FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W23822893> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W23822893 endingPage "1122" @default.
• W23822893 startingPage "1085" @default.
• W23822893 abstract "IntroductionThe preoccupation with challenges posed by violent actors has long existed for many states, whether such actors are characterized as terrorists or insurgents, nonstate or paramilitary actors. The events of September 11, 2001, brought a new urgency and vibrancy to state action in realm of counterterrorism, illustrated by both response of national legal systems as well as more concerted efforts to achieve multilateral and multilevel counterterrorism reactions on international plane.1 From a feminist perspective, it is notable that terrorism and counterterrorism have long been of marginal interest to mainstream feminist legal theorizing.2 This is partly because of sustained absence of women's voices in regulation of armed conflict and war, as well as exclusion of women from war zone, aptly illustrated in Homer's pithy phrase that war constitutes killing and being killed.3 Men remain primary and visible actors in terrorist acts and counterterrorism responses. In legal field, a concentration on male actors has dominated national security conversations. There is no end of men in terrorism or counterterrorism discourses. When women come into view they typically do so as wives, daughters, sisters, and mothers of terrorist actors, or as archetypal victims of senseless terrorist acts whose effects on most vulnerable (women themselves) underscores unacceptability of terrorist targeting. Women remain marginal to conversations in which definitions of security are agreed upon and generally peripheral to institutional settings in which security frameworks are implemented as policy and law. Women perpetrators of terrorist violence are largely ignored or fetishized. Women scholars have generally not articulated a feminist on ways in which states respond to violent challengers.4 More particularly, legal quandaries that result from use of law as a management tool to address terrorism have not generally garnered a feminist response.There are, of course, caveats to some of my generalizations. A number of commentators have evidenced scholarly and policy interest in category of female combatants.5 Female terrorists - particularly those associated with violent politics of extremist jihadist groupings - have also recently incited attention.6 The preoccupation with violent (and generally presumed aberrational) female is, in itself, product of an essentialist discourse that requires a critical eye. Such short-term obsessions should not be read as emergence of women in terrorism and counterterrorism terrain as a counter-point of male demise. Historical and essentialist patterns of male combatancy and female victimhood remain alive and well in terrorism and counterterrorism discourses.7 In parallel, inquiries as to whether facially neutral antiterrorist laws have a gendered hue have historically not garnered much attention from either mainstream national security scholars or feminists deconstructing particular parts of legal apparatus, insofar as it affects women. Curiously, one can observe that international feminist discourses foregrounding women's insecurity and gendered dimensions of violence are leveraging from and have synergy with scholarly antiterrorism discourses emphasizing regulation of and responsibility for nonstate actors.8 There is sturdy legal and normative resonance across these conversations, in that both call for a similar shift[] in perspective that involves rethinking the entire basis of public/private dichotomy.9 The echoes of feminist language emphasizing insecurity in private sphere interact tidily with language that affirms ubiquity of security threats. Finally, there are threads of scholarly and policy thought that link violence against women as a warning sign for terrorism because [g]roups that engage in these sorts of attacks on civilians as a whole often pursue misogynist agendas and carry out, or advocate, severe forms of violence against women. …" @default.
• W23822893 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W23822893 creator A5043820304 @default.
• W23822893 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W23822893 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W23822893 title "Situating Women in Counterterrorism Discourses: Undulating Masculinities and Luminal Femininities" @default.
• W23822893 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W23822893 type Work @default.
• W23822893 sameAs 23822893 @default.
• W23822893 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W23822893 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W23822893 hasAuthorship W23822893A5043820304 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C203133693 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C2778757428 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C528167355 @default.
• W23822893 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C107993555 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C11413529 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C144024400 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C169437150 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C17744445 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C199539241 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C203133693 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C2777617010 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C2778757428 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C41008148 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C48103436 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C528167355 @default.
• W23822893 hasConceptScore W23822893C73484699 @default.
• W23822893 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W23822893 hasLocation W238228931 @default.
• W23822893 hasOpenAccess W23822893 @default.
• W23822893 hasPrimaryLocation W238228931 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1163700534 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1514718763 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1645369237 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1783187632 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1915361670 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1980378074 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W1995008889 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W205422084 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2054957992 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2184783193 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W220825236 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2214969097 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2398458757 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2588248092 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2609324317 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2726621719 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W2902290734 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W3122415475 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W3139355145 @default.
• W23822893 hasRelatedWork W152014368 @default.
• W23822893 hasVolume "93" @default.
• W23822893 isParatext "false" @default.
• W23822893 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W23822893 magId "23822893" @default.
• W23822893 workType "article" @default.