FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2398255890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2398255890 abstract "Effects of Numeric Magnitude on the Cortical Valuation Network Frank Kanayet (kanayet.1@osu.edu) Department of Psychology, 255 Psychology Building Columbus, OH 43206 USA John Opfer (opfer.7@osu.edu) Department of Psychology, 245 Psychology Building Columbus, OH 43206 USA William Cunningham (cunningham@psych.utoronto.ca) Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St George St Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 Canada Abstract rewarded just one. A special case of using magnitude for valuation is the use of monetary rewards. By using money, dissimilar goods can be compared on the same scale (e.g., dollars or cents) and can be described with just one value, its numeric magnitude (e.g., +300 or -300). Although translation of value into a numeric scale has many benefits, it may also come with a price. Numeric magnitude, like luminance and loudness, has a compressive psychophysical scale (Fechner, 1860/1966; Weber, 1846/1948; Dehaene, 1997). Thus, the difference between 10 and 15 appears larger than the difference between 120 and 125. The compressive nature of numerical judgments is important because it may play a large role in how the brain tracks monetary value and makes economic decisions (Furlong & Opfer, 2009; Peters et al., 2008). Indeed, “unit effects” on decision-making have been known for many decades. For example, Kahneman and Tversky (1981) observed that participants were willing to trade 20 minutes of their time to save $5 on a $15 calculator, but not on a $125 jacket, even though in both cases they are trading 20 minutes of their time for the same amount of money (i.e. $5). Although, these effects can be explained by assuming that subjects pay more attention to the proportional gains, the compressive function of numeric representations might provide another explanation. Because larger numerals have smaller psychological distances between them, the difference between a $125 and $120 jacket is subjectively less than the difference between a $15 and $10 calculator. In this paper, we were interested in why neural activation also appears to devalue marginal monetary gains. Specifically, we addressed whether the neural response to increasing quantities of money are caused by increases in objective monetary value (the value hypothesis), by increases in the numeric magnitude used to represent the magnitude of the monetary reward (the number hypothesis), both, or neither. This issue is important because neuroeconomists typically assume that the brain areas responsible for processing monetary rewards are not affected by the magnitudes of the numerals that represent the rewards, but this assumption has never been tested. Previous work has identified a distributed, network of neural systems involved in appraising the value of rewards, such as when winning $100. We hypothesized that involvement of intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in this network is specialized for processing numeric rather than monetary value. To test our hypothesis, we manipulated numeric magnitude and units to construct a range of economic rewards (e.g., +$1, +100¢) in response to simple decisions. Consistent with our hypothesis, BOLD activity in IPS was related to changes in numeric magnitude, independent of monetary value, whereas activity in OFC was associated with monetary value, independent of numeric magnitude. Finally, by using representation similarity analysis, we found that the information represented in IPS and OFC was more consistent with the patterns expected if representations of numeric magnitudes or monetary values, respectively, were in a compressive scale. Together, these findings show the importance of numerical cognition for understanding how the brain processes monetary rewards. Keywords: monetary rewards; IPS; OFC; fMRI, representation similarity analysis, numerical cognition Introduction Humans are continuously faced with choices, often involving incommensurable options. When choosing among options for a romantic date, for example, it is not clear how to compare the esthetic pleasure of a movie with the gustatory pleasure of a nice dinner. Making decisions apparently requires computing the value of each option in some way that would register the difference in values (Montague, King-Casas & Cohen, 2006). Economic models have long assumed that humans behave ‘as if’ they compute value for each option in a common mental currency (i.e., subjective value), and experiments on the distributed neural correlates of valuation (i.e., valuation network) suggest that this assumption may be correct (Kable & Glimcher, 2009; Padoa-Schioppa & Asad, 2006, 2008; but see Vlaev, et al., 2011; Tremblay & Schultz, 1999; Seymour et al., 2007; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2005). One of the sources of information that comprise this common mental currency is the magnitude of the reward. Being rewarded two cookies feels better than being" @default.
• W2398255890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2398255890 creator A5033381741 @default.
• W2398255890 creator A5040129015 @default.
• W2398255890 creator A5072330600 @default.
• W2398255890 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2398255890 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2398255890 title "Effects of numeric magnitude on the cortical valuation network" @default.
• W2398255890 cites W1525294281 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W1562703792 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W1989201617 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2001488773 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2001569942 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2004286722 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2009309616 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2020788147 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2025871944 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2043214237 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2047431381 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2058978266 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2069815761 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2096334879 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2096452841 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2107886772 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2117663940 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2122560272 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2126275173 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2128521145 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2130526861 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2133469585 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2140763583 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2157381246 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2160654481 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2166690108 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2171178117 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W2402578595 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W3124589809 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W46219734 @default.
• W2398255890 cites W3021732724 @default.
• W2398255890 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2398255890 type Work @default.
• W2398255890 sameAs 2398255890 @default.
• W2398255890 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2398255890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2398255890 hasAuthorship W2398255890A5033381741 @default.
• W2398255890 hasAuthorship W2398255890A5040129015 @default.
• W2398255890 hasAuthorship W2398255890A5072330600 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C126691448 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C186027771 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConcept C79018884 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C10138342 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C105795698 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C121332964 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C126691448 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C1276947 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C144237770 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C15744967 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C162324750 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C180747234 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C186027771 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C2776291640 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C31972630 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C33923547 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C41008148 @default.
• W2398255890 hasConceptScore W2398255890C79018884 @default.
• W2398255890 hasIssue "35" @default.
• W2398255890 hasLocation W23982558901 @default.
• W2398255890 hasOpenAccess W2398255890 @default.
• W2398255890 hasPrimaryLocation W23982558901 @default.
• W2398255890 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2398255890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2398255890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2398255890 magId "2398255890" @default.
• W2398255890 workType "article" @default.