FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2328465984> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2328465984 endingPage "192" @default.
• W2328465984 startingPage "192" @default.
• W2328465984 abstract "Braun and Gomez (1966) studied effects of two faking sets on Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) scores. Scores were significantly decreased on Neuroticism (N) and significantly increased on Lie (L) under both sets. Attempt-to-conceal-faking set produced significantly smaller increases in L at the cost of significantly smaller decreases in N. Extraversion (E) scores were not significantly changed by either set. Star (1962) found that an ideal-self set significantly increased E scores on the Maudsley Personality Inventory from which the EPI was derived. The present srudy employed faking sets which might have a similar effect on EPI E scores. Introductory psychology students took the EPI anonymously under regular instructions and immediately thereafter under faking instructions. Group 1's (N = 56) instructions were to answer . . so as to appear an ideal candidate for a position as a salesman. Group 11's (N = 50) instructions were similar but also stated that the EPI contained provisions for detecting faking and that Ss should fake so as not to be detected. Regular administration means for Group I (Group 11) were 9.48 (9.72), 12.88 (13.08), and 2.23 (2.08) on N, E, and L, respectively, with SDs of 4.83 (4.30), 3.93 (3.54), and 1.63 (1.43). Faked administration means were 2.93 (3.28), 14.84 (15.02), and 6.89 (4.30), with SDs of 3.17 (2.28), 2.47 (2.56), and 1.89 (2.30). For both groups t tests for correlated means showed significant differences (p < .01) between regular and faked administration for N, E, and L. N decreased under faking while E and L increased. Separate analyses of covariance revealed F to be significant (p < .01) for L but not for N or E. Thus, the attempt-to-conceal-faking set produced a significantly smaller increase in L, but, contrary to the findings of Braun and Gomez (1966), it did not come at the cost of a smaller decrease in N. Using an L score of 4 as cut-off point, under regular administration there were 20% false positives in Group I and 18% In Group 11. Under faking sets, 95% of Group I and 56% of Group I1 had L of 4 or above; this difference was significant (p < .001). Thus, the salesman faking set produced significant changes in EPI N, E, and L scores. L scores were again shown to be of value in detecting faking but not to so great an extent as in the original srudy." @default.
• W2328465984 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2328465984 creator A5065149070 @default.
• W2328465984 creator A5075269144 @default.
• W2328465984 date "1967-02-01" @default.
• W2328465984 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2328465984 title "Effects of “Salesman Candidate” Sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory" @default.
• W2328465984 cites W1979551020 @default.
• W2328465984 cites W2161834469 @default.
• W2328465984 doi "https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.1.192" @default.
• W2328465984 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6037786" @default.
• W2328465984 hasPublicationYear "1967" @default.
• W2328465984 type Work @default.
• W2328465984 sameAs 2328465984 @default.
• W2328465984 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2328465984 countsByYear W23284659842015 @default.
• W2328465984 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2328465984 hasAuthorship W2328465984A5065149070 @default.
• W2328465984 hasAuthorship W2328465984A5075269144 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C127816348 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C144159339 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C174010058 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C206637850 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C2865642 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C127816348 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C144159339 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C15744967 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C174010058 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C187288502 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C206637850 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C2865642 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C70410870 @default.
• W2328465984 hasConceptScore W2328465984C77805123 @default.
• W2328465984 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2328465984 hasLocation W23284659841 @default.
• W2328465984 hasLocation W23284659842 @default.
• W2328465984 hasOpenAccess W2328465984 @default.
• W2328465984 hasPrimaryLocation W23284659841 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W1967456946 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W1996550148 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2015278104 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2039219881 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2046447245 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2080167010 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2082055483 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2147023152 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2377235095 @default.
• W2328465984 hasRelatedWork W2185663386 @default.
• W2328465984 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2328465984 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2328465984 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2328465984 magId "2328465984" @default.
• W2328465984 workType "article" @default.