FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W23858824> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W23858824 abstract "2 INTRODUCTION 4 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROBLEM 5 DEFINITIONS 6 ASSUMPTIONS 7 LIMITATIONS 7 DELIMITATIONS 8 LITERATURE REVIEW 9 METHODOLOGY 18 FINDINGS 24 CONCLUSIONS 33 RECOMMENDATIONS 34 REFERENCES 35 Composite Hybrid Joints 2 Abstract Mechanical fasteners are commonly used in today’s composite aircraft adhesive joints. The primary purpose for using mechanical fasteners was to provide redundancy to the adhesive joints because of the uncertainties associated with an adhesive only joint. Therefore, the use of a fastener in a conventional composite hybrid joint was mainly a part of a fail-safe design. Acting as a safety backup, the fastener did not contribute tensile strength to the joint until the adhesive joint failed. When only being used for redundancy purposes in case of an adhesive joint failure, the existing fastener became simply an added weight to the aircraft structure. In this research, a proposed new design was incorporated into the composite hybrid joint where two different types of attachments were used in order to provide alternate load paths to redirect load to the fastener and utilize the fastener to provide strength to the joint once the joint was loaded. Two types of attachments were used: a stepped attachment and a curved attachment. The attachments would reduce the amount of load induced in the adhesive joint and increase the overall strength of the hybrid joint. Experiments were conducted with both the conventional hybrid joint and the new hybrid joint design with two different attachments to assess effectiveness of the new design, the more efficient attachment type, and whether the added weight of the attachments could be justified by the improvements in the overall strength of the joint. Each type of hybrid joints consisted of 15 specimens. A total of 45 specimens were prepared for this study. The specimens were tested with a MTS Systems Corporation testing apparatus with a 22 kip (±100kN) load cell. The ultimate tensile load data gathered were used to compare the strength of the different hybrid joints. From the tensile testing data collected of the three differentMechanical fasteners are commonly used in today’s composite aircraft adhesive joints. The primary purpose for using mechanical fasteners was to provide redundancy to the adhesive joints because of the uncertainties associated with an adhesive only joint. Therefore, the use of a fastener in a conventional composite hybrid joint was mainly a part of a fail-safe design. Acting as a safety backup, the fastener did not contribute tensile strength to the joint until the adhesive joint failed. When only being used for redundancy purposes in case of an adhesive joint failure, the existing fastener became simply an added weight to the aircraft structure. In this research, a proposed new design was incorporated into the composite hybrid joint where two different types of attachments were used in order to provide alternate load paths to redirect load to the fastener and utilize the fastener to provide strength to the joint once the joint was loaded. Two types of attachments were used: a stepped attachment and a curved attachment. The attachments would reduce the amount of load induced in the adhesive joint and increase the overall strength of the hybrid joint. Experiments were conducted with both the conventional hybrid joint and the new hybrid joint design with two different attachments to assess effectiveness of the new design, the more efficient attachment type, and whether the added weight of the attachments could be justified by the improvements in the overall strength of the joint. Each type of hybrid joints consisted of 15 specimens. A total of 45 specimens were prepared for this study. The specimens were tested with a MTS Systems Corporation testing apparatus with a 22 kip (±100kN) load cell. The ultimate tensile load data gathered were used to compare the strength of the different hybrid joints. From the tensile testing data collected of the three different Composite Hybrid Joints 3 types of specimens, the hybrid joints with attachments showed a significant improvement in ultimate tensile strength compared to the conventional hybrid joints. Conventional hybrid joints had an average ultimate tensile strength of 5859.99 lbf. Hybrid joints with curved attachments had an average ultimate tensile strength of 10617.62 lbf, which was 81.19% higher than the conventional hybrid joints. Hybrid joints with stepped attachments had an average ultimate tensile strength of 10342.14 lbf which was 76.49% higher than conventional hybrid joints. Hybrid joints with curved attachments were also found to be more efficient compared to hybrid joints with stepped attachments and improved the ultimate tensile strength 2.66%. Composite Hybrid Joints 4" @default.
• W23858824 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W23858824 creator A5021337679 @default.
• W23858824 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W23858824 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W23858824 title "The Effects of Adding Attachments in Conventional Composite Hybrid Joints on Tensile Strength" @default.
• W23858824 cites W1495875221 @default.
• W23858824 cites W1966840623 @default.
• W23858824 cites W1970255815 @default.
• W23858824 cites W1972950489 @default.
• W23858824 cites W1986331300 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2050607479 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2052455616 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2053135237 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2093745104 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2149393166 @default.
• W23858824 cites W2493609280 @default.
• W23858824 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W23858824 type Work @default.
• W23858824 sameAs 23858824 @default.
• W23858824 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W23858824 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W23858824 hasAuthorship W23858824A5021337679 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C152124472 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C155723203 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C15777418 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C18555067 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C2778240408 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W23858824 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C104779481 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C112950240 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C127413603 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C135628077 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C152124472 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C155723203 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C15777418 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C159985019 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C18555067 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C192562407 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C200601418 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C2778240408 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C2779227376 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C41008148 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C66938386 @default.
• W23858824 hasConceptScore W23858824C68928338 @default.
• W23858824 hasLocation W238588241 @default.
• W23858824 hasOpenAccess W23858824 @default.
• W23858824 hasPrimaryLocation W238588241 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W1505363323 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W1509044205 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W1970564046 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2025463791 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2041971033 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2056804170 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2071057230 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2101954065 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2260698625 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2407240886 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2653043511 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2735622675 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2742742821 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2796264134 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W3023396272 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W593479112 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W604555218 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W846976147 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W944628475 @default.
• W23858824 hasRelatedWork W2831080382 @default.
• W23858824 isParatext "false" @default.
• W23858824 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W23858824 magId "23858824" @default.
• W23858824 workType "article" @default.