FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2328282364> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2328282364 endingPage "781" @default.
• W2328282364 startingPage "781" @default.
• W2328282364 abstract "Objective The primary aim was to compare directly the effectiveness of percutaneous drainage versus surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in unselected patients. The authors also wished to identify factors that may predict a successful outcome with percutaneous drainage. Summary Background Data Pancreatic pseudocysts are a common complication of pancreatitis, and recent data suggest that many pseudocysts may be observed or treated successfully by percutaneous drainage. Failures with percutaneous drainage have been recognized increasingly, and a direct comparison of percutaneous and surgical treatment was initiated to identify factors that may affect outcome with these approaches. Methods A computerized index search of the medical records of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst was performed from 1984 to 1995. One hundred seventy-three patients were identified retrospectively and assigned to treatment groups: observation (n = 41), percutaneous drainage (n = 66), or surgical treatment (n = 66). Data on demographics, clinical presentation, pseudocyst etiology and characteristics, diagnostic evaluation, management, and outcome were obtained. Treatment failure was defined as persistence of a symptomatic pseudocyst or the need for additional intervention other than the original treatment. Results The etiology of pancreatitis, clinical presentation, and diagnostic evaluation did not differ between groups. Twenty-seven percent had documented chronic pancreatitis, and the etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol in 61% of patients. Mean pseudocyst size was 4.2 ± 1 cm, 8.2 ± 1.1 cm, and 7.4 ± 1.3 cm in the observed, percutaneously treated, and surgically treated groups, respectively. Expectant treatment was successful in 93% of patients. Percutaneous drainage was successful in 42% of patients, whereas surgical treatment resulted in a success rate of 88%. Patients treated by percutaneous drainage had a higher mortality rate (16% vs. 0%), a higher incidence of complications (64% vs. 27%), and a longer hospital stay (45 ± 5 days vs. 18 ± 2 days) than patients treated by surgery. Eighty-seven percent of patients in whom percutaneous drainage failed required surgical salvage therapy. Multiple logistic regression analysis failed to reveal any factors significantly associated with a successful outcome after percutaneous drainage. Conclusions Percutaneous drainage results in higher mortality and morbidity rates and a longer hospital stay than surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. The clinical benefit of percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in unselected patients has not been realized, and the role of this treatment should be established in a clinical trial." @default.
• W2328282364 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2328282364 creator A5041245842 @default.
• W2328282364 creator A5041619633 @default.
• W2328282364 creator A5056627737 @default.
• W2328282364 creator A5078413086 @default.
• W2328282364 date "1999-06-01" @default.
• W2328282364 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2328282364 title "Percutaneous Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts Is Associated With a Higher Failure Rate Than Surgical Treatment in Unselected Patients" @default.
• W2328282364 cites W186411427 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W1967514320 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W1982903950 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W1985045980 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W1985885526 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W1990685077 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2014711165 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W20151789 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2045887413 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2059747609 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2062592207 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2065463515 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2073457057 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2075245771 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2111170545 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2242880303 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2406432356 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2413831618 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W4244367830 @default.
• W2328282364 cites W2418892707 @default.
• W2328282364 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199906000-00004" @default.
• W2328282364 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1420824" @default.
• W2328282364 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10363891" @default.
• W2328282364 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2328282364 type Work @default.
• W2328282364 sameAs 2328282364 @default.
• W2328282364 citedByCount "136" @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642012 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642013 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642014 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642015 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642016 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642017 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642018 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642019 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642020 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642021 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642022 @default.
• W2328282364 countsByYear W23282823642023 @default.
• W2328282364 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2328282364 hasAuthorship W2328282364A5041245842 @default.
• W2328282364 hasAuthorship W2328282364A5041619633 @default.
• W2328282364 hasAuthorship W2328282364A5056627737 @default.
• W2328282364 hasAuthorship W2328282364A5078413086 @default.
• W2328282364 hasBestOaLocation W23282823642 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C137627325 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2776670229 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2776737053 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2778764654 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2779763456 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C126322002 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C137627325 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C141071460 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2775967933 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2776670229 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2776737053 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2778764654 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2779763456 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C2780813298 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C71924100 @default.
• W2328282364 hasConceptScore W2328282364C81182388 @default.
• W2328282364 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2328282364 hasLocation W23282823641 @default.
• W2328282364 hasLocation W23282823642 @default.
• W2328282364 hasLocation W23282823643 @default.
• W2328282364 hasLocation W23282823644 @default.
• W2328282364 hasOpenAccess W2328282364 @default.
• W2328282364 hasPrimaryLocation W23282823641 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W1516922147 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W200899755 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2034735995 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2113169582 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2328282364 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2353003471 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2371817007 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W2413957002 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W4310976806 @default.
• W2328282364 hasRelatedWork W816070690 @default.
• W2328282364 hasVolume "229" @default.
• W2328282364 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2328282364 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2328282364 magId "2328282364" @default.
• W2328282364 workType "article" @default.