FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2342178794> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2342178794 endingPage "544" @default.
• W2342178794 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2342178794 abstract "Background/aims: The use of adaptive designs has been increasing in randomized clinical trials. Sample size re-estimation is a type of adaptation in which nuisance parameters are estimated at an interim point in the trial and the sample size re-computed based on these estimates. The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study was a randomized clinical trial assessing the impact of single- versus dual-antiplatelet therapy and control of systolic blood pressure to a higher (130–149 mmHg) versus lower (<130 mmHg) target on recurrent stroke risk in a two-by-two factorial design. A sample size re-estimation was performed during the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study resulting in an increase from the planned sample size of 2500–3020, and we sought to determine the impact of the sample size re-estimation on the study results. Methods: We assessed the results of the primary efficacy and safety analyses with the full 3020 patients and compared them to the results that would have been observed had randomization ended with 2500 patients. The primary efficacy outcome considered was recurrent stroke, and the primary safety outcomes were major bleeds and death. We computed incidence rates for the efficacy and safety outcomes and used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the hazard ratios for each of the two treatment interventions (i.e. the antiplatelet and blood pressure interventions). Results: In the antiplatelet intervention, the hazard ratio was not materially modified by increasing the sample size, nor did the conclusions regarding the efficacy of mono versus dual-therapy change: there was no difference in the effect of dual- versus monotherapy on the risk of recurrent stroke hazard ratios (n = 3020 HR (95% confidence interval): 0.92 (0.72, 1.2), p = 0.48; n = 2500 HR (95% confidence interval): 1.0 (0.78, 1.3), p = 0.85). With respect to the blood pressure intervention, increasing the sample size resulted in less certainty in the results, as the hazard ratio for higher versus lower systolic blood pressure target approached, but did not achieve, statistical significance with the larger sample (n = 3020 HR (95% confidence interval): 0.81 (0.63, 1.0), p = 0.089; n = 2500 HR (95% confidence interval): 0.89 (0.68, 1.17), p = 0.40). The results from the safety analyses were similar to 3020 and 2500 patients for both study interventions. Other trial-related factors, such as contracts, finances, and study management, were impacted as well. Conclusion: Adaptive designs can have benefits in randomized clinical trials, but do not always result in significant findings. The impact of adaptive designs should be measured in terms of both trial results, as well as practical issues related to trial management. More post hoc analyses of study adaptations will lead to better understanding of the balance between the benefits and the costs." @default.
• W2342178794 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2342178794 creator A5040184271 @default.
• W2342178794 creator A5040565358 @default.
• W2342178794 creator A5050205623 @default.
• W2342178794 creator A5082470043 @default.
• W2342178794 creator A5086609118 @default.
• W2342178794 date "2016-07-09" @default.
• W2342178794 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2342178794 title "A post hoc evaluation of a sample size re-estimation in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study" @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1480729244 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W191849520 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1924841915 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1953260577 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1969089397 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1972842691 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W1997783552 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2004850616 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2006107462 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2011983555 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2027538725 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2033780906 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2051413546 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2055222829 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2078021680 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2080979030 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2088115721 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2098375146 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2105601238 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2111188131 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2127023478 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2127242548 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2127422554 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2137825306 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2144024999 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2151051924 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2153108768 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2155799451 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2163071463 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2171991128 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W2187858172 @default.
• W2342178794 cites W4250108811 @default.
• W2342178794 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774516643689" @default.
• W2342178794 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5025324" @default.
• W2342178794 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27094488" @default.
• W2342178794 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2342178794 type Work @default.
• W2342178794 sameAs 2342178794 @default.
• W2342178794 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942017 @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942018 @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942019 @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942020 @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942022 @default.
• W2342178794 countsByYear W23421787942023 @default.
• W2342178794 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2342178794 hasAuthorship W2342178794A5040184271 @default.
• W2342178794 hasAuthorship W2342178794A5040565358 @default.
• W2342178794 hasAuthorship W2342178794A5050205623 @default.
• W2342178794 hasAuthorship W2342178794A5082470043 @default.
• W2342178794 hasAuthorship W2342178794A5086609118 @default.
• W2342178794 hasBestOaLocation W23421787942 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C61943457 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C105795698 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C126322002 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C127413603 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C129848803 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C168563851 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C203092338 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C204243189 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C207103383 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C2780645631 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C33923547 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C44249647 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C61943457 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C71924100 @default.
• W2342178794 hasConceptScore W2342178794C78519656 @default.
• W2342178794 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2342178794 hasLocation W23421787941 @default.
• W2342178794 hasLocation W23421787942 @default.
• W2342178794 hasLocation W23421787943 @default.
• W2342178794 hasLocation W23421787944 @default.
• W2342178794 hasOpenAccess W2342178794 @default.
• W2342178794 hasPrimaryLocation W23421787941 @default.
• W2342178794 hasRelatedWork W1991541693 @default.

• next