FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2334303506> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2334303506 abstract "The Vlasov effect in composite beams is studied using the variational asymptotic method. It is shown how both Timoshenko and Vlasov models can be consistently obtained based on the energy that is asymptotically correct up to the second order. Interpretation in terms of the classical strength of materials approach is provided, and interplay between finding shear center, the Timoshenko shear corrections, and Vlasov theory is discussed. In particular, it is observed that constructing a theory that has both Timoshenko and Vlasov corrections is not straightforward; instead it is suggested to construct a Timoshenko theory first, then use it to find the shear center, and finally construct a Vlasov theory with the origin at the shear center. The method is illustrated with a simple example. Introduction Traditionally, composite beam theory was developed based on the extensions of the theories for isotropic beams. This route turned out to be challenging at times due to the fact that certain assumptions which happened to work quite well for isotropic beams led to erroneous results for composites. One can separate such assumptions into two groups: 1. An assumption is correct for isotropic materials, but incorrect in general for anisotropic materials. An example of such an assumption (that seems so obvious that is actually rarely explicitly stated) “bending shell strain measures can be neglected for closed sections” (see for the evidence that this assumption can lead to significant errors for certain lay-ups). 2. An assumption is actually wrong for isotropic materials as well, but the required correction is small and thus the assumption considered to be ∗Research Engineer, School of Aerospace Engineering. Member, AIAA and AHS. †Graduate Research Assistant, School of Aerospace Engineering. Student member, AIAA. ‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering. Fellow, AIAA. Member, AHS and ASCE. Copyright c © 2002 by Vitali V. Volovoi, Wenbin Yu, and Dewey H. Hodges. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. with permission. valid. The error can be significantly magnified for composite beams. A good example of such an erroneous assumption is the one used for thinwalled sections: “a cross-section remains rigid in its own plane” that was used practically in all displacement-based thin-walled theories, including the classical work of Vlasov. In retrospect it is hard to explain the resilience of this error and its pervasive permeation into composite theories. Perhaps it can be contributed to the fact that beam theories are approximations to 3-D elasticity, and therefore small corrections are considered to be acceptable; see further discussion of such inconsistencies in Vlasov’s work in Ref. 4. It is heartening to see that in the last decade, this assumption has been slowly but surely eliminated, and practically all recent work on the subject takes into account the in-plane cross-sectional deformation, at least implicitly by correcting the constitutive law. Despite all the recent progress in the area of composite beam theories, however, there are certain very basic questions that are still not totally explained even for isotropic case. The present paper is devoted to one of such questions: how to construct a consistent beam theory that would appropriately take into account shear Vlasov corrections and these two corrections are related to the location of a shear center. Even for simple, thin-walled isotropic beams, such as a channel section, this question has not been fully addressed. Let us recall that in classical strength of material books the shear center is found using shell equilibrium equation, so that shear flow is found along the contour. At the same time, one can use shear flow to estimate shear correction factors applying to open sections, a procedure described in Ref. 6 for closed sections. But their resulting Timoshenko theory does not predict the torsional-shear coupling that is needed to locate the shear center. At the same time, traditionally Vlasov theory (also sometimes referred to as Wagner theory) is treated as a completely independent problem from that of finding the shear center or shear corrections." @default.
• W2334303506 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2334303506 creator A5015960229 @default.
• W2334303506 creator A5020992691 @default.
• W2334303506 creator A5078217752 @default.
• W2334303506 date "2002-04-22" @default.
• W2334303506 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2334303506 title "Asymptotic Treatment of the Vlasov Effect for Composite Beams" @default.
• W2334303506 cites W1974075980 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W1978271066 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2001779052 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2003705871 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2004770070 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2083846680 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2093499016 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2320888263 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W3094632123 @default.
• W2334303506 cites W2322399078 @default.
• W2334303506 doi "https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-1313" @default.
• W2334303506 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2334303506 type Work @default.
• W2334303506 sameAs 2334303506 @default.
• W2334303506 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2334303506 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2334303506 hasAuthorship W2334303506A5015960229 @default.
• W2334303506 hasAuthorship W2334303506A5020992691 @default.
• W2334303506 hasAuthorship W2334303506A5078217752 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C186175660 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConcept C82706917 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C104779481 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C121332964 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C159985019 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C185544564 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C186175660 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C192562407 @default.
• W2334303506 hasConceptScore W2334303506C82706917 @default.
• W2334303506 hasLocation W23343035061 @default.
• W2334303506 hasOpenAccess W2334303506 @default.
• W2334303506 hasPrimaryLocation W23343035061 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2321233755 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2322525577 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2375287304 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2390939531 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2391130230 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W2753632050 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W3084472817 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W3129030146 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W3129970207 @default.
• W2334303506 hasRelatedWork W3198375218 @default.
• W2334303506 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2334303506 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2334303506 magId "2334303506" @default.
• W2334303506 workType "article" @default.