FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2339647533> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2339647533 endingPage "338" @default.
• W2339647533 startingPage "332" @default.
• W2339647533 abstract "OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine if there is a significant difference in surgical site infection (SSI) when comparing the Wiltse and midline approaches for posterior instrumented interbody fusions of the lumbar spine and, secondarily, to evaluate if the reoperation rates and specific causes for reoperation were similar for both approaches. METHODS A total of 358 patients who underwent 1- or 2-level posterior instrumented interbody fusions for degenerative lumbar spinal pathology through either a midline or Wiltse approach were prospectively followed between March 2005 and January 2011 at a single tertiary care facility. A retrospective analysis was performed primarily to evaluate the incidence of SSI and the incidence and causes for reoperation. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay. A matched analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test and a logistic regression model. The matched analysis controlled for age, sex, comorbidities, number of index levels addressed surgically, number of levels fused, and the use of bone grafting. RESULTS All patients returned for follow-up at 1 year, and adverse events were followed for 2 years. The rate of SSI was greater in the midline group (8 of 103 patients; 7.8%) versus the Wiltse group (1 of 103 patients; 1.0%) (p = 0.018). Fewer additional surgical procedures were performed in the Wiltse group (p = 0.025; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.95). Proximal adjacent segment failure requiring reoperation occurred more frequently in the midline group (15 of 103 patients; 14.6%) versus the Wiltse group (6 of 103 patients; 5.8%) (p = 0.048). Blood loss was significantly lower in the Wiltse group (436 ml) versus the midline group (703 ml); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in intraoperative complications or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS The patients who underwent the Wiltse approach had a decreased risk of wound breakdown and infection, less blood loss, and fewer reoperations than the midline patients. The risk of adjacent segment failure in short posterior constructs is lower with a Wiltse approach." @default.
• W2339647533 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5002204071 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5027259098 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5033992113 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5064463300 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5065123039 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5078693354 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5086292885 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5086709031 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5087924521 @default.
• W2339647533 creator A5088695630 @default.
• W2339647533 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2339647533 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2339647533 title "A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine" @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1511626418 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1521994300 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1965585025 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1966512624 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1972590016 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1978058582 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1984963895 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W1990112607 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2011204943 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2021700578 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2037357825 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2040362535 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2047754027 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2047928166 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2057186342 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2057497042 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2061997028 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2065938942 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2072388270 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2073600538 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2082835197 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2083022476 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2090443331 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2102470306 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2137570385 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2138400608 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2139599336 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2263715618 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2328838471 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W2331172758 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W4235976125 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W4253710285 @default.
• W2339647533 cites W49726960 @default.
• W2339647533 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.2.spine151018" @default.
• W2339647533 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27104286" @default.
• W2339647533 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2339647533 type Work @default.
• W2339647533 sameAs 2339647533 @default.
• W2339647533 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332017 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332018 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332019 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332020 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332021 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332022 @default.
• W2339647533 countsByYear W23396475332023 @default.
• W2339647533 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5002204071 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5027259098 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5033992113 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5064463300 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5065123039 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5078693354 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5086292885 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5086709031 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5087924521 @default.
• W2339647533 hasAuthorship W2339647533A5088695630 @default.
• W2339647533 hasBestOaLocation W23396475331 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C2779835254 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C120665830 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C121332964 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C141071460 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C167135981 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C2779835254 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C44575665 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C61511704 @default.
• W2339647533 hasConceptScore W2339647533C71924100 @default.
• W2339647533 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2339647533 hasLocation W23396475331 @default.
• W2339647533 hasLocation W23396475332 @default.
• W2339647533 hasOpenAccess W2339647533 @default.
• W2339647533 hasPrimaryLocation W23396475331 @default.
• W2339647533 hasRelatedWork W1501205893 @default.
• W2339647533 hasRelatedWork W2026620686 @default.
• W2339647533 hasRelatedWork W2036989460 @default.
• W2339647533 hasRelatedWork W2057334354 @default.

• next