FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2332365675> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2332365675 endingPage "628" @default.
• W2332365675 startingPage "628" @default.
• W2332365675 abstract "It is shown that using the CAPM to determine profit margins for property-liability insurance companies presents regulatory commissions with a set of implementation difficulties. These difficulties arise from the unacceptably wide range of acceptable profit margins generated using the CAPM. In particular, if beta is calculated using the appropriate data differencing interval, the confidence intervals may be so wide as to produce unreliable estimates of both beta and profit margin. Use of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has become widespread by regulatory commissions in the rate setting process. Since the Hope decision,' the legal standard for determining rates of return has been that the returns be 'commensurate with returns on investments in other enterprises having corresponding risks.' It is claimed that the CAPM enables regulators to determine consistent risk adjusted rates of return and commensurate profit margins. Venezian, however, has recently suggested that the CAPM is unsuitable on theoretical grounds for use in insurance industry regulatory proceedings. He cites circularity in the arguments made by those using the CAPM since an exogenous rate increase is based upon the results of the CAPM which in turn are based upon the rate increase. Venezian has also recently suggested [1 14 that financial theoretic approaches such as the CAPM lose relevance in the regulation of businesses which are structured competitively and for whose assets there are viable financial markets.' While other difficulties have been addressed in using the CAPM in a regulatory framework [ 1,2,3,7,8,9,10], it is still one of the central models upon which allowed rates of return and profit margin are based. Fairley [4] recently proposed an approach to determine equilibrium rates of return and appropriate profit margins for property-liability insurers using the CAPM. His approach calculates the insurer's profit margin as a function of its calculated systematic risk, beta. The purpose of this paper is to show, using Fairley's profit margin model, that in situations where the CAPM is utilized to determine profit margins, the Allen Michel is Associate Professor of Finance at Boston University. James Norris is a Corporate Banking Officer at Bay Bank Harvard Trust Company. The research was completed while the author was associated with the Corporate Research and Planning Group at Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. ' Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591, 603 (1944). 2Personal communication with Venezian." @default.
• W2332365675 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2332365675 creator A5005063134 @default.
• W2332365675 creator A5071961603 @default.
• W2332365675 date "1982-12-01" @default.
• W2332365675 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2332365675 title "On the Determination of Appropriate Profit Margins in Insurance Industry Regulation" @default.
• W2332365675 cites W1513078330 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W1561251353 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W1967364653 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W1980472408 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2005356412 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2011885565 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2020517403 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2030727884 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2075910563 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2090393090 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2092342037 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2094322896 @default.
• W2332365675 cites W2122582639 @default.
• W2332365675 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/252765" @default.
• W2332365675 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2332365675 type Work @default.
• W2332365675 sameAs 2332365675 @default.
• W2332365675 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2332365675 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2332365675 hasAuthorship W2332365675A5005063134 @default.
• W2332365675 hasAuthorship W2332365675A5071961603 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConcept C189560676 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConcept C2984333267 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConceptScore W2332365675C10138342 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConceptScore W2332365675C144133560 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConceptScore W2332365675C162118730 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConceptScore W2332365675C189560676 @default.
• W2332365675 hasConceptScore W2332365675C2984333267 @default.
• W2332365675 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2332365675 hasLocation W23323656751 @default.
• W2332365675 hasOpenAccess W2332365675 @default.
• W2332365675 hasPrimaryLocation W23323656751 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W1992872265 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2061180044 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2064827527 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2389036130 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2434269030 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2582704060 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W3199497333 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W4245644602 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2104102448 @default.
• W2332365675 hasRelatedWork W2738625702 @default.
• W2332365675 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W2332365675 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2332365675 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2332365675 magId "2332365675" @default.
• W2332365675 workType "article" @default.