FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2331478049> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2331478049 endingPage "79" @default.
• W2331478049 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2331478049 abstract "does not appear. First page follows. Although the question of securing the best rootstocks to use in citrus propagation has for many years attracted the attention of growers, experimentation on the subject has been very limited. The earliest general publication on citrus stocks in America, that of (Van Deman (1891)), is a summary of the observations and studies made on groves in Florida and is not based on comparative experiments. (Mills (1902)) has described the results of certain experiments conducted by the California Experiment Station at Pomona, California; and (Bonns and Mertz (1916)), the results of a series of comparative experiments made at the Citrus Experiment Station at Riverside. A carefully planned and executed experiment was also carried out for a limited time by (Taber (1904)) at Glen St. Mary, Florida, with certain varieties propagated on Trifoliate orange, sour orange, and sweet orange. The experiment was designed primarily to determine the comparative value of the cold-resistant Trifoliate orange as a stock. As a result of these studies and experiments and of the cumulative understanding of growers derived from long experience, certain stocks have come to be commonly used, and success in general has been achieved with them. It is well recognized, however, that the problems connected with rootstocks are poorly understood, and there is little evidence to justify a conclusion that the species and varieties now used as stocks are the best available. A fair appreciation of the value of sour orange, sweet orange, lemon, grapefruit, and certain other species as stocks has been acquired, but until recently no attention has been directed to variations within these species and the influence of such variations on the fruit or scion variety. Until recently this was also the case in the propagation of all other commercial fruits, such as the apple and pear. The experiments herein reported, which were started in 1914 (Webber, 1919) and (1920), resulted in directing attention to the great variability among seedlings of the same species or stock type, and to the probable influence of such variation on the uniformity of the orchard trees produced. The present paper will outline the results obtained with these experiments up to the present time, and will discuss briefly the influence that the findings may have in improving nursery methods in the future." @default.
• W2331478049 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2331478049 creator A5055231703 @default.
• W2331478049 date "1932-06-01" @default.
• W2331478049 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2331478049 title "Variations in citrus seedlings and their relation to rootstock selection" @default.
• W2331478049 cites W1997336762 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2282228711 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2301076673 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2317789262 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2323576520 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2325636462 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2338316340 @default.
• W2331478049 cites W2993479403 @default.
• W2331478049 doi "https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v07n01p001" @default.
• W2331478049 hasPublicationYear "1932" @default.
• W2331478049 type Work @default.
• W2331478049 sameAs 2331478049 @default.
• W2331478049 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2331478049 countsByYear W23314780492022 @default.
• W2331478049 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2331478049 hasAuthorship W2331478049A5055231703 @default.
• W2331478049 hasBestOaLocation W23314780491 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C204036174 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C27406016 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C2778928459 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C83082669 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C144027150 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C166957645 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C204036174 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C205649164 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C27406016 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C2778928459 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C33923547 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C83082669 @default.
• W2331478049 hasConceptScore W2331478049C86803240 @default.
• W2331478049 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2331478049 hasLocation W23314780491 @default.
• W2331478049 hasOpenAccess W2331478049 @default.
• W2331478049 hasPrimaryLocation W23314780491 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2099926683 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2187466493 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2189827634 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2247341240 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2273414748 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2283009206 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W2364830822 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W303061505 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W4289845046 @default.
• W2331478049 hasRelatedWork W4380851916 @default.
• W2331478049 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2331478049 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2331478049 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2331478049 magId "2331478049" @default.
• W2331478049 workType "article" @default.