Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2345079897> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- W2345079897 abstract "Dissent (dissenting opinion) in a case of corruption is a clear disapproval of one or more judges of the decisions agreed upon by the majority of the judges who decide cases and is based on the belief that an independent judge who is seen as a way to realize the independence of judges in our opinion. Formulation of the problem is 1) Why do I have a difference of opinion (dissenting opinion) among the judges in the panel discussion on corruption cases? 2) How do I judge to resolve differences of opinion in regard corruption cases? 3) What are the implications of the decision of a dissenting opinion connected with justice and justice for the defendant in a case of corruption ?. This type of research is Sosioligis. Source data, Primary and Secondary Data. Data collection techniques used were interviews and document study. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusion The results of the study 1) there are three factors that cause dissent (dissenting opinion) that is a factor of confidence, feel more true and suspicion factor 2) How to judge resolve differences of opinion in the Assembly that the Chairman of the Assembly meetings will be an understanding, if not consensus tercapat then deliberation postponed to proceed with the next deliberation and if consensus is not reached then the Chairman of the Assembly also would allow judges dessenter make legal considerations alone 3) the implications of the decision dissenting opinions can be favorable to the accused and can also harm the defendant himself. Keywords : Dissenting Opinion, Resolution, Implications" @default.
- W2345079897 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2345079897 creator A5000707600 @default.
- W2345079897 creator A5059037410 @default.
- W2345079897 creator A5059653112 @default.
- W2345079897 date "2015-07-04" @default.
- W2345079897 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2345079897 title "DISSENTING OPINION DALAM SISTIM PERADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kasus pada Pengadilan Tipikor Padang)" @default.
- W2345079897 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2345079897 type Work @default.
- W2345079897 sameAs 2345079897 @default.
- W2345079897 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2345079897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2345079897 hasAuthorship W2345079897A5000707600 @default.
- W2345079897 hasAuthorship W2345079897A5059037410 @default.
- W2345079897 hasAuthorship W2345079897A5059653112 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C134698397 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C2776946740 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C47855350 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C523173360 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C56617239 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C134698397 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C17744445 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C199539241 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C2776946740 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C2778272461 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C47855350 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C523173360 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C56617239 @default.
- W2345079897 hasConceptScore W2345079897C94625758 @default.
- W2345079897 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2345079897 hasLocation W23450798971 @default.
- W2345079897 hasOpenAccess W2345079897 @default.
- W2345079897 hasPrimaryLocation W23450798971 @default.
- W2345079897 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W2345079897 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2345079897 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2345079897 magId "2345079897" @default.
- W2345079897 workType "article" @default.