FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2369172227> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2369172227 abstract "The demand for DEM data has dramatically increased mainly due to the large number of possible applications capable to exploit DEM data.As in many other fields,with the Internet has become preferred and effective means of data exchange,the online purchasing and distribution of DEM can now be performed relative easily.It follows that the copyright protection is increasingly becoming more and more important.Watermarking represents a potentially effective tool for the protection and verification of ownership rights in DEM.But before applying watermarking techniques developed for multimedia applications to DEM,it is important that the requirements imposed by DEM are carefully analyzed to investigate whether they are compatible with existing watermarking techniques.On the basis of these motivations,an overview of watermarking is given,and the contribution of this work is twofold:①Assessment of the requirements imposed by the characteristics of DEM on watermark-based copyright protection is compared with usual digital images.In the multimedia field,watermark must be transparent to the human visual system.While in the DEM context,this requirement can be rephrased as altering the elevation precision and the results of application to an extent of DEM besides transparency.This is called near-lossless requirement in this paper.It is worth noticing that near-lossless is considered more necessary than robustness requirement.That is because almost nobody would attack DEMs with degraded quality.Adaptivity is another characteristic of DEM watermark technique.Generally speaking,DEMs required high precision could be embedded in less watermark energy.While DEMs required low precision are on the contrary.Since different precision standards are established for different landforms of DEM,watermark energy embedded should also change adaptively to landforms.It ensures that the watermarked DEM meets accuracy requirements of DEM as well as watermark energy could be inserted as much as possible.In addition,efficiency of watermark algorithms should also be considered.②Discussion of a case study where the performance of two popular,state-of-the-art watermarking techniques is evaluated by the light of the requirements at the previous point.One is based on block-based DCT techniques using Watson perceptual model,the other is based on DWT techniques using PWM perceptual model.The two algorithms are applied to a 512×512 DEM of Loess Plateau with a horizontal grid spacing of 5m.The watermark is a 64×64 binary image.In the experiment,watermarked DEMs are ensured transparent to the human visual system.In order to evaluate the impact of the watermark presence on DEM,we considered histogram,slope,slope of slope,contours,collection waterlines and terrain structure lines derived from the two watermarked DEMs.It has been shown that the presence of the watermark has almost no impacts on histogram.However,the results of the applicative tasks in digital terrain analysis are heavily affected not only in the human vision but also in values.As for the DWT algorithm,from which contours,collection waterlines and terrain structure lines derived all exhibit poorer precision.Obviously,watermarking techniques evaluated by human visual system don't always meet the requirements of elevation precision and applications of DEM.Watermark embedding should be very limited on avoiding DEM quality degradation.In the further,work will aim at the development of watermarking techniques specifically designed for DEM,so as to minimize the impact on the applications." @default.
• W2369172227 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2369172227 creator A5002146987 @default.
• W2369172227 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2369172227 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2369172227 title "Applicability of Watermarking Techniques to DEM" @default.
• W2369172227 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2369172227 type Work @default.
• W2369172227 sameAs 2369172227 @default.
• W2369172227 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2369172227 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2369172227 hasAuthorship W2369172227A5002146987 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C150817343 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C164112704 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C165696696 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C193470923 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C205711294 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C41608201 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C78548338 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C81081738 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C104317684 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C110875604 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C115961682 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C136764020 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C150817343 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C151730666 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C154945302 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C164112704 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C165696696 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C185592680 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C193470923 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C205711294 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C2779343474 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C2780233690 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C31972630 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C38652104 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C41008148 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C41608201 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C55493867 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C63479239 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C78548338 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C81081738 @default.
• W2369172227 hasConceptScore W2369172227C86803240 @default.
• W2369172227 hasLocation W23691722271 @default.
• W2369172227 hasOpenAccess W2369172227 @default.
• W2369172227 hasPrimaryLocation W23691722271 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W1587519823 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W1997083201 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2186302335 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2188699337 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2323219051 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2398415076 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2431691713 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2558490244 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2810599011 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2889042854 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2895808474 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2925063362 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2990261836 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W3025316321 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W3083341863 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W3137240539 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W3159591730 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W880041666 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2559836836 @default.
• W2369172227 hasRelatedWork W2947277585 @default.
• W2369172227 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2369172227 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2369172227 magId "2369172227" @default.
• W2369172227 workType "article" @default.