FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2343871889> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2343871889 abstract "12.00 Changing gender roles are impacting how employment and household/childcare responsibilities are shared within a marriage. With evolving gender roles, the potential benefits and disadvantages of marriage, related to marital quality/satisfaction, may be changing for both women and men (Amato, Johnson, Booth, & Rogers, 2003, Kurdek, 2005). To further explore the issue of gender roles and changing perspectives on marriage, students (106 females, 38 males) at a public university in Texas participated in an on-line Qualtrics survey assessing attitudes towards egalitarian/traditional marriage (adapted from Deutsch, Kokot, & Binder, 2007), child-rearing responsibilities (adapted from Gere and Helwig, 2012), traditional/transcendent gender roles (Baber & Tucker, 2006), and hostile/benevolent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 2001). Participants rated an egalitarian marriage as most likely; 51% of participants rated both spouses working full time/dividing child care equally as “likely”/“very likely.” Although men, compared to women, were more likely to agree with working full-time while their partner assumed primary childcare/household responsibilities ( χ 2 =19.01, p <.00l), 27% of the men rated this “very unlikely.” For the companion item, women were more likely than men to agree with taking time off work for childcare while their partner worked full-time, ( χ 2 =15.86, p <.002), with 15% of the women rating this “very unlikely” (although 16% rated it “very likely”). Females agreed more than males ( t =-2.03, p <.05) with traditional child care attitudes; traditional child care attitudes correlated positively with both hostile ( r =.37, p <.001) and benevolent ( r =.39, p <.001) sexism but negatively with gender transcendence ( r =-.29, p =.001). As the institution of marriage changes in the U.S., moving away from “his” and “hers” marriages to more egalitarian marriages, the gender discrepancy in marital satisfaction is likely to continue decreasing, with more flexibility in marital styles and options continuing to increase. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:Table Normal;mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:;mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} 12.00 Changing gender roles are impacting how employment and household/childcare responsibilities are shared within a marriage. With evolving gender roles, the potential benefits and disadvantages of marriage, related to marital quality/satisfaction, may be changing for both women and men (Amato, Johnson, Booth, & Rogers, 2003, Kurdek, 2005). To further explore the issue of gender roles and changing perspectives on marriage, students (106 females, 38 males) at a public university in Texas participated in an on-line Qualtrics survey assessing attitudes towards egalitarian/traditional marriage (adapted from Deutsch, Kokot, & Binder, 2007), child-rearing responsibilities (adapted from Gere and Helwig, 2012), traditional/transcendent gender roles (Baber & Tucker, 2006), and hostile/benevolent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 2001). Participants rated an egalitarian marriage as most likely; 51% of participants rated both spouses working full time/dividing child care equally as “likely”/“very likely.” Although men, compared to women, were more likely to agree with working full-time while their partner assumed primary childcare/household responsibilities ( χ 2 =19.01, p <.00l), 27% of the men rated this “very unlikely.” For the companion item, women were more likely than men to agree with taking time off work for childcare while their partner worked full-time, ( χ 2 =15.86, p <.002), with 15% of the women rating this “very unlikely” (although 16% rated it “very likely”). Females agreed more than males ( t =-2.03, p <.05) with traditional child care attitudes; traditional child care attitudes correlated positively with both hostile ( r =.37, p <.001) and benevolent ( r =.39, p <.001) sexism but negatively with gender transcendence ( r =-.29, p =.001). As the institution of marriage changes in the U.S., moving away from “his” and “hers” marriages to more egalitarian marriages, the gender discrepancy in marital satisfaction is likely to continue decreasing, with more flexibility in marital styles and options continuing to increase. Gender Role Attitudes and Expectations for Marriage Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:Table Normal;mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:;mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}" @default.
• W2343871889 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2343871889 creator A5018287751 @default.
• W2343871889 date "2014-12-10" @default.
• W2343871889 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2343871889 title "Gender role attitudes and expectations for marriage" @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1515404353 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1590556438 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1971076320 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1982802282 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1983912405 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1995608716 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2005448159 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2005873471 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2019174406 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2041831924 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2049824078 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2051782330 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2052476605 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2052881990 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2055305244 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2055635664 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2062076033 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2067932772 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2070251990 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2076981266 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2092606550 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2094244696 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2121824362 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2156375878 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2163720333 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2171484638 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W2516846611 @default.
• W2343871889 cites W1989325760 @default.
• W2343871889 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2343871889 type Work @default.
• W2343871889 sameAs 2343871889 @default.
• W2343871889 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2343871889 countsByYear W23438718892020 @default.
• W2343871889 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2343871889 hasAuthorship W2343871889A5018287751 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConceptScore W2343871889C15744967 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConceptScore W2343871889C17744445 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConceptScore W2343871889C39549134 @default.
• W2343871889 hasConceptScore W2343871889C77805123 @default.
• W2343871889 hasLocation W23438718891 @default.
• W2343871889 hasOpenAccess W2343871889 @default.
• W2343871889 hasPrimaryLocation W23438718891 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W1558756493 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W1907267261 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W1967231966 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2004095202 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2011531059 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2012219811 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2026772849 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2035605672 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2036802801 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2041074130 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2042182304 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2082294090 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2082973280 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2089874542 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2157371867 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2160069959 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2379875488 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2611887321 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W2619388688 @default.
• W2343871889 hasRelatedWork W330445661 @default.
• W2343871889 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2343871889 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2343871889 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2343871889 magId "2343871889" @default.
• W2343871889 workType "article" @default.