FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2339735525> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2339735525 startingPage "645" @default.
• W2339735525 abstract "INTRODUCTIONThe literature on public participation in municipal budgeting is extensive, but we know little about what municipal budget directors think about the efficacy of public involvement. Empirical research on public involvement in budgeting has found that meaningful participation increases organizational effectiveness (Guo and Neshkova, 2013), public trust (Herian, 2011), and citizen perception of access (Preisser, 1997). A constant finding in the literature is how public involvement early in the budget process can have a positive effect on organizational performance (Guo and Neshkova, 2013) and financial decisions (Ebdon and Franklin, 2006). Based on this research, municipal reformers often call for normative models of budgeting with more public participation early in the process. However, few studies have surveyed the viewpoints of practitioners regarding the efficacy of public participation in municipal budgeting. The limited research on practitioner opinion describes managers as being critical of participation early in the process (Berner, 2004). Accordingly, current normative models are based on limited research into practitioner opinion.In this research, we seek address the literature's limited research on the opinions held by municipal public managers regarding public participation in budgeting. We extend Berner's (2004) survey of city and county officials in North Carolina a nationwide sample of municipal budget directors from cities that have been commended for their budgeting practices. We define quality budgeting cities as ones that have won the Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) rigorous distinguished budget award for the quality of their budget documents. The research contributes the literature by extending public administration's knowledge of what types of methods are being used in quality budgeting cities and what public participation methods are viewed as effective by budgeting practitioners in these cities. The research moves the literature away from mostly normative models of participation toward practitioner-informed, descriptive models.GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONThe GFOA is an association comprised of members from the United States and Canada with the overall goal to enhance and promote professional management in fiscal matters through training, encouraging cooperation, and increasing leadership capacity (Government Finance Officers Association, n.d.). With its awards program, the association tends focus on state and local budgeting issues. Since 1984, the association has given its distinguished budget presentation award state and local governments that have budgeting procedures that meet a challenging set of criteria. The award's criteria assess a budget document based on its usefulness as a financial guide, communication device, and operational guide. A local government's budget must include simple items like a table of contents and more complex information, such as an overview of revenue and expenditures in a manner that can be understood by citizens.1To win this award, a government's budget must meet the GFOA criteria as interpreted by highly qualified reviewers. While the award is focused on the actual budget document, we assume, for the purposes of this research, that a city needs quality budgeting procedures draft a document that is recognized by the GFOA. Given the GFOA's reputation and the robustness of the award's criteria, cities that win this award can be considered high performing budgeting cities. The award is a standard that cities should try achieve. Accordingly, we view budget directors in GFOA as being informed budget managers. When it comes the efficacy of participation, the opinions of informed managers matter. If public participation is effective, as described by normative models in the literature (Innes and Booher, 2004), then it can be hypothesized that informed budget managers should also view public participation as being useful. …" @default.
• W2339735525 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2339735525 creator A5047065023 @default.
• W2339735525 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W2339735525 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2339735525 title "The Efficacy of Public Participation in Municipal Budgeting: An Exploratory Survey of Officials in Government Finance Officers Association's Award-Winning Cities" @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2005012131 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2008251417 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2083960138 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2112613414 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2157552636 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W2171510067 @default.
• W2339735525 cites W349515078 @default.
• W2339735525 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2339735525 type Work @default.
• W2339735525 sameAs 2339735525 @default.
• W2339735525 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2339735525 countsByYear W23397355252018 @default.
• W2339735525 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2339735525 hasAuthorship W2339735525A5047065023 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C2776035091 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C2778719706 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C138885662 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C142362112 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C144024400 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C144133560 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C153349607 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C17744445 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C19165224 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C199539241 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C2776035091 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C2778137410 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C2778719706 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C3116431 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C39549134 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C41895202 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C44725695 @default.
• W2339735525 hasConceptScore W2339735525C85973986 @default.
• W2339735525 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2339735525 hasLocation W23397355251 @default.
• W2339735525 hasOpenAccess W2339735525 @default.
• W2339735525 hasPrimaryLocation W23397355251 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W1970836981 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2030665694 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2092999705 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W228425148 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2292234665 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2318031352 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2367211181 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2619068560 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2754644762 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2955455912 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2961339343 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2986740469 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W3126594362 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W3127540218 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W313817514 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W3138915827 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W51115651 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W86382865 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2185262378 @default.
• W2339735525 hasRelatedWork W2609313076 @default.
• W2339735525 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W2339735525 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2339735525 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2339735525 magId "2339735525" @default.
• W2339735525 workType "article" @default.