Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2344332476> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2344332476 endingPage "257" @default.
- W2344332476 startingPage "249" @default.
- W2344332476 abstract "The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that a criminal defendant has the right to counsel for his defense, and the Fourteenth Amendment states that defendants must be provided due process and equal protection under law. Despite this, it is unclear whether indigent defendants in the United States-who are disproportionately ethnic minorities-are receiving such protections when it comes to the defense of their criminal cases. Approximately 80 percent of criminal defendants require court-appointed counsel because they are indigent. Many have questioned whether the case outcomes of defendants with court-appointed counsel are equivalent to those of defendants with retained counsel (Marcus, 1994).The focus of this note is a public defender system. Public defender systems have been subject to much criticism because of the problems that some jurisdictions face. Many systems are underfunded, resulting in low salaries for attorneys and insufficient legal and support staff. The lack of funds and staff can result in overwhelming caseloads (Calogero, 1995; Drecksel, 1991; Marcus, 1994; Ogletree, 1995). It appears that one of the biggest problems facing all indigent defense systems is funding. Funding can affect the quality of services provided if there are not enough resources to do the job adequately. The current study addressed this issue by examining the public defender system in a northern Florida county. Effectiveness can be measured in a number of ways, including client satisfaction, number of dismissals, and favorable outcomes. This study focused simply on whether public defenders are able to obtain similar sentences for their clients when compared with private attorneys, controlling for relevant case characteristics such as charge seriousness and prior record. The state of Florida is considered to have an above-average public defender system (Spangenberg Group, 1996); therefore, negative results attributed to a good public defender system could have strong policy implications." @default.
- W2344332476 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2344332476 creator A5032202202 @default.
- W2344332476 date "2013-12-31" @default.
- W2344332476 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2344332476 title "A Comparison of Sentencing Outcomes for Defendants with Public Defenders Versus Retained Counsel in a Florida Circuit Court" @default.
- W2344332476 cites W1549716657 @default.
- W2344332476 cites W2069815930 @default.
- W2344332476 cites W2316295342 @default.
- W2344332476 cites W2331116703 @default.
- W2344332476 cites W2889498638 @default.
- W2344332476 cites W601560127 @default.
- W2344332476 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2002.10767668" @default.
- W2344332476 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2344332476 type Work @default.
- W2344332476 sameAs 2344332476 @default.
- W2344332476 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2344332476 countsByYear W23443324762018 @default.
- W2344332476 countsByYear W23443324762021 @default.
- W2344332476 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2344332476 hasAuthorship W2344332476A5032202202 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C2779137516 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C2909081578 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C2910235986 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C504945742 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C102587632 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C144024400 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C17744445 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C199539241 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C2776154427 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C2778272461 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C2779137516 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C2909081578 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C2910235986 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C504945742 @default.
- W2344332476 hasConceptScore W2344332476C73484699 @default.
- W2344332476 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2344332476 hasLocation W23443324761 @default.
- W2344332476 hasOpenAccess W2344332476 @default.
- W2344332476 hasPrimaryLocation W23443324761 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1487823919 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1512775402 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1522799478 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1544532424 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1548991931 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1557562760 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W1970998741 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2000784630 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2048793233 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2049840100 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2134569080 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2154207454 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2189460850 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W250333394 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2918553408 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2945395635 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W2996480005 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W3121554556 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W3122150754 @default.
- W2344332476 hasRelatedWork W345864815 @default.
- W2344332476 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W2344332476 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2344332476 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2344332476 magId "2344332476" @default.
- W2344332476 workType "article" @default.