FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2334623218> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2334623218 endingPage "608" @default.
• W2334623218 startingPage "587" @default.
• W2334623218 abstract "Contents I Introduction II SAS v France: Facts and Proceedings A Facts B Proceedings III The Unconsidered Limitation Ground: Ordre Public A The 'Absence' of Ordre Public Arguments in SAS v France B From Ordre Public to the Rights and Freedoms of Others in 'Headscarf Cases' C Ordre Public Arguments under the Rights and Freedoms of Others in Other Cases IV Implications for the Future V Conclusion This case note comprises a review of the European Court of Human Rights' ('ECtHR ') judgment in SAS v France which upheld the French 'burqa ban'. I focus on the ECtHR's acceptance of a French societal principle, vivre ensemble, as a limitation on the rights to privacy and freedom of religion covered by the limitation ground of 'the protection of the rights and freedoms of others 1 argue that, contrary to what a number of authors have proposed, the ECtHR did not take a new approach to 'the rights and freedoms of others' in SAS v France. Rather, as I demonstrate with the help of the 'headscarf cases' leading up to the judgment and other cases in which the ECtHR sanctioned reliance on fundamental societal principles, SAS v France further establishes an emerging trend at the ECtHR to bring in what are essentially ordre public (public order) arguments under human rights provisions which do not contain an ordre public limitation ground via their inclusion under 'the rights and freedoms of others'. I INTRODUCTION Voted worst judgment of 2014 by Strasbourg Observers, (1) the European Court of Human Rights' ('ECtHR' or 'the Court') judgment in SAS v France, which upheld what is commonly known as the French 'burqa ban', (2) stirred up quite some controversy among critics. (3) Not many commentators had expected the ECtHR to uphold the French ban on full-face coverings in public, (4) much less that the Court would do so on the basis of the notion of vivre ensemble ('living together') accepted by the Court to form part of the limitation ground of 'the rights and freedoms of others' under arts 8 (privacy) and 9 (freedom of religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights ('ECHR' or 'Convention'). (5) Some have argued that the Court took an entirely novel approach to 'the rights and freedoms of others', being for the first time confronted with the concept of vivre ensemble. (6) This case note reviews the judgment in SAS v France and subsequently argues that the Court was neither first confronted with vivre ensemble, nor did it take a novel approach to 'the rights and freedoms of others'. Rather, SAS v France forms part of a trend at the ECtHR to include what are essentially public order (ordre public) considerations (eg vivre ensemble) in 'the rights and freedoms of others' limitation under human rights, which do not contain a public order (ordre public) limitation ground. Placing the judgment of SAS v France in context, I will demonstrate that it forms part of a development under the ECtHR's case law instead of offering a 'novel approach'. Following this introduction, I first introduce the case of SAS v France (Part II). Thereafter, I explain how the Court in SAS v France attempted to 'remedy' the lack of a public order (ordre public) limitation under ECHR art 8 through an acceptance of ordre public considerations under 'the rights and freedoms of others', and that doing so is not a new practice but part of an emerging trend developed within the context of religious manifestation and beyond (Part III). Subsequently, I indicate future implications of broadening the limitation ground of 'the rights and freedoms of others' to encompass public order (ordre public) and the ruling in SAS v France (Part IV) and end with a short conclusion (Part V). II SAS V FRANCE: FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS A Facts On 11 April 2011, Law No 2010-1192 prohibiting all (7) persons present on French territory to conceal their faces in public, including through full-face veils, (8) entered into force. …" @default.
• W2334623218 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2334623218 creator A5048984255 @default.
• W2334623218 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W2334623218 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2334623218 title "'The government did not refer to it': 'Sas v France' and 'ordre public' at the European court of human rights" @default.
• W2334623218 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2334623218 type Work @default.
• W2334623218 sameAs 2334623218 @default.
• W2334623218 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2334623218 countsByYear W23346232182017 @default.
• W2334623218 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2334623218 hasAuthorship W2334623218A5048984255 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C10138342 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C138885662 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C144024400 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C162324750 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C169437150 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C17744445 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C182306322 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C199539241 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C2778137410 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C41895202 @default.
• W2334623218 hasConceptScore W2334623218C95691615 @default.
• W2334623218 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2334623218 hasLocation W23346232181 @default.
• W2334623218 hasOpenAccess W2334623218 @default.
• W2334623218 hasPrimaryLocation W23346232181 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W104718664 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1121814718 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1532518338 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1541669179 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1586417574 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1954752369 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W1973278022 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2074101168 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2100054681 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W210156916 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2266559057 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2605515352 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2765351337 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2774973566 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W2912606967 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W3038291131 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W3122906923 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W323836996 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W72759772 @default.
• W2334623218 hasRelatedWork W757451800 @default.
• W2334623218 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2334623218 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2334623218 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2334623218 magId "2334623218" @default.
• W2334623218 workType "article" @default.