FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2329571077> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2329571077 endingPage "125" @default.
• W2329571077 startingPage "125" @default.
• W2329571077 abstract "BACKGROUND: To evaluate perception of vaginal reconstructive surgery in women presenting for vaginal rejuvenation/vaginoplasty procedure (VR) for vaginal laxity and decreased vaginal sensation with intercourse compared to women presenting for standard prolapse repair. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with 135 sexually-active women who presented with either vaginal laxity requesting VR or symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (prolapse group), and which follows their responses to questionnaires developed by Pardo, et al,1 and modified by our institute. Questions were non-matching from preoprative and postoperative tools. All patients completed the questionnaire taken preoperatively and at minimum 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 135 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 130 subjects had completed both preoperative and postoperative questionnaire (n=77 VR, n=53 prolapse). The VR group was younger (mean age 43.57±7.93 vs. 53.68±8.47, p <0.001).The VR group was more likely to report having relaxed vagina (90.79% vs. 72.55%, p=0.007), partner’s perception of relaxed vagina (76.06% vs. 52.38%, p=0.010), and decreased vaginal sensation (88.89% vs. 71.70%, p=0.014). VR group was more likely to feel loss of physical attraction (65.71% vs. 44.68%, p=0.024) and rejection from the partner (31.43% vs. 10.64%, p=0.009). 82.81% of VR and 100% of prolapse group deciding to undergo vaginal surgery was supported by their partner (p=0.021). VR group was more likely to have had previous plastic surgery (63.64% vs. 28.89%, p<0.001). Only 36.33% from the VR group and 47.73% from the prolapse group had previously discussed the feelings of vaginal relaxation with any physicians. Interestingly, 72% of prolapse patients perceived they had a wide/relaxed vagina and 42% of the group listed a “tighter vagina” as a personal expectation of surgery. For postoperative evaluation, 83.56% of VR group and 60% of prolapse group believed that their sexual life improved after surgery (p=0.003). More than 90% of both groups reported that surgical expectations were met. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting VR believe that vaginal laxity is affecting their sexual function a greater amount than patients presenting for prolapse surgery, however in both groups sexual function did seem to be affected by their condition. Post operatively both groups’ expectations were met by surgery and overall sexual function was improved including sensation and orgasm, however the VR group was found to have a significantly higher level of overall improvement compared to standard prolapse repair." @default.
• W2329571077 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2329571077 creator A5003858896 @default.
• W2329571077 creator A5013292610 @default.
• W2329571077 creator A5019645737 @default.
• W2329571077 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2329571077 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2329571077 title "Perception of Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Rejuvenation/Vaginoplasty Procedures for Vaginal Laxity Symptoms Compared to Women Undergoing Standard Vaginal Prolapse Repair" @default.
• W2329571077 cites W2047506427 @default.
• W2329571077 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000455493.55700.9b" @default.
• W2329571077 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2329571077 type Work @default.
• W2329571077 sameAs 2329571077 @default.
• W2329571077 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2329571077 countsByYear W23295710772023 @default.
• W2329571077 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2329571077 hasAuthorship W2329571077A5003858896 @default.
• W2329571077 hasAuthorship W2329571077A5013292610 @default.
• W2329571077 hasAuthorship W2329571077A5019645737 @default.
• W2329571077 hasBestOaLocation W23295710771 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C116558999 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C2777744392 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C2780011137 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C116558999 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C141071460 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C167135981 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C2777744392 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C2780011137 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C29456083 @default.
• W2329571077 hasConceptScore W2329571077C71924100 @default.
• W2329571077 hasLocation W23295710771 @default.
• W2329571077 hasOpenAccess W2329571077 @default.
• W2329571077 hasPrimaryLocation W23295710771 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W1998952101 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2050121411 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2064922614 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2157014655 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2415341945 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2892516641 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W3007426454 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W3090936755 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W46641288 @default.
• W2329571077 hasRelatedWork W2461949635 @default.
• W2329571077 hasVolume "134" @default.
• W2329571077 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2329571077 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2329571077 magId "2329571077" @default.
• W2329571077 workType "article" @default.