FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2337835196> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2337835196 abstract "Over the past decades, great strides have been made to establish coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography within the field of cardiovascular medicine. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in comparison with invasive angiography was demonstrated in numerous single- and multicenter studies.1 From large registry data, an understanding developed of how cardiac CT could affect therapeutic management within different clinical contexts. Most recent clinical practice guidelines support the use of cardiac CT as a primary or secondary diagnostic option for patients with stable chest pain symptoms.2,3 As a last step toward full recognition, several randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate the effect of cardiac CT on clinical outcome in comparison with established noninvasive strategies.4–7See Article by Bittencourt et al In this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging , Bittencourt et al8 performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials published until March 2015 that compared the clinical effectiveness of coronary CT angiography to other noninvasive strategies, and could make several interesting observations for which the separate trials had insufficient power. Although none of the trials demonstrated a statistically significant difference in hard end points, pooling of data from 14 817 patients in this meta-analysis demonstrated that implementation of cardiac CT was associated with a 31% lower myocardial infarction rate compared with usual care. For mortality, no significant difference could be demonstrated between both strategies. Cardiac CT also led to more revascularization procedures (77%), as well as a trend toward more invasive angiograms. We can only speculate whether there is a direct relation between the higher revascularization rate and the lower incidence of myocardial infarction, as other factors may be involved. At first glance the designs of the respective studies seem too different to combine. In terms of size Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation …" @default.
• W2337835196 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2337835196 creator A5053535508 @default.
• W2337835196 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2337835196 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2337835196 title "Clinical Value of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Stable Angina" @default.
• W2337835196 cites W1936833235 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2000682478 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2065355751 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2142935346 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2155625563 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2160133249 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2160414137 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2253666563 @default.
• W2337835196 cites W2341492118 @default.
• W2337835196 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.116.004783" @default.
• W2337835196 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27072304" @default.
• W2337835196 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2337835196 type Work @default.
• W2337835196 sameAs 2337835196 @default.
• W2337835196 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2337835196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2337835196 hasAuthorship W2337835196A5053535508 @default.
• W2337835196 hasBestOaLocation W23378351961 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2777785093 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2778425758 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2778704086 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C2983858294 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C126322002 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C126838900 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C164705383 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C168563851 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2777785093 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2778425758 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2778704086 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2779464278 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2780643987 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C2983858294 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C500558357 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C535046627 @default.
• W2337835196 hasConceptScore W2337835196C71924100 @default.
• W2337835196 hasLocation W23378351961 @default.
• W2337835196 hasLocation W23378351962 @default.
• W2337835196 hasOpenAccess W2337835196 @default.
• W2337835196 hasPrimaryLocation W23378351961 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W1963729857 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W1993578873 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2028734218 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2066008439 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2078755748 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2082597985 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2331652622 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W2434589850 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W3205797963 @default.
• W2337835196 hasRelatedWork W4210841759 @default.
• W2337835196 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2337835196 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2337835196 magId "2337835196" @default.
• W2337835196 workType "article" @default.