FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2395289686> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2395289686 abstract "The reference-intensity-ratio method of quantitative X-ray diffraction is rapidly coming to the forefront of quantitative X-ray powder difraction analysis. Pawloski (1985) has completed quantitative analysis of prepared mixtures of fine-grained geologic materials by this procedure. Pawloski is to be commended for using this approach and for her method of obtaining reference-intensity constants from calibration curves by the intensity ratio/weight ratio slope method. Nevertheless, I believe that several experimental and interpretive difficulties arise in this paper and bring into question the application to Pawloski's samples, which I feel warrants some discussion here. As a point of clarification, it should be noted that Pawloski's constant K is the reciprocal ofthe well-established reference intensity constant, k, (Chung, I 974), also known as the reference intensity ratio RIR (Hubbard et al., 1976; Cline and Snyder, 1983), but with quartz as the reference material. The theoretical basis for Pawloski's approach is sound, in my opinion, but I have some concern over several other aspects of the presentation, briefly listed as follows: (l) the large size (between 35and 45-pm diameter) of the sample particles, (2) the backpacking procedure of sample mounting, (3) the manner in which the errors are presented, and (4) the use of diffused diffraction intensities for glass quantification. The efects of large particle size on X-ray diffraction are well known. The extreme variability of intensities from a layer ofparticles this coarse grained has been well documented by Wolffet al. (1965) and Klug and Alexander (1974). Since the number of particles (spheres) of a material found within a given volume varies as the diameter cubed, it is easy to show, for example, that there will be 125 times more 5-pm particles than 25-pm particles in a given component volume. Thus, the probability that a particle will have the proper orientation for constructive beam interference is increased by a like factor. Compared to a scan taken from the large particles, a set ofintensities from a sample of the smaller particles would not show the large variation in intensities on sample rotation as was observed for 20-30-pm particles by Wolffet al. (1965). Other effects were demonstrated by Cline and Snyder (1983), whose data showed a change in the referenceintensity-ratio values determined with AlrO3 as a standard as the particle size of the material being analyzed increased. This is also a common observation in our laboratory; that is, the reference-intensity ratio will increase markedly with decreasing particle size of the material being analyzed as a result of the reduction in microabsorption and primary extinction with decreasing particle slze. With regard to the second point, there are at least two techniques now available for the preparation of samples without introducing significant preferred orientation (Davis and Cho,1977: Davis and Johnson, 1982a,1982b:. Calvert et al., I 983; Cline and Snyder, I 983; Davis, I 984). One method used in our laboratory (Davis, 1984) consists ofaerosol suspension in a 4or 8-L aspiratorjar and collection on glass fiber filters with corresponding application of corrections for transparency and matrix effects. The sample particles are reduced to an average of under l0-pm diameter by mixer-mill pulverization for such samples. Actual sample loading takes from l-5 min. Since a large proportion of Pawloski's samples contains phyllosilicates and carbonates, it would appear that any sample preparation without due concern for preferred orientation would yield highly suspect results. I believe that the particle size and preferred orientation aspects just discussed will create reference-constant values such as presented in Pawloski's Table I that cannot be used for accurate quantitative analytical work. I have converted most of these K constant values into AlrO3based reference-intensity ratios as formally defined using the calculated qtartz k, as the common basis of conversion. Table I lists values given by Pawloski, values used in our laboratory's aerosol suspension inventory, and cal-" @default.
• W2395289686 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2395289686 creator A5051361492 @default.
• W2395289686 date "1987-01-01" @default.
• W2395289686 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2395289686 title "Quantitative determination of mineral content of geological samples by X-ray diffraction: Discussion" @default.
• W2395289686 cites W2144870608 @default.
• W2395289686 cites W2485206716 @default.
• W2395289686 cites W2495626400 @default.
• W2395289686 cites W2606909073 @default.
• W2395289686 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
• W2395289686 type Work @default.
• W2395289686 sameAs 2395289686 @default.
• W2395289686 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2395289686 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2395289686 hasAuthorship W2395289686A5051361492 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C113196181 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C207114421 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C2777027219 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConcept C93038891 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C105795698 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C113196181 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C120665830 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C121332964 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C165838908 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C185592680 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C192562407 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C199289684 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C199360897 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C207114421 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C2777027219 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C33923547 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C41008148 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C43617362 @default.
• W2395289686 hasConceptScore W2395289686C93038891 @default.
• W2395289686 hasLocation W23952896861 @default.
• W2395289686 hasOpenAccess W2395289686 @default.
• W2395289686 hasPrimaryLocation W23952896861 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W1507613907 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W153918907 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W1582780039 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W1987008075 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W199158101 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2008060979 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2018605005 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2028950665 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2085437273 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2091871416 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2170708986 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2388845260 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2611049304 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2890970654 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W2901840898 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W3021015823 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W3081329676 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W3105212577 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W58686574 @default.
• W2395289686 hasRelatedWork W3151637599 @default.
• W2395289686 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2395289686 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2395289686 magId "2395289686" @default.
• W2395289686 workType "article" @default.