default.
• W2327882694 hasPrimaryLocation W23278826941 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W1828039823 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2168339940 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2248584218 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2350439981 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2366721409 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2373330752 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2376062200 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2380482932 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2386903078 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2393817691 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2964773683 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2976225082 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W3004161507 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W3006089179 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W3031992357 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W3081216137 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W369530892 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W620572526 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2293520939 @default.
• W2327882694 hasRelatedWork W2992565050 @default.
• W2327882694 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2327882694 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2327882694 magId "2327882694" @default.
• W2327882694 workType "article" @default.