FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2341570219> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2341570219 abstract "Background:: Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery is greatly related to the results of cephalometric analysis report. Manual analysis is time taking and if the precision and accuracy of this technique can be achieved by digital method, time is saved considerably. On the other hand digital programs have fewer errors compared to manual methods done by human. Any mistake in the process of analysis can lead to wrong diagnosis and treatment planning and finally treatment failure. Objectives:: The main aim of this study was to compare the linear and angular measures between the two methods, digital and manual. No significant difference between these measures in the two methods will result in that digital method can be used instead of manual in order to save time. Materials and Methods:: This study was conducted on 40 cephalometric images taken from a radiology clinic. The samples were analyzed by computer after determining key points. Romexis® (planmeca Romexis® cephalometric analysis) software was used for computer analysis. The samples were then printed and analyzed manually. At last all the measures obtained from 11 different landmarks by two observers were compared by interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability. Results:: The results of this study showed that the obtained data was 100 percent reliable. On the other hand no significant difference was observed in each of the evaluated landmarks between two methods. Conclusions:: It seems that cephalometric analysis software is not only reliable but also saves time and reduces manual analysis errors." @default.
• W2341570219 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2341570219 creator A5021024911 @default.
• W2341570219 creator A5028582295 @default.
• W2341570219 date "2015-06-13" @default.
• W2341570219 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2341570219 title "Comparison Between Digital and Ordinary Methods in Analyzing Cephalometric Radiographic Images" @default.
• W2341570219 cites W1985644482 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2012627624 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2022990771 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2022996319 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2054149289 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2070895449 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2083169522 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2096965086 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2118403604 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2133241847 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2135775637 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2155348287 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2157785997 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2169167684 @default.
• W2341570219 cites W2319041367 @default.
• W2341570219 doi "https://doi.org/10.17795/ijo-4862" @default.
• W2341570219 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2341570219 type Work @default.
• W2341570219 sameAs 2341570219 @default.
• W2341570219 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2341570219 countsByYear W23415702192020 @default.
• W2341570219 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2341570219 hasAuthorship W2341570219A5021024911 @default.
• W2341570219 hasAuthorship W2341570219A5028582295 @default.
• W2341570219 hasBestOaLocation W23415702191 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C126838900 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C154945302 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C29694066 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C2989005 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C33923547 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C36454342 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C41008148 @default.
• W2341570219 hasConceptScore W2341570219C71924100 @default.
• W2341570219 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2341570219 hasLocation W23415702191 @default.
• W2341570219 hasOpenAccess W2341570219 @default.
• W2341570219 hasPrimaryLocation W23415702191 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W1568701304 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W1988052614 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W2061731130 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W2096315527 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W2411545073 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W4230773746 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W4250549352 @default.
• W2341570219 hasRelatedWork W4322722608 @default.
• W2341570219 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2341570219 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2341570219 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2341570219 magId "2341570219" @default.
• W2341570219 workType "article" @default.