FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2396925192> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2396925192 abstract "Modeling Multi-Agent Chaos: Killing Aliens and Managing Difficult People W. Korey MacDougall (warrenmacdougall@carleton.ca) Robert L. West (robert_west@carleton.ca) Emmanuelle Hancock (emme.hancock@gmail.com) Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Abstract Understanding macro cognition is important for understanding how experts and lay people function in the real world, and for building safer, more effective socio-technical systems. We present a framework and a methodology for creating and evaluating process models of highly dynamic expert tasks and illustrate it with two models. Keywords: Macro Cognition; Cognitive Modeling; Cognitive Architectures; Expertise; Videogame playing; Mediation; Introduction Collectively we have developed innumerable forms of expertise, differing wildly in their appearances. These range from trapping animals to space flight, poetry to plumbing. Beneath the extreme diversity of forms, however, there may be consistency in the structure and acquisition of expertise. It may be that expertise (and our capacity to develop it) is rather simple and straightforward, but that its manifestations are so varied because it emerges in many vastly different domains. This is akin to the point made by Herbert Simon’s famous “ant on the beach” metaphor (Simon, 1969), in which he argues that the apparent complexity of an ant’s behavior as it moves in a convoluted path across a beach is largely attributable to the complexity of the environment, and not to any sophisticated scheming or strategizing by the ant. We think it is worth investigating whether the situation is similar regarding human expertise, but feel that the techniques and concepts which would permit such a study are in need of further refinement. We offer here a prospective research methodology that we are developing to address this using the SGOMS macro architecture (West & Pronovost, 2009; West et al., 2013), and describe two models which we have constructed to test the method. The first model is of people playing a video game, “Gears of War 3” (produced by Epic Games) and the second is of professional mediators. Studying Experts Expertise is a topic of theoretical and practical importance in a number of fields, including psychology, sociology, artificial intelligence, and education. Its relevance to multiple communities has led to the development of varied conceptual frameworks that distinguish experts from non- experts according to mental capacities, experience over time, representation and organization of knowledge, elite achievement, status within a community, or reliably superior performance (Ericsson, 2006). From these conceptual frameworks have developed a number of methods for studying experts, including, inter alia, laboratory based methods (Chi, 2006), naturalistic observation (Ball & Ormerod, 2000), the engineering of expert systems (Fink & Lush, 1987), and simulation of expert behavior and cognition (West & Somers, 2011). Existing conceptions of expertise, and their associated research methodologies, have provided important insights into many aspects of expert performance, such as differences in knowledge representations between experts and novices (French et al., 1996), the psychological traits most frequently associated with the development of expertise (Shanteau, 1998), the importance of “deliberate practice” in acquiring mastery, (Ericsson, 2006), and the role of social factors and institutions in facilitating the development of expertise (Hunt, 2006). Additionally, AI- based research into expertise has led to the creation of a number of expert systems capable of supplementing or replacing the performance of human experts. Examples of these include systems for medical diagnosis (Saito & Nakano, 1988), hypothesis formation (Buchanan, Sutherland, & Feigenbaum, 1968), and chess analysis (Michie, 1972). There are, however, significant aspects of expertise which are not as amenable to investigation using existing frameworks. Specifically, these methods do not lead to a process model. That is, a model that, given the current state of the agent, the task, and the environment, can predict what the agent will do next. We are most interested in applying this approach to: expert performance in complex, chaotic, and real-world environments; the cooperation and coordination of multiple experts (i.e., teamwork); and consistencies in the cognitive activities and aptitudes of experts in different domains. Macro Architecture Hypothesis Cognition can be divided into micro and macro cognition (Klein et al, 2003). Micro-cognition refers to the mental activities studied in traditional cognitive psychology experiments, whereas macro-cognition refers to the forms of cognition that underlie functioning in complex, real-world tasks (West et al, 2013; Klein 2003). Concerns have been raised over whether the theories and methods embodied in micro-cognitive experimentation and modeling can be reasonably scaled up out of the lab and applied to the study of real-world cognition (Klein, 2003). One avenue by which this has been addressed is the development of unified cognitive architectures, such as ACT-R (Anderson, 1996), EPIC (Kieras & Meyer, 1997), and SOAR (Laird, Newell," @default.
• W2396925192 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2396925192 creator A5021013198 @default.
• W2396925192 creator A5051122928 @default.
• W2396925192 creator A5077488328 @default.
• W2396925192 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2396925192 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2396925192 title "Modeling Multi-Agent Chaos: Killing Aliens and Managing Difficult People" @default.
• W2396925192 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2396925192 type Work @default.
• W2396925192 sameAs 2396925192 @default.
• W2396925192 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2396925192 countsByYear W23969251922014 @default.
• W2396925192 countsByYear W23969251922018 @default.
• W2396925192 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2396925192 hasAuthorship W2396925192A5021013198 @default.
• W2396925192 hasAuthorship W2396925192A5051122928 @default.
• W2396925192 hasAuthorship W2396925192A5077488328 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C166955791 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C2776654903 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C111919701 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C138885662 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C14036430 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C144024400 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C154945302 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C15744967 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C166955791 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C169760540 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C169900460 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C188147891 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C199360897 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C2776654903 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C2778311575 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C38652104 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C41008148 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C41895202 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C78458016 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C86803240 @default.
• W2396925192 hasConceptScore W2396925192C98045186 @default.
• W2396925192 hasIssue "36" @default.
• W2396925192 hasLocation W23969251921 @default.
• W2396925192 hasOpenAccess W2396925192 @default.
• W2396925192 hasPrimaryLocation W23969251921 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W109648756 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W1490705387 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W1572214300 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W169625879 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W1833538180 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W1992111416 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2137486586 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2182468558 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2331930506 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2334521768 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2741783816 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2764668431 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W2772394292 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3001387259 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3009045295 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3106981569 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3155835247 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W315739146 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3198734529 @default.
• W2396925192 hasRelatedWork W3214376555 @default.
• W2396925192 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2396925192 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2396925192 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2396925192 magId "2396925192" @default.
• W2396925192 workType "article" @default.