FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2367646814> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2367646814 abstract "PURPOSE.To compare frequency- doubling technology (FDT) perimetry with standard automated perimetry (SAP) for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression in a longitudinal prospective study. METHODS. One eye of patients with open- angle glaucomawas tested every 6 monthswith both FDT and SAP. A minimum of 6 examinations with each perimetric technique was required for inclusion. Visual field progression was determined by two methods: glaucoma change probability (GCP) analysis and linear regression analysis (LRA). For GCP, several criteria for progression were used. The number of locations required to classify progression with FDT compared with SAP, respectively, was 1:2 (least conservative), 1:3, 2:3, 2:4, 2:6, 2:7, 3:6, 3:7, and 3:10 (most conservative). The number of consecutive examinations required to confirm progression was 2- of- 3, 2- of- 2, and 3- of- 3. For LRA, the progression criterion was any significant decline in mean threshold sensitivity over time in each of the following three visual field subdivisions: (1) all test locations, (2) locations in the central 10° and the superior and inferior hemifields, and (3) locations in each quadrant. Using these criteria, the proportion of patients classified as showing progression with each perimetric technique was calculated and, in the case of progression with both, the differences in time to progression were determined. RESULTS. Sixty- five patients were followed for a median of 3.5 years (median number of examinations, 9). For the least conservative GCP criterion, 32 (49% ) patients were found to have progressing visual fields with FDT and 32 (49% ) patients with SAP. Only 16 (25% ) patients showed progression with both methods, and in most of those patients, FDT identified progression before SAP (median, 12 months earlier). The majority of GCP progression criteria (15/27), classified more patients as showing progression with FDT than with SAP. Contrary to this, more patients showed progression with SAP than FDT, when analysed with LRA; e.g., using quadrant LRA 20 (31% ) patients showed progressionwith FDT, 23 (35% ) with SAP, and only 10 (15% ) with both. CONCLUSIONS. FDT perimetry detected glaucomatous visual field progression. However, the proportion of patients who showed progression with both FDT and SAP was small, possibly indicating that the two techniques identify different subgroups of patients. Using GCP, more patients showed progression with FDT than with SAP, yet the opposite occurred using LRA. As there is no independent qualifier of progression, FDT and SAP progression rates vary depending on the method of analysis and the criterion used." @default.
• W2367646814 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2367646814 creator A5013397997 @default.
• W2367646814 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2367646814 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2367646814 title "Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequencydoubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal pro- spective study" @default.
• W2367646814 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2367646814 type Work @default.
• W2367646814 sameAs 2367646814 @default.
• W2367646814 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2367646814 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2367646814 hasAuthorship W2367646814A5013397997 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C118487528 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C119767625 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C141071460 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C188816634 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C2776058522 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C2778527774 @default.
• W2367646814 hasConceptScore W2367646814C71924100 @default.
• W2367646814 hasLocation W23676468141 @default.
• W2367646814 hasOpenAccess W2367646814 @default.
• W2367646814 hasPrimaryLocation W23676468141 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W147651269 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W1939691828 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2001336947 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2002979675 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2009978990 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2028029276 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2052950599 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2068435740 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2105046732 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2114497077 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2125303367 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2156112838 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2184709100 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2431915313 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2549978459 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2601067305 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2750881538 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2896289703 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W3120756094 @default.
• W2367646814 hasRelatedWork W2071907595 @default.
• W2367646814 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2367646814 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2367646814 magId "2367646814" @default.
• W2367646814 workType "article" @default.