FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2330442035> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2330442035 endingPage "1152" @default.
• W2330442035 startingPage "1146" @default.
• W2330442035 abstract "The rotator cuff tendon is known to exert a shear force between the superficial and deep layers. Owing to this characteristic, separate repair of delaminated rotator cuff tears has been introduced for the restoration of the physiological biomechanics of the rotator cuff. However, whether conventional en masse repair or separate repair is superior is controversial in terms of outcomes.To compare clinical outcomes between conventional en masse repair and separate double-layer double-row repair for the treatment of delaminated rotator cuff tears.Randomized controlled study; Level of evidence, 2.Between August 2007 and March 2014, a total of 82 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of a delaminated tear were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. In group 1 (n = 48), arthroscopic conventional en masse repair was performed. In group 2 (n = 34), separate double-layer double-row repair was performed. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and range of motion (ROM) were assessed before surgery; at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; and at the last follow-up visit. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 12 months postoperatively to examine the retear rate and pattern.There was no significant difference between groups in the preoperative demographic data, including patient age, sex, symptom duration, tear size, and functional scores (P > .05). The mean follow-up period was 25.9 ± 1.2 months. Significant improvements in functional and pain scores were observed in both groups at the last follow-up visit. However, no significant differences in functional scores and ROM were found between the 2 groups at each time point, except that group 2 had significantly lower VAS pain scores (P < .05) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Eight (17%) of 48 patients in group 1 and 6 (18%) of 34 patients in group 2 showed retears on MRI at 12-month follow-up (P > .05).Both conventional en masse repair and separate double-layer double-row repair were effective in improving clinical outcomes in the treatment of delaminated rotator cuff tears. Lower pain scores were seen in patients who underwent separate double-layer double-row repair." @default.
• W2330442035 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2330442035 creator A5020924348 @default.
• W2330442035 creator A5022828541 @default.
• W2330442035 creator A5038830261 @default.
• W2330442035 creator A5055445732 @default.
• W2330442035 creator A5084818663 @default.
• W2330442035 date "2016-02-24" @default.
• W2330442035 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2330442035 title "Conventional En Masse Repair Versus Separate Double-Layer Double-Row Repair for the Treatment of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears" @default.
• W2330442035 cites W1975583223 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W1988653356 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W1990209559 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2005862476 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2029958237 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2043326768 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2062148144 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2062406752 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2085325954 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2087723735 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2089089451 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2098252951 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2102376642 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2106747290 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2107979215 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2108493978 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2119373222 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W2401912695 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W4255097449 @default.
• W2330442035 cites W4320300814 @default.
• W2330442035 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516628869" @default.
• W2330442035 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26912284" @default.
• W2330442035 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2330442035 type Work @default.
• W2330442035 sameAs 2330442035 @default.
• W2330442035 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352016 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352017 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352018 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352019 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352020 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352021 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352022 @default.
• W2330442035 countsByYear W23304420352023 @default.
• W2330442035 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2330442035 hasAuthorship W2330442035A5020924348 @default.
• W2330442035 hasAuthorship W2330442035A5022828541 @default.
• W2330442035 hasAuthorship W2330442035A5038830261 @default.
• W2330442035 hasAuthorship W2330442035A5055445732 @default.
• W2330442035 hasAuthorship W2330442035A5084818663 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2776030733 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C126838900 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C141071460 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C14184104 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C143409427 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C168563851 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2776030733 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2776511800 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2778275304 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2779162959 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2780017030 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2780105995 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C2781184374 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C60465272 @default.
• W2330442035 hasConceptScore W2330442035C71924100 @default.
• W2330442035 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2330442035 hasLocation W23304420351 @default.
• W2330442035 hasLocation W23304420352 @default.
• W2330442035 hasOpenAccess W2330442035 @default.
• W2330442035 hasPrimaryLocation W23304420351 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W1460836657 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W1966836116 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2022949008 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2058507600 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2128027131 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2130147329 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2321176713 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2559233371 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W2587790924 @default.
• W2330442035 hasRelatedWork W3156486497 @default.
• W2330442035 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2330442035 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2330442035 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2330442035 magId "2330442035" @default.
• W2330442035 workType "article" @default.