FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2331650315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2331650315 endingPage "52" @default.
• W2331650315 startingPage "45" @default.
• W2331650315 abstract "Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to be an eff ective technique to strengthen muscle following musculoskeletal injury or surgery. A limitation of NMES is the discomfort caused by the strong electrical contractions required for eff ective strength gains. This article explores whether the application of cryotherapy over muscle aff ects the ability of the muscle to contract in response to NMES and whether the reduction in discomfort of the stimulus enables greater force production. Eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. This review found that short-duration application of cryotherapy can improve tolerance to strong contractions elicited by NMES for muscle strengthening; however, longerduration applications may aff ect muscle force production. More studies are needed to determine the eff ect of cryotherapy on force production of muscle during NMES and whether greater increases in strength can be achieved. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a widely used intervention for rehabilitation of weak or damaged muscle. Studies support the use of this technique for strengthening muscle following ligament repairs of the knee and total knee joint arthroplasties.1-4 The typical clinical approach is to place electrodes on the skin overlying the motor points of the muscle, which are usually defi ned as the location over the muscle where the motor nerve to the muscle is most accessible. The intensity of the stimulation depends on the amplitude, duration, and frequency of the electrical pulses, or bursts. A high-amplitude, longpulse duration stimulus is required to achieve a contraction that is at least 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). This stimulus may not be tolerated by the patient. Farquhar and Snyder-Mackler5 identifi ed patient discomfort as the limiting factor in using NMES in clinical settings, especially “when high contractile forces are sought for strength training regimens.” Most clinical uses of NMES are for strengthening of weak or injured muscle. The use of NMES for uninjured individuals is uncommon because strength gains can be achieved by exercise programs without the use of NMES. Patient tolerance to NMES for muscle strengthening depends primarily on the type of electrical current chosen for the treatment and the patient’s pain coping style.5 Some patients can tolerate burst mode alternating current (Russian stimulation) NMES, whereas other patients prefer biphasic pulsed NMES. Pain coping style varies from those patients who focus on the discomfort of NMES and those who focus on the benefi ts of the treatment and are willing to tolerate discomfort. Patients who focus on the discomfort of NMES require a blunting strategy to decrease their perception of pain. Strategies for blunting the perception of pain can include distraction by listening to music or interventions that interrupt nociception to the central nervous system. Modalities such as cryotherapy applied during or prior to NMES may be an effective blunting strategy; however, decreasing the temperature of tissues overlying a muscle or of the muscle itself may affect the ability of NMES to achieve a muscle contraction. The effect of Dr Nolan and Dr Galantino are from the Physical Therapy Program, School of Health Sciences, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Galloway; and Dr Buccafurni is from Fox Rehabilitation, Northfi eld, New Jersey. Received: January 4, 2011 Accepted: June 12, 2012 Posted Online: January 2, 2013 The authors have no fi nancial or proprietary interest in the materials presented" @default.
• W2331650315 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2331650315 creator A5067174152 @default.
• W2331650315 creator A5067370867 @default.
• W2331650315 creator A5069877560 @default.
• W2331650315 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2331650315 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2331650315 title "Effect of Cryotherapy on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: A Review of the Literature" @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1168328211 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1755346912 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1794268774 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1979294103 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1986215651 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W1992545703 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2000481216 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2027474422 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2034846969 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2041785877 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2041820287 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2049973986 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2050325669 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2051151561 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2051397704 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2062700310 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2063619377 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2066862693 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2073704012 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2083957491 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2116481963 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2138698307 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2147673402 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2163284095 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2404247153 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W2414291673 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W4206724725 @default.
• W2331650315 cites W4250661866 @default.
• W2331650315 doi "https://doi.org/10.3928/19425864-20130102-01" @default.
• W2331650315 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2331650315 type Work @default.
• W2331650315 sameAs 2331650315 @default.
• W2331650315 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2331650315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2331650315 hasAuthorship W2331650315A5067174152 @default.
• W2331650315 hasAuthorship W2331650315A5067370867 @default.
• W2331650315 hasAuthorship W2331650315A5069877560 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C2780149145 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C126322002 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C141071460 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C24998067 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C2780149145 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C71924100 @default.
• W2331650315 hasConceptScore W2331650315C99508421 @default.
• W2331650315 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2331650315 hasLocation W23316503151 @default.
• W2331650315 hasOpenAccess W2331650315 @default.
• W2331650315 hasPrimaryLocation W23316503151 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2019717165 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2115060218 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2128407063 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2369608135 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2411196916 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2899584929 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W3038498107 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W3048311307 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W3210983102 @default.
• W2331650315 hasRelatedWork W2006291003 @default.
• W2331650315 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2331650315 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2331650315 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2331650315 magId "2331650315" @default.
• W2331650315 workType "article" @default.