FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2367252011> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2367252011 abstract "Objective To evaluate the clinical effcet of continuous suction and intermittent suction of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) on promoting the granulation growth and the coverage of free flap transplantation. Methods The patients treated with VSD in our hospital from October 2010 to March 2011 were selected as the researching objects and divided into continuous suction group and intermittent suction group. The injured position was debrided and filled with VSD in operation room and drainage tube of VIB were connected to the negative pressure suction bottle. The patients in continuous suction group received the continuous suction for 7 days, while the intermittent suction group received suction for 2 hours and stoped for 2 hours last for 7 days. The VSD was removed in operation room after 7 days (note for first removal), and the wound were evaluated including the cleaness, granulation growth and germiculture. Split-thickness skin autograft was taken and the wound was filled with VSD secondly. The suction ways were as above. The VSD was removed after 10 days (note for second removal), the skin survival and infection around the wound were observed. The drainage situation of suction tube including clear and blocking were recorded. Results 84 patients had involved in this study with 47 cases in continuous suction group and 37 cases in intermittent suction group. At the first removal of VSD, the granulation growth of wound in two groups had no significant difference; no infection was found in the wound and the thicknesses of granulation were the same in two groups; bacteria cultures were negative in both groups. At the second removal of VSD, the continuous suction group had no case of skin necrosis, while intermittent suction group had 2 cases of part skin necrosis; no infection was found in both groups. The frequency of suction tube jam in continuous suction group was 62 with 53 in first removal and9 in second removal; while the intermittent suction group was 85 with 72 in first removal and 13 in second removal; the difference of toal jam frequency in two groups had statistically significant (P =0.014); but the jam frequency in the first removal and in the second removal between two groups had no significant difference (P =0.054, P =0.210). Conclusions Continuous suction and intermittent suction has no significant difference in promoting the granulation growth, but intermittent suction has higher frequency of jam compared with continuous suction, which means that more comprehensive care should be taken in intermittent suction." @default.
• W2367252011 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2367252011 creator A5078010043 @default.
• W2367252011 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2367252011 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2367252011 title "Clinical Control Study of Continuous Suction and Intermittent Suction of Vacuum Sealing Drainage" @default.
• W2367252011 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2367252011 type Work @default.
• W2367252011 sameAs 2367252011 @default.
• W2367252011 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2367252011 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2367252011 hasAuthorship W2367252011A5078010043 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C23795335 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C2776055305 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C127413603 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C141071460 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C23795335 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C2776055305 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C2780269544 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C42219234 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C71924100 @default.
• W2367252011 hasConceptScore W2367252011C78519656 @default.
• W2367252011 hasLocation W23672520111 @default.
• W2367252011 hasOpenAccess W2367252011 @default.
• W2367252011 hasPrimaryLocation W23672520111 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2004961957 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2132667895 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2304368754 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2351309790 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2356280699 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2357208440 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2357391772 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2364768030 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2367080736 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2367168738 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2370770716 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2374272533 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2375321465 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2378641132 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2382042869 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2383598706 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2386052092 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W2389351655 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W3029841102 @default.
• W2367252011 hasRelatedWork W3031439293 @default.
• W2367252011 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2367252011 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2367252011 magId "2367252011" @default.
• W2367252011 workType "article" @default.