FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2396603056> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2396603056 abstract "Supramodal Representations in Melodic Perception Ahnate Lim (ahnate@hawaii.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2530 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA Leonidas A. A. Doumas (alex.doumas@ed.ac.uk) Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh 7 George Square, Edinburgh, Midlothian EH8 9JZ, UK Scott Sinnett (ssinnett@hawaii.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2530 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA Abstract explicit learning of grammatical structures (Rohrmeier & Rebuschat, 2012), and complex event sequencing (Tillmann, 2012), to name but a few. Other approaches have sought to uncover links between musical training and performance in other domains such as mathematics, language, spatial- temporal abilities, and verbal memory (for a summary, see Rauscher, 2003). Thus it is clear that gaining a better understanding of the underlying processes and building blocks in music perception can aid towards understanding the underlying mechanisms and resources used in other cognition domains as well. Music is highly relational and in this manner shares much in common with other characteristically human behavior. While this may suggest that the processes used in music perception could be domain general, the nature and flexibility of these representations remain less understood. If the underlying representations and manipulations required for perceiving music overlap with those in other cognitive domains, it should be fairly easy to map such representations across domains. This hypothesis was tested and supported using a novel experiment with melodic stimuli in the auditory modality and analogous visual sequential stimuli (Gabor sequences) in the visual modality. Testing for transfer across the two modalities and for the two types of representations (contour and intervallic) was done through four counterbalanced conditions. Cross-modal mapping was successful in three out of the four conditions, implying general flexibility of representational transfer. Implications for representational flexibility, sequential learning and future studies are discussed. The Melody Keywords: Melodic perception; relation learning; cross- modal mapping; representations; categorization. Introduction As research techniques for studying human behavior and the brain have evolved, the underlying processes of music perception have continued to fascinate cognitive scientists and spur much research. Recent advances in neuroscience for example, have shown that the simple act of perceiving music involves distributed activity throughout the brain, including diverse regions such as Broca’s area (Fadiga, Craighero, & D’Ausilio, 2009), the pre-frontal cortex (Bengtsson, Csikszentmihalyi, & Ullen, 2007), as well as the amygdala (Limb, 2006). Indeed, many if not all of these regions are used in other tasks such as speech processing, for example (Koelsch et al., 2004). Given the integrated and distributed neurological underpinnings of music, it should come as no surprise that a host of relationships has been made between music and other areas of cognition. Aside from the common comparisons made between music and language, many have suggested that music may also help to aide us in understanding other behavior such as domain- general aesthetic preferences (Marcus, 2012), implicit and One of the most fundamental and salient aspects of music is the melody. Simple melodies consist of discrete units or notes, where each note is characterized by a pitch, or fundamental frequency (e.g., Hertz value). The core strategy humans use to process and store familiar melodies is through a relative pitch code (Attneave & Olson, 1971; Page, 1994). This relative pitch code stores the pitch sequence of a melody in terms of the relations or intervals (specific frequency differences) between each note. For example, the song Happy Birthday is immediately recognizable due to the unique intervals between each of the notes. That is, one immediately recognizes this song regardless of whether it starts on a low or high note due to the unique intervallic pattern between all subsequent notes. There is considerable evidence on the use of relative pitch information in adults through both behavioral (Dowling, 1978, 1988) as well as neuroimaging studies (Fujioka, Trainor, Ross, Kakigi, & Pantev, 2004; Trainor, McDonald, & Alain, 2002). In addition to relative pitch, the contour (general shape, or sequence of up and down movements in frequencies from note to note) is another characteristic upon which melodies can be categorized. Given the existence of these characteristics, the question remains as to how they contribute to a listener’s mental representation of a melody. Note that while a melody with the same contour as Happy Birthday but with a different intervallic sequence would be perceived as a completely different song, it would still have the same general “shape”, or up and down pattern. Although" @default.
• W2396603056 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2396603056 creator A5046684632 @default.
• W2396603056 creator A5070044658 @default.
• W2396603056 creator A5077937509 @default.
• W2396603056 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2396603056 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2396603056 title "Supramodal Representations in Melodic Perception." @default.
• W2396603056 cites W151157673 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1533632116 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1917359352 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W195845534 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1975017740 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1975361487 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1979104110 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W1994335990 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2005342022 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2006834822 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2007283628 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2010927954 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2019724682 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2024310757 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2026161499 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2038615843 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2059526390 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2061796397 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2069048595 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2069416551 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2081280660 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2088009352 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2093562142 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2096582452 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2098673318 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2099932321 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2101912971 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2102674732 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2104302934 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2114713184 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2123551819 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2125621289 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2143719445 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2143884780 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2146886996 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2148108292 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2316429719 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2321187925 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2477494244 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2566129194 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W2995814943 @default.
• W2396603056 cites W3204968249 @default.
• W2396603056 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2396603056 type Work @default.
• W2396603056 sameAs 2396603056 @default.
• W2396603056 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2396603056 countsByYear W23966030562016 @default.
• W2396603056 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2396603056 hasAuthorship W2396603056A5046684632 @default.
• W2396603056 hasAuthorship W2396603056A5070044658 @default.
• W2396603056 hasAuthorship W2396603056A5077937509 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C2780226545 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C43803900 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConcept C558565934 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C142362112 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C153349607 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C154945302 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C15744967 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C169760540 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C169900460 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C180747234 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C188147891 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C26760741 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C2780226545 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C41008148 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C43803900 @default.
• W2396603056 hasConceptScore W2396603056C558565934 @default.
• W2396603056 hasIssue "36" @default.
• W2396603056 hasLocation W23966030561 @default.
• W2396603056 hasOpenAccess W2396603056 @default.
• W2396603056 hasPrimaryLocation W23966030561 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W1976708444 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W1983932125 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W1995921430 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2005331755 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2007283628 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2076123736 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2083752659 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2118450042 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2141243067 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2151459154 @default.
• W2396603056 hasRelatedWork W2481769319 @default.

• next