FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2340100838> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2340100838 endingPage "40" @default.
• W2340100838 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2340100838 abstract "Background This article examines the contemporary implications of the Milliken v. Bradley (1974) decision for educational inequality between school districts in U.S. metropolitan areas. We focus upon four metropolitan areas that were highly segregated in the 1970s but which met different fates in court: We first examine Detroit and Philadelphia, where plaintiffs sought but ultimately failed to obtain a metropolitan-wide desegregation ruling. We then examine St. Louis, where a court imposed a metropolitan desegregation remedy. We finally include Jefferson County, where the court order resulted in a merger of city and suburban schools. Objective Through this comparative analysis we seek to tease out the effects of the ruling on patterns of inequity between urban and suburban school districts over time. We specifically examine how districts within these metro areas differed over time in terms of patterns of school segregation, fiscal resources, and academic performance. Research Design We employed qualitative case study methodology. We purposively selected three case study districts within each of the four metro areas (total of 12 school districts) based on their contextual status in 1970, i.e., whether they were in each of these three categories: urban, segregated suburban, or affluent suburban. We compared them along three dimensions: patterns of segregation, academic outcomes, and fiscal resources. Conclusions We found that the segregated and high poverty districts in the three metro areas where courts left districts intact (Detroit, Philadelphia, and St. Louis) have been, since Milliken, increasingly hemmed in by their boundaries: struggling with growing concentrations of need, low resources to meet those needs, and as a result falling into fiscal and academic decline. In contrast, the maintenance of district boundaries by the courts has allowed the affluent suburbs in these contexts, over time, to benefit from a number of policies and practices that allowed them to accrue and protect advantage through exclusionary zoning policies and housing discrimination. Together, these policies have promoted and protected the affluence and advantage in each of these contexts, which has in turn attracted investment and allowed these districts to maintain strong financial standing over time. Our study suggests that socially constructed political boundaries, like school district boundary lines, by carving up political geography along the lines of race and class, can take on an active role in the reproduction of inequality." @default.
• W2340100838 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2340100838 creator A5011212503 @default.
• W2340100838 creator A5057172910 @default.
• W2340100838 creator A5078591140 @default.
• W2340100838 date "2016-03-01" @default.
• W2340100838 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2340100838 title "Challenging Boundaries, Changing Fate? Metropolitan Inequality and the Legacy of Milliken" @default.
• W2340100838 cites W115125121 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W1966527251 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2008469767 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2026564882 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2042218845 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2058804226 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2275660416 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2464345912 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2796742820 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2797111473 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W2889201186 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W4238510746 @default.
• W2340100838 cites W4293402844 @default.
• W2340100838 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800303" @default.
• W2340100838 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2340100838 type Work @default.
• W2340100838 sameAs 2340100838 @default.
• W2340100838 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382016 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382017 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382018 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382019 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382020 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382021 @default.
• W2340100838 countsByYear W23401008382022 @default.
• W2340100838 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2340100838 hasAuthorship W2340100838A5011212503 @default.
• W2340100838 hasAuthorship W2340100838A5057172910 @default.
• W2340100838 hasAuthorship W2340100838A5078591140 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C158739034 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C189326681 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C2779361081 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C45555294 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C134306372 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C144024400 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C158739034 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C162324750 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C166957645 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C17744445 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C189326681 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C199539241 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C205649164 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C2779361081 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C3116431 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C33923547 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C45355965 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C45555294 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C50522688 @default.
• W2340100838 hasConceptScore W2340100838C97460637 @default.
• W2340100838 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2340100838 hasLocation W23401008381 @default.
• W2340100838 hasOpenAccess W2340100838 @default.
• W2340100838 hasPrimaryLocation W23401008381 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W1970327333 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2068111545 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2345716902 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2578865972 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2764221411 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W3188371087 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W4235273658 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W4248482423 @default.
• W2340100838 hasRelatedWork W2562359898 @default.
• W2340100838 hasVolume "118" @default.
• W2340100838 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2340100838 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2340100838 magId "2340100838" @default.
• W2340100838 workType "article" @default.