FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2336240724> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2336240724 endingPage "756" @default.
• W2336240724 startingPage "743" @default.
• W2336240724 abstract "Ministry of National Education piloted multiple sources of performance evaluation in some schools within performance evaluation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of multiple source of performance evaluation on school climate. With this purpose, administrators and teachers of two piloted schools, and supervisors who supervised those schools were interviewed individually by using semi-structured interview technique. Collected data analyzed by using content analysis. Most of the participants (15 teachers, 5 supervisors, 3 administrators) claimed that multiple source of performance evaluations affects school climate negatively. Those negative effects were explained under three themes as emotion, behavior and thought. Those negative effects were believed to emerge from nonobjective evaluation and/or misconduct evaluation practices. Multiple source of evaluation affects organizational climate negatively SUMMARY Purpose and significance: Although many research conducted in relation to the multiple source of performance evaluation, a few studies conducted about the effect of multiple source of performance evaluations on school climate. Kudisch, Fortunato and Smith (2006) suggested that some variables were related to the organization, such as organizational climate; thus, they should be studied with multiple source of performance evaluation. A study conducted by Akbaba-Altun and Memisoglu (2008) indicated that one of the problems faced in applying multiple source of performance evaluation was related to the derogation in school climate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to find out the effects of multiple source of performance evaluation on school climate. Method: This is a qualitative study which was conducted in two schools where multiple source of performance evaluations had been piloted. The participants included one school principal, two assistant principals, and 16 teachers working at schools; and, six supervisors who had supervised those two schools were also asked to participate in this study. Data were collected through interview and were analyzed by content analysis. Finally, the findings were visually presented. Results: It was found that multiple source of performance evaluation had both positive and negative effects on organizational climate; however, the negative effects outnumbered the positive effects at the dimensions of emotion, thought and behavior. Those negative effects were believed to emerge from nonobjective evaluation and/or misconduct evaluation practices. Discussion and Conclusion: Since this is a qualitative study limited with two schools, the findings should not be generalized. The reviewed literature indicates both positive and negative outcomes of using multiple source of performance evaluation. Thus, the findings of this study are in parallel with the literature. Being objective and evaluating one, peers, superiors, and subordinates are learnable behaviors. Thus, there is a need to describe how to be an objective evaluator as an emerging phenomenon. Multiple source of evaluation affects organizational climate negatively. Thus, more qualitative and quantitative research is needed." @default.
• W2336240724 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2336240724 creator A5051357945 @default.
• W2336240724 creator A5078954429 @default.
• W2336240724 date "2011-06-01" @default.
• W2336240724 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2336240724 title "The Effect of Multiple Source of Performance Evaluation on School Climate" @default.
• W2336240724 cites W1587916184 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W1998282775 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2004344334 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2057669384 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2076337277 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2082648235 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2087695130 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2094781835 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2116845204 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2169065523 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2169704648 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2170629381 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2171381018 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2239199721 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2317748595 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2732919313 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W2890520882 @default.
• W2336240724 cites W560581226 @default.
• W2336240724 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2336240724 type Work @default.
• W2336240724 sameAs 2336240724 @default.
• W2336240724 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2336240724 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2336240724 hasAuthorship W2336240724A5051357945 @default.
• W2336240724 hasAuthorship W2336240724A5078954429 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C185654502 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C2983685735 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C521751864 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C124101348 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C15744967 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C17744445 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C185654502 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C199539241 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C2983685735 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C41008148 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C521751864 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C75630572 @default.
• W2336240724 hasConceptScore W2336240724C77805123 @default.
• W2336240724 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2336240724 hasLocation W23362407241 @default.
• W2336240724 hasOpenAccess W2336240724 @default.
• W2336240724 hasPrimaryLocation W23362407241 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W1528041910 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2093181284 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2124841579 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2187665527 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W219382651 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2465268677 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2547319172 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2560502826 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2575378563 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2607058285 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2792857748 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2795376250 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2886620301 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2915831706 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W2980997620 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W302177280 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W3022664201 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W3093256155 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W3124442064 @default.
• W2336240724 hasRelatedWork W3126386647 @default.
• W2336240724 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2336240724 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2336240724 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2336240724 magId "2336240724" @default.
• W2336240724 workType "article" @default.