FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2332133745> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2332133745 endingPage "137" @default.
• W2332133745 startingPage "137" @default.
• W2332133745 abstract "Literary is an odd field, and, within literary studies at large, it is as often vilified as respected, as often dismissed as celebrated. The very word theory is enough to raise the hackles of half the people in my English department, and I still remember, sometimes with chuckles and sometimes with flashbacks of fear and loathing, how one member of my Ph.D. committee angrily blurted out that the theoretical discourse in my dissertation proposal was barbaric. People in literary studies have an understandable tendency to discriminate among various kinds of language use, and the various languages in which takes place (from the technical to the politicized to the arcane) are found by many in the antitheory camp to be abominations. The threat that some theoretical enterprises pose to business-as-usual in literary departments has also aroused responses ranging from indignation to despair. But since literary has slowly become institutionalized over the last decade or so, much of the early anger at its savage threat to civilized conversation seems to have gone underground, surfacing only during searches for new faculty, for instance, or in meetings on curricula. Music theory, on the other hand, incurs little antagonism, and its validity as an academic specialty is not a subject of controversy. Few musicologists would suggest that music is a vulgar, flash-in-the-pan backslide from proper academic concerns. Literary theory, however, is simply not of literature in the same way that music is of music. Literary is a collection of theories, most in competition rather than cooperation with each other, not about literature per se, but about the study or the reading of literature. There is a technical language of poetic form and meter that has the classificatory specificity of musical theories of form, and there is a set of narrative theories, often known (by those who do not do it) as high-tech narratology, RING THE BLUES: W E.B. DU BOIS, SHIONABLE DISEASES, AND DEGRADED MUSIC" @default.
• W2332133745 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2332133745 creator A5003016313 @default.
• W2332133745 date "1991-01-01" @default.
• W2332133745 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2332133745 title "Curing the Blues: W. E. B. Du Bois, Fashionable Diseases, and Degraded Music" @default.
• W2332133745 cites W131360712 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1486140897 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1499953710 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1530663994 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1538093483 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1561032337 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1965825912 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1966871543 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W1983155922 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2001958604 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2037658306 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2049244502 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2052646139 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2060186325 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2077568497 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2126847305 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2152787184 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2314473308 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2325391507 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W2486134301 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W3122039176 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W560748565 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W580109688 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W593524229 @default.
• W2332133745 cites W649261052 @default.
• W2332133745 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/779263" @default.
• W2332133745 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W2332133745 type Work @default.
• W2332133745 sameAs 2332133745 @default.
• W2332133745 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2332133745 countsByYear W23321337452012 @default.
• W2332133745 countsByYear W23321337452020 @default.
• W2332133745 countsByYear W23321337452022 @default.
• W2332133745 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2332133745 hasAuthorship W2332133745A5003016313 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConcept C139015958 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConcept C2980749 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConceptScore W2332133745C139015958 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConceptScore W2332133745C142362112 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConceptScore W2332133745C153349607 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConceptScore W2332133745C2980749 @default.
• W2332133745 hasConceptScore W2332133745C52119013 @default.
• W2332133745 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2332133745 hasLocation W23321337451 @default.
• W2332133745 hasOpenAccess W2332133745 @default.
• W2332133745 hasPrimaryLocation W23321337451 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W1524619786 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W2072769285 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W2076662108 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W2291892328 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W2340238429 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W3188902470 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W420543474 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W4252512738 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W571190172 @default.
• W2332133745 hasRelatedWork W2978749616 @default.
• W2332133745 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2332133745 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2332133745 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2332133745 magId "2332133745" @default.
• W2332133745 workType "article" @default.