FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2362076407> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2362076407 abstract "This paper reports a study on the provision of teachers’ corrective feedback (CF) and its effect on learners’ uptake in Chinese EFL classrooms. It investigated what CF strategies were used and examined the effect of error types on strategy choice as well as the effect of CF strategies on learners’ response. The subjects were four teachers and 89 English majors from a foreign language school and a top university. Data were collected through 40 class hours of classroom observation and interviews carried out with the four teachers. The CF strategies used were then analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The findings are summarized as follows: 1. In Chinese EFL classrooms, a new type of CF was included, namely, nonverbal signals. With nonverbal signals, teachers could use gestures or facial expressions to indicate the existence of errors in students’ utterance. Altogether teachers provided seven types of CF in Chinese senior-school and college EFL classrooms: explicit correction, recast, clarification request, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation, repetition and nonverbal signals. All of the seven CF types can be explicit or implicit, input-providing or output-prompting. Implicit/input- providing feedback dominates in the different CF types. 2. Different error types led to different choice of feedback strategies. Discourse errors attracted greatest attention from teachers who showed much more tolerance for syntactic errors than other CF types. Recasts, as implicit/input-providing feedback, were still used most frequently in treating all the error types while teachers tended to prompt students’ self correction when lexical and discourse errors occurred in order to make error correction salient to learners. 3. Output-prompting feedback worked more effectively in eliciting learners’ uptake than input- providing strategies did. But input-providing feedback moves yielded a lower needs-repair rate, which means students could do self-correction more successfully when offered with input-providing feedback.The results reveal that different CF strategies can be used according to the nature of errors and thus will yield different responses from learners. Based on these findings, the study suggests that teachers should employ different feedback strategies to improve their teaching qualities." @default.
• W2362076407 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2362076407 creator A5074370460 @default.
• W2362076407 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2362076407 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2362076407 title "An Investigation into Teachers’ Corrective Feedback in Chinese EFL Classrooms" @default.
• W2362076407 cites W1508078757 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W1963931752 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W1994657794 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2001917795 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2002304296 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2008900454 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2009048230 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2011907483 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2014073462 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2021814190 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2044275064 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2051510403 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2054809795 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2073789142 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2076162959 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2088056535 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2088907534 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2092748479 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2094932222 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2095775776 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2100069851 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2118717069 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2128928398 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2132431806 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2137839802 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2145318047 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2145998149 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2152496361 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2152615458 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2155071014 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2155704020 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2166404386 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2167390525 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2169598461 @default.
• W2362076407 cites W2486835681 @default.
• W2362076407 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2012-0035" @default.
• W2362076407 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2362076407 type Work @default.
• W2362076407 sameAs 2362076407 @default.
• W2362076407 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2362076407 countsByYear W23620764072019 @default.
• W2362076407 countsByYear W23620764072022 @default.
• W2362076407 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2362076407 hasAuthorship W2362076407A5074370460 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConcept C2779305910 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConceptScore W2362076407C145420912 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConceptScore W2362076407C15744967 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConceptScore W2362076407C2779305910 @default.
• W2362076407 hasConceptScore W2362076407C41008148 @default.
• W2362076407 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2362076407 hasLocation W23620764071 @default.
• W2362076407 hasOpenAccess W2362076407 @default.
• W2362076407 hasPrimaryLocation W23620764071 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2791575529 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2893467525 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2899872056 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W3007191706 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W3046556085 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W3164368351 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W4213266652 @default.
• W2362076407 hasRelatedWork W2998735842 @default.
• W2362076407 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2362076407 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2362076407 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2362076407 magId "2362076407" @default.
• W2362076407 workType "article" @default.