FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2408892642> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2408892642 endingPage "2531" @default.
• W2408892642 startingPage "2521" @default.
• W2408892642 abstract "Purpose To compare the clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft versus fresh-frozen allograft. Methods Between January 2010 and December 2011, in a prospective randomized study, we included 157 patients who were planned to receive anatomic DB ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft or fresh-frozen allograft. All surgeries were performed by the same senior surgeon with the DB reconstruction technique. The fixation of femoral side grafts was by means of an EndoButton, and the tibial side grafts were fixed with a bioabsorble interference screw augmented with a staple. The same rehabilitation protocol was applied to all the patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at the follow-up points. Evaluations included detailed history, physical examination, radiograph, functional knee ligament testing, KT-2000 arthrometer testing, Harner's vertical jump and Daniel's one-leg hop tests, Lysholm score, Tegner score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) standard evaluation form, and Cincinnati knee score. Results One hundred and twenty-one patients (Auto, 62; Allo, 59) fulfilled complete follow-up and got full clinical evaluations. The mean follow-up was 4.6 years (4.0 to 5.5 years) for both groups. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups according to the evaluations aforementioned except that patients in the Allo group had shorter operation time compared with the Auto group (P = .001). Fifty-three (85.5%) patients in the Auto group and 50 (84.7%) patients in the Allo group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm. Four (6.5%) patients in the Auto group and 4 (6.8%) patients in the Allo group had a side-to-side difference of more than 5 mm. Fifty-nine (95.8%) patients in the Auto group and 55 (93.2%) patients in the Allo group were normal or nearly normal according to the overall IKDC. According to the subjective IKDC, the average scores were 90 and 89 points, respectively, for the Auto and Allo groups. The mean Lysholm and Tegner scores were 90 points and 7.9 points for the Auto group, respectively, and 89 points and 7.8 points for the Allo group, respectively. For the Cincinnati knee score, the average scores were 91 and 90 points, respectively, for the Auto and Allo groups. A total of 11.3% (7 of 62) of patients in the Auto group and 11.9% (7 of 59) of patients in the Allo group had an arthritic progression. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. Conclusions With the anatomic DB ACL reconstruction technique, comparable objective and subjective clinical results can be achieved with the use of a fresh-frozen hamstring tendon allograft compared with an autograft. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective randomized clinical trial. To compare the clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft versus fresh-frozen allograft. Between January 2010 and December 2011, in a prospective randomized study, we included 157 patients who were planned to receive anatomic DB ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft or fresh-frozen allograft. All surgeries were performed by the same senior surgeon with the DB reconstruction technique. The fixation of femoral side grafts was by means of an EndoButton, and the tibial side grafts were fixed with a bioabsorble interference screw augmented with a staple. The same rehabilitation protocol was applied to all the patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at the follow-up points. Evaluations included detailed history, physical examination, radiograph, functional knee ligament testing, KT-2000 arthrometer testing, Harner's vertical jump and Daniel's one-leg hop tests, Lysholm score, Tegner score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) standard evaluation form, and Cincinnati knee score. One hundred and twenty-one patients (Auto, 62; Allo, 59) fulfilled complete follow-up and got full clinical evaluations. The mean follow-up was 4.6 years (4.0 to 5.5 years) for both groups. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups according to the evaluations aforementioned except that patients in the Allo group had shorter operation time compared with the Auto group (P = .001). Fifty-three (85.5%) patients in the Auto group and 50 (84.7%) patients in the Allo group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm. Four (6.5%) patients in the Auto group and 4 (6.8%) patients in the Allo group had a side-to-side difference of more than 5 mm. Fifty-nine (95.8%) patients in the Auto group and 55 (93.2%) patients in the Allo group were normal or nearly normal according to the overall IKDC. According to the subjective IKDC, the average scores were 90 and 89 points, respectively, for the Auto and Allo groups. The mean Lysholm and Tegner scores were 90 points and 7.9 points for the Auto group, respectively, and 89 points and 7.8 points for the Allo group, respectively. For the Cincinnati knee score, the average scores were 91 and 90 points, respectively, for the Auto and Allo groups. A total of 11.3% (7 of 62) of patients in the Auto group and 11.9% (7 of 59) of patients in the Allo group had an arthritic progression. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. With the anatomic DB ACL reconstruction technique, comparable objective and subjective clinical results can be achieved with the use of a fresh-frozen hamstring tendon allograft compared with an autograft." @default.
• W2408892642 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5010072636 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5032793953 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5033732336 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5064757743 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5087028608 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5090194343 @default.
• W2408892642 creator A5090603786 @default.
• W2408892642 date "2016-12-01" @default.
• W2408892642 modified "2023-10-08" @default.
• W2408892642 title "Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Fresh-Frozen Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study" @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1786074186 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1953114360 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1972363415 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1976728079 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1976827045 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1978303393 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1978969036 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1987477782 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W1995247255 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2005225321 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2005814820 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2014701412 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2030611298 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2031124407 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2031386650 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2032273454 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2032305369 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2039235017 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2042454600 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2053215919 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2053750011 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2060067686 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2063672329 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2067473104 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2073728503 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2076122281 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2089401615 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2090018949 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2094316481 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2094498389 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2102537645 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2109085343 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2117878938 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2125983406 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2127085795 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2134221737 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2135355762 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2137882521 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2141827797 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2143617465 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2148365602 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2158287351 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2161083466 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2163591061 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2163637237 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2175073312 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W2278913646 @default.
• W2408892642 cites W4245083700 @default.
• W2408892642 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.013" @default.
• W2408892642 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27289276" @default.
• W2408892642 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2408892642 type Work @default.
• W2408892642 sameAs 2408892642 @default.
• W2408892642 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422017 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422018 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422019 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422020 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422021 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422022 @default.
• W2408892642 countsByYear W24088926422023 @default.
• W2408892642 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5010072636 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5032793953 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5033732336 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5064757743 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5087028608 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5090194343 @default.
• W2408892642 hasAuthorship W2408892642A5090603786 @default.
• W2408892642 hasBestOaLocation W24088926421 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C2776141760 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C141071460 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C146249460 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C2776141760 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C2778434673 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C2780887989 @default.
• W2408892642 hasConceptScore W2408892642C2908647359 @default.

• next