FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2344071495> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2344071495 endingPage "697" @default.
• W2344071495 startingPage "696" @default.
• W2344071495 abstract "Where Are We Now? The management of large periacetabular defects after oncologic resections has always been one of the most technically demanding surgical interventions in orthopaedics. The appropriate treatment options generally include either amputation, internal hemipelvectomy, allograft composite reconstruction, or endoprosthetic replacement. However, each is, in its own way, a high-risk intervention. Bus and colleagues retrospectively studied a novel modular prosthesis with pelvic and hydroxyapatite-coated femoral fixation (LUMiC® prosthesis [implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany]) with a minimum multicenter followup of 24 months. The authors found that while dislocations were a common cause of failure (recurrent dislocations occurred in 9%, or four of 47 patients), a dual-mobility articulation lowered the risk of dislocation. And although loosening was found to be consistent with other published studies on other novel methods of pelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction [2, 4], infection was the most common complication reported. The authors did note that the majority of the infections were successfully managed with débridement and antibiotics. Where Do We Need To Go? Although this study certainly adds promise to the armamentarium of prosthetic pelvic reconstruction options, it remains unclear whether cemented or uncemented femoral fixation differs in terms of overall durability, and whether silver coating of the acetabulum leads to fewer infections. How Do We Get There? A larger study size with long-term followup will help to elucidate these issues. Additionally, the authors may consider utilizing a functional outcome measurement tool such as the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, or the Barthel Index to determine if this prosthesis adds functional benefits compared to historical interventions such as external hemipelvectomy and internal hemipelvectomy with or without reconstruction. Long-term functional outcomes are similar between patients who underwent external hemipelvectomy and complex limb sparing endoprosthetic reconstruction. In today's cost conscious healthcare environment, answers to such questions may become increasingly important [1, 3, 5]. Lastly, as is noted by the authors, periacetabular reconstruction surgery has a substantial learning curve and it is entirely plausible that the benefits of this intervention might only be achievable in experienced hands. Future studies should attempt to identify differences in durability and functional outcomes between patients with primary bone sarcomas and other oncologic diagnoses such as metastatic carcinoma where age, comorbidities, and medical treatment may differ considerably." @default.
• W2344071495 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2344071495 creator A5082837447 @default.
• W2344071495 date "2017-03-01" @default.
• W2344071495 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2344071495 title "CORR Insights®: LUMiC® Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results" @default.
• W2344071495 cites W1969694630 @default.
• W2344071495 cites W2104774261 @default.
• W2344071495 cites W2139829630 @default.
• W2344071495 cites W2186876643 @default.
• W2344071495 cites W2292610474 @default.
• W2344071495 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4853-9" @default.
• W2344071495 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5289183" @default.
• W2344071495 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27116207" @default.
• W2344071495 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2344071495 type Work @default.
• W2344071495 sameAs 2344071495 @default.
• W2344071495 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2344071495 countsByYear W23440714952022 @default.
• W2344071495 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2344071495 hasAuthorship W2344071495A5082837447 @default.
• W2344071495 hasBestOaLocation W23440714951 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C2776204877 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C2778674656 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConcept C72202192 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C141071460 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C2776204877 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C2778336525 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C2778674656 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C2778715743 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C68312169 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C71924100 @default.
• W2344071495 hasConceptScore W2344071495C72202192 @default.
• W2344071495 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2344071495 hasLocation W23440714951 @default.
• W2344071495 hasLocation W23440714952 @default.
• W2344071495 hasLocation W23440714953 @default.
• W2344071495 hasLocation W23440714954 @default.
• W2344071495 hasOpenAccess W2344071495 @default.
• W2344071495 hasPrimaryLocation W23440714951 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W1977152320 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2027185553 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2028883468 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2047737583 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2134824126 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2141539663 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2164676947 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2416790921 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W2419105374 @default.
• W2344071495 hasRelatedWork W29930896 @default.
• W2344071495 hasVolume "475" @default.
• W2344071495 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2344071495 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2344071495 magId "2344071495" @default.
• W2344071495 workType "article" @default.