FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2364450135> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2364450135 endingPage "140" @default.
• W2364450135 startingPage "132" @default.
• W2364450135 abstract "With the increase in the number of systematic reviews available, a logical next step to provide decision makers in healthcare with the evidence they require has been the conduct of reviews of existing systematic reviews. Syntheses of existing systematic reviews are referred to by many different names, one of which is an umbrella review. An umbrella review allows the findings of reviews relevant to a review question to be compared and contrasted. An umbrella review's most characteristic feature is that this type of evidence synthesis only considers for inclusion the highest level of evidence, namely other systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A methodology working group was formed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to develop methodological guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review, including diverse types of evidence, both quantitative and qualitative. The aim of this study is to describe the development and guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review.Discussion and testing of the elements of methods for the conduct of an umbrella review were held over a 6-month period by members of a methodology working group. The working group comprised six participants who corresponded via teleconference, e-mail and face-to-face meeting during this development period. In October 2013, the methodology was presented in a workshop at the Joanna Briggs Institute Convention. Workshop participants, review authors and methodologists provided further testing, critique and feedback on the proposed methodology.This study describes the methodology and methods developed for the conduct of an umbrella review that includes published systematic reviews and meta-analyses as the analytical unit of the review. Details are provided regarding the essential elements of an umbrella review, including presentation of the review question in a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format, nuances of the inclusion criteria and search strategy. A critical appraisal tool with 10 questions to help assess risk of bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was also developed and tested. Relevant details to extract from included reviews and how to best present the findings of both quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews in a reader friendly format are provided.Umbrella reviews provide a ready means for decision makers in healthcare to gain a clear understanding of a broad topic area. The umbrella review methodology described here is the first to consider reviews that report other than quantitative evidence derived from randomized controlled trials. The methodology includes an easy to use and informative summary of evidence table to readily provide decision makers with the available, highest level of evidence relevant to the question posed." @default.
• W2364450135 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5000755686 @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5026812362 @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5051888301 @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5066152709 @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5068524232 @default.
• W2364450135 creator A5070889122 @default.
• W2364450135 date "2015-09-01" @default.
• W2364450135 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2364450135 title "Summarizing systematic reviews" @default.
• W2364450135 cites W144336581 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2003178123 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2014143330 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2067384918 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2079283960 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2111011000 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2119790985 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2146812965 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2156100542 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W2316748172 @default.
• W2364450135 cites W4230192055 @default.
• W2364450135 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055" @default.
• W2364450135 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26360830" @default.
• W2364450135 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2364450135 type Work @default.
• W2364450135 sameAs 2364450135 @default.
• W2364450135 citedByCount "1001" @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352016 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352017 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352018 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352019 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352020 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352021 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352022 @default.
• W2364450135 countsByYear W23644501352023 @default.
• W2364450135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5000755686 @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5026812362 @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5051888301 @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5066152709 @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5068524232 @default.
• W2364450135 hasAuthorship W2364450135A5070889122 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C109359841 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C127413603 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C15744967 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C17744445 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C189708586 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C199539241 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C2779473830 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C509550671 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C539667460 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C55587333 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C71924100 @default.
• W2364450135 hasConceptScore W2364450135C77805123 @default.
• W2364450135 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2364450135 hasLocation W23644501351 @default.
• W2364450135 hasLocation W23644501352 @default.
• W2364450135 hasOpenAccess W2364450135 @default.
• W2364450135 hasPrimaryLocation W23644501351 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W2043902988 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W2111416713 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W2115099528 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W2262333527 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W3006244985 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W3029969037 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W4230570618 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W4249380099 @default.
• W2364450135 hasRelatedWork W4285202453 @default.
• W2364450135 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2364450135 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2364450135 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2364450135 magId "2364450135" @default.
• W2364450135 workType "article" @default.