Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2365782022> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W2365782022 abstract "Objective To explore the efficacy and adverse effects of different dose of capecitabine in the maintenance treatment for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomized into three groups evenly. In control group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 80 mg/m2d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles. In high dose maintanance group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 80 mg/m2d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles, then Capecitabine maintenance treatment was carried out with1 000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days. In low dose maintance group, patients were given Taxol 135 mg/m2d1 plus Cisplatin80 mg/m2d1, which were repeated every three weeks and totally for four cycles and Capecitabine maintenance treatment was then carried out with 1 000 mg/m2 qd for 14 days. Results All 120 patients involved had evaluable lesions.The PR+CR rates of control group, high dose maintance group and low dose maintance group were 45.0%(18/40),50%(20/40) and 47.5%(19/40) respectively. The ratios of TTP of those three groups were(5.650 ± 0.207) months,(8.900 ± 0.849) months and(8.400 ± 1.684) months respectively, and the ratios of MST were(11.3 ± 0.434) months,(17.8±1.641) months, and(16.9±3.422) months respectively. One-year survival rates of the three groups were 27.5%(11/40), 70.0%(28/40) and 52.5%(21/40) respectively. There were no significant differences among the three groups in PR+CR rate(P0.05), while there were significant differences among the three groups in one-year survival rate,TTP and MST(P0.05). For the toxicity, there was significant difference between high dose maintanance group and low dose maintanance group in gastrointestinal reaction, while there were no significant differences in hematological toxicity or hand-foot syndrome(P0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the efficacy of Capecitabine maintenance treatment is good. The gastrointestinal toxicity of low dose group is milder than that of high dose one. Low dose Capecitabine maintenance treatment is convenient for long-term use." @default.
- W2365782022 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2365782022 creator A5074911813 @default.
- W2365782022 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W2365782022 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2365782022 title "Clinical study on different dose of capecitabine in the maintenance treatment for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma" @default.
- W2365782022 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2365782022 type Work @default.
- W2365782022 sameAs 2365782022 @default.
- W2365782022 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2365782022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2365782022 hasAuthorship W2365782022A5074911813 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C2776694085 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C2777909004 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C2778239845 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C2778997737 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C2780456651 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C121608353 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C126322002 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C141071460 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C168563851 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C197934379 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C2776694085 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C2777909004 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C2778239845 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C2778997737 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C2780456651 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C509974204 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C526805850 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C71924100 @default.
- W2365782022 hasConceptScore W2365782022C90924648 @default.
- W2365782022 hasLocation W23657820221 @default.
- W2365782022 hasOpenAccess W2365782022 @default.
- W2365782022 hasPrimaryLocation W23657820221 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W1844887307 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2004666080 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2031654287 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2085952673 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2087311540 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2278119872 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2347640406 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2353196186 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2361836093 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2366073977 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2368279076 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2369458440 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2373703710 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2375397633 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2376461675 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2376981871 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2391880402 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2409312725 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2416720535 @default.
- W2365782022 hasRelatedWork W2184232062 @default.
- W2365782022 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2365782022 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2365782022 magId "2365782022" @default.
- W2365782022 workType "article" @default.