Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2343413410> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2343413410 abstract "Background: SILC can best be described as a procedure in evolution. There is no consensus on surgical technique and exclusion criteria for SILC and conflicting reports regarding the merits and demerits of this procedure are present in literature. Efforts to improve outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy heralded the advent of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compares single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC). Methods: All the 80 patients were operated by the same surgeon, all adult patients (>18years of age) with symptomatic cholelithiasis were included and were randomized to two groups, group A consisting of 40 patients undergoing SILC and group B consisting of 40 patients undergoing SLC. Patients with acute cholecystitis, empyema gall bladder, obstructive jaundice, choledocholithiasis, H/O ERCP or pancreatitis, previous abdominal surgery, pregnancy and major comorbidity were excluded. Results were compared with those of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC). Results: The mean operating time was 58.73 minutes as compared to 45.10 mins in SLC. Conversion to SLC was required in 4 patients with SILC and 4 patients’ required one extra port. Mean VAS pain scores at 1hours (6.18 versus 6.53, p=0.206), at 6 hours (5.6 versus 6.12, p=0.112), and next morning (4.85 versus 4.75, p=0.772). Mean VAS score (9.27 versus 6.67, p=0.05) and mean VCS score (1.25 versus 4.05, p=0.04) for cosmesis. Additional analgesic was required in 32.5% versus 45% (p= 0.251). Significance was calculated by student t test. A p value less than .05 was considered significant. Conclusions: Transumblical SILC is a superior alternative when cosmesis is considered and is comparable to SLC in terms of post-operative pain, hospital stay but the operative time is significantly more." @default.
- W2343413410 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2343413410 creator A5027479286 @default.
- W2343413410 creator A5053876601 @default.
- W2343413410 creator A5059281464 @default.
- W2343413410 creator A5077881029 @default.
- W2343413410 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W2343413410 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2343413410 title "To compare single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis: a prospective randomized study" @default.
- W2343413410 doi "https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20161164" @default.
- W2343413410 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2343413410 type Work @default.
- W2343413410 sameAs 2343413410 @default.
- W2343413410 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2343413410 countsByYear W23434134102021 @default.
- W2343413410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2343413410 hasAuthorship W2343413410A5027479286 @default.
- W2343413410 hasAuthorship W2343413410A5053876601 @default.
- W2343413410 hasAuthorship W2343413410A5059281464 @default.
- W2343413410 hasAuthorship W2343413410A5077881029 @default.
- W2343413410 hasBestOaLocation W23434134101 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C120398109 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C49040817 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConcept C86642149 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C120398109 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C121332964 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C141071460 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C168563851 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C2776641081 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C2780047204 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C2780943399 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C49040817 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C61434518 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C71924100 @default.
- W2343413410 hasConceptScore W2343413410C86642149 @default.
- W2343413410 hasLocation W23434134101 @default.
- W2343413410 hasOpenAccess W2343413410 @default.
- W2343413410 hasPrimaryLocation W23434134101 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W1563874638 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W1963519264 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2000574305 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2032285960 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2045003267 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2046717450 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2058141716 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2070193915 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2072301656 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2166273570 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2194908546 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2234819016 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2323090980 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2348144212 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2356477287 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2791213068 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2902454684 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W3002647897 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2504887767 @default.
- W2343413410 hasRelatedWork W2985181424 @default.
- W2343413410 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2343413410 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2343413410 magId "2343413410" @default.
- W2343413410 workType "article" @default.