FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2340976374> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2340976374 endingPage "9476" @default.
• W2340976374 startingPage "9476" @default.
• W2340976374 abstract "Objectives: There is a huge demand for medicinal bark in developing countries and this demand is growing fast due to it high market values. To assess the effects of bark functions and tree capacities to recover from various debarking practices, a two-year experiment was conducted and several local harvest practices were tested on Garcinia lucida.Methodology and Results: For each practice, 20 healthy trees were selected and harvested. Tree health was monitored every month and the total bark regrowth was calculated using planimetric techniques. In response to bark removal, G. lucida trees produced stilt-roots, sprouts and bark. Re-growth of bark was the most common strategy developed, with mean values ranging from 80 to 100% of trees. All stumps have developed sprouts, with an average number of 6 shoots per stump. The percentage of bark regrowth varies from 45 to 62% of the initial surface debarked for small trees and from 24 to 37% for large trees. A high rate of bark regeneration was found if narrow strips of bark remained on trees, from which bark was hardly removed from wood during harvest, probably characterized physiologically by a downward sap flow due to poor water supply in trees.Conclusions and application of findings: The study has discussed main findings on the experimental debarking of G. lucida and management implications, which would also apply to other species with the same response to bark stripping as source of raw materials for plant-based drug prospects in developing countries. Bark strip harvesting requires species-specific parameters to make it sustainable, taking into account : (i) the bark regeneration capacity (edge growth), which may allow repeated harvest on the same tree; and (ii) the physiological status (downward sap flow) of the tree at the time of harvest, as decisive factor triggering bark regrowth. Partial bark strip harvesting show good prospects for the implementation of long-term sustainable strip harvesting prescriptions, while sustainable stripping through ring-barking practice is unsuitable. Shoot growth and stilt-root development in G. lucida species allows for other management options than strip harvesting, including coppice management and domestication. However, there are major limitations in using regenerated bark, as the time required to re-attain preharvest bark thickness, as well as the chemical composition due to stress releasing mechanisms remain unknown.Keywords: medicinal bark regrowth, harvest practices, plant-based drug prospects, species recovering capacity, sprouting capacity" @default.
• W2340976374 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2340976374 creator A5053918541 @default.
• W2340976374 creator A5065891376 @default.
• W2340976374 creator A5091404403 @default.
• W2340976374 date "2016-04-04" @default.
• W2340976374 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2340976374 title "Tree response to bark harvest: the case of a medicinal species, <i>Garcinia lucida</i>, as source of raw materials for plant-based drug development" @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1557000164 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1582267961 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1965087440 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1966317443 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1974909250 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1980491497 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1980772387 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1981567712 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2013776140 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2032997873 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2044698477 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2047895620 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2048416149 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2050233112 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2067025780 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2070172415 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2080700118 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2082301910 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2088328752 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2094793373 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2113746267 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2127323421 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2130900530 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2137704910 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2147371306 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2149356576 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2149503773 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2171982569 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2314057000 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W2314783471 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W289120626 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W995486965 @default.
• W2340976374 cites W1852877816 @default.
• W2340976374 doi "https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v99i1.13" @default.
• W2340976374 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2340976374 type Work @default.
• W2340976374 sameAs 2340976374 @default.
• W2340976374 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742017 @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742018 @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742019 @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742020 @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742021 @default.
• W2340976374 countsByYear W23409763742022 @default.
• W2340976374 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2340976374 hasAuthorship W2340976374A5053918541 @default.
• W2340976374 hasAuthorship W2340976374A5065891376 @default.
• W2340976374 hasAuthorship W2340976374A5091404403 @default.
• W2340976374 hasBestOaLocation W23409763741 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C133446333 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C206139338 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C133446333 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C144027150 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C18903297 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C206139338 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C59822182 @default.
• W2340976374 hasConceptScore W2340976374C86803240 @default.
• W2340976374 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2340976374 hasLocation W23409763741 @default.
• W2340976374 hasOpenAccess W2340976374 @default.
• W2340976374 hasPrimaryLocation W23409763741 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W1602224818 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2027989916 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2047134548 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2100464275 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2119976708 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2157796563 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2468335957 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W2979999271 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W3215139134 @default.
• W2340976374 hasRelatedWork W770724554 @default.
• W2340976374 hasVolume "99" @default.
• W2340976374 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2340976374 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2340976374 magId "2340976374" @default.
• W2340976374 workType "article" @default.