FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2373015275> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2373015275 abstract "【Objective】In order to provide data support for horticulture researchers and administrative decision makers, this study surveyed the basic research development status of horticulture based on papers published in SCI-indexed journals. 【Method】Bibliometric analysis was carried out to investigate the papers published in SCI-indexed journals during 2005-2014 with titles relevant to more than 60 kinds of common horticultural plants by using comparative analysis with Wo S citespace on annual distribution, average cited times without self-citations, h-index, countries(regions), institutions, publication in high-impact journals, research areas, hotspots, etc. 【Result】The study showed that the annual quantity of papers published in SCI-indexed journals had been increased year by year in the past decade and China had become the 2nd largest country in the number of papers after the USA. The number of Chinese horticultural papers became the largest in the world between 2010 and 2014. Comparing the papers with selected fruits as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers had risen from 8.40% to 15.68%, and the ranking had risen from 3rd to 2nd. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had risen from 5th to 4th, and the h-index had risen from 3rd to 2nd, in the top 10 countries of the paper records ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 4 to 7. Comparing the papers with selected vegetables(including melon watermelon) as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese papers had risen from 8.79% to 16.90%, and the ranking had remained at 2nd. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had remained 6th and the h-index ranking had risen from 5th to 2nd in the top 10 countries of the paper records ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 3 to 5. Comparing the papers with selected flowers tea as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese papers had risen from 14.12% to 26.14%, and the ranking had risen from 3rd to 1st. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had remained 7th and the h-index ranking had risen from 3rd to 2nd in the top 10 countries of the paper reorders ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 3 to 8. The number of Chinese horticultural papers published in high-impact biology journals increased rapidly during the past decade with its ranking rising from 8th to 5th. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 1 to 3. The analysis of research area showed that the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers was large in biochemistry and molecular biology, but smaller in the fields of entomology and agriculture. The research hotspots were high quality draft genome, fruit development and maturation and phenolic compound. 【Conclusion】The number of Chinese horticultural papers published in SCI-indexed journals has been increased in the past five years and the output has ranked 1st in the world, but the quality has not kept up with the quantity. Compared with part of the development countries, the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers was larger in basic research direction, but smaller in the areas which are closely related to traditional agronomy. In the future, more attentions should be paid to the problem-oriented research and the connection and contribution to problems in various links of the industry." @default.
• W2373015275 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2373015275 creator A5012611041 @default.
• W2373015275 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2373015275 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2373015275 title "Basic Research Development Status of Horticulture Based on Bibliometric Analysis" @default.
• W2373015275 cites W1994077089 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2006722068 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2010142529 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2104780365 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2128438887 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2131525457 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2158352615 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2369756996 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2374783371 @default.
• W2373015275 cites W2377588708 @default.
• W2373015275 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2373015275 type Work @default.
• W2373015275 sameAs 2373015275 @default.
• W2373015275 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2373015275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2373015275 hasAuthorship W2373015275A5012611041 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C178315738 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C136764020 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C144024400 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C161191863 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C166957645 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C17744445 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C178315738 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C189430467 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C191935318 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C205649164 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C23123220 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C2777382242 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C36289849 @default.
• W2373015275 hasConceptScore W2373015275C41008148 @default.
• W2373015275 hasLocation W23730152751 @default.
• W2373015275 hasOpenAccess W2373015275 @default.
• W2373015275 hasPrimaryLocation W23730152751 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W1497807008 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W1990074436 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W1997154257 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2017397071 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2050860843 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2128187908 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2331205301 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2368632478 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2382380205 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2472246787 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2517248762 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2518502566 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2557974713 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2623291876 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2737654735 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W2885024727 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W3111351897 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W3121216347 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W763873672 @default.
• W2373015275 hasRelatedWork W3141462850 @default.
• W2373015275 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2373015275 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2373015275 magId "2373015275" @default.
• W2373015275 workType "article" @default.