FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2409682952> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2409682952 endingPage "71" @default.
• W2409682952 startingPage "68" @default.
• W2409682952 abstract "Early detection with screening mammography can potentially reduce breast cancer mortality rates. To achieve an efficient screening, a peer review system provides a compensatory double-check reviewing, will hopefully to prevent the omission of detectable lesions and reduce unnecessary recall.In 2009, 4643 initial mammographic screenings reported by 74 screening radiologists had negative results with a recall rate of less than 5%. In the same year, 2538 initial positives screened by 18 screening radiologists had a recall rate higher than 15%. Those 7181 randomized screenings were evenly distributed for reassessment by 39 reviewing radiologists. The disagreement of assessments between the reviewers and screening radiologists was recorded. The differential rate was defined as the number of the disagreements divided by the number of audited films reviewed by a screening radiologist. The equality of the differential rates for each screening radiologists with negative and positive assessments was compared by a Chi-square test. The performance of the 39 auditors was measured by the Kendall's tau statistic. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.The mean differential rate for screening radiologists of negative assessments was 6.7% (P = 0.588), while 35.0% for positive assessments were significant (P < 0.001). The result indicated that most of the initial negative assessments reported by the screening radiologists were generally accepted by the reviewers but not the positive assessments. With respect to the 39 reviewers, there was no significant evidence for the association of the difference rates between negative and positive assessments. Nine reviewers were found to have their differential rate for negative and positive assessments larger than the average of the population. Eleven reviewers were found to have their differential rates smaller than the average for both. Thirteen reviewers had their differential rates smaller than the average for negative assessments but larger than the average for positive assessments. The opposite condition was found for six reviewers. The Kendall's tau statistic was 0.038 (P = 0.735).Reviewers usually agreed with the opinion of the initial screening doctors who reported negative findings. Therefore, a 5% recall rate as the lower range of reviewing negatives may be still too high. The recall rate of more than 15% was significantly related to improper interpretation, especially when the differential rate is 25% or higher, a warning to the underperforming screening radiologist is recommended. An ideal reviewer should interpret films independently. Reviewers with tendencies to be followers or contrarians should not be enrolled in the reviewing system." @default.
• W2409682952 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5002704093 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5006321114 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5033433664 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5041904851 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5042525572 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5042626658 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5050203786 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5074435817 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5079577597 @default.
• W2409682952 creator A5080675011 @default.
• W2409682952 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2409682952 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2409682952 title "Peer reviewing of screening mammography in Taiwan: its reliability and the improvement." @default.
• W2409682952 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23286480" @default.
• W2409682952 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2409682952 type Work @default.
• W2409682952 sameAs 2409682952 @default.
• W2409682952 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2409682952 countsByYear W24096829522014 @default.
• W2409682952 countsByYear W24096829522018 @default.
• W2409682952 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5002704093 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5006321114 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5033433664 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5041904851 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5042525572 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5042626658 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5050203786 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5074435817 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5079577597 @default.
• W2409682952 hasAuthorship W2409682952A5080675011 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C2909814700 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C2985394991 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C2987098735 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C2989486834 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C64869954 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConcept C95922358 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C100660578 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C105795698 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C121608353 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C126322002 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C126838900 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C154945302 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C15744967 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C162324750 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C180747234 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C187736073 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C19527891 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C199521495 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C2780472235 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C2909814700 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C2985394991 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C2987098735 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C2989486834 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C33923547 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C41008148 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C530470458 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C64869954 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C71924100 @default.
• W2409682952 hasConceptScore W2409682952C95922358 @default.
• W2409682952 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2409682952 hasLocation W24096829521 @default.
• W2409682952 hasOpenAccess W2409682952 @default.
• W2409682952 hasPrimaryLocation W24096829521 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W154473579 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W1557094818 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W1855159681 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2070787551 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2102662693 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2112731922 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2409682952 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2586110918 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W2951146195 @default.
• W2409682952 hasRelatedWork W3123215897 @default.
• W2409682952 hasVolume "126" @default.
• W2409682952 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2409682952 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2409682952 magId "2409682952" @default.
• W2409682952 workType "article" @default.