FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2410007527> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2410007527 endingPage "360" @default.
• W2410007527 startingPage "344" @default.
• W2410007527 abstract "Behavioral aspects of spatial competition between red wood ants (Formica aquilonia) and six mass species of Carabidae were studied in field and laboratory experiments. We showed that red wood ants essentially influence spatial distribution of ground beetles on their common territories. Transplantation experiments suggest that in newly established ants' settlements stronger forms of interrelations arise than in old stable colony. To examine the ability of beetles to avoid collisions with ants we used two experimental techniques. In laboratory, we tested carabids ability to avoid a clash in a Y-shaped labyrinth containing an active tethered ant in one section. In field experiments we compared quantitative characteristics of movements (such as crookedness of individual trajectories, speed of movement, the time spent on stops) for beetles placed close to ants foraging routes and on ant-free plots. All beetles studied displayed a clear tendency to learn, that is, to modity their behavior in order to avoid collisions with ants. Species that exhibited best parameters of learning were closer to ants by their size and characteristic movement, namely, Pterostichus oblogopunctatus and P. magus. Beetles' stereotyped behavioral tactics can be considered universal for avoiding collisions with any subject (for instance, with an ant) of a certain size and speed of movements. A set of tactics in the labyrinth included: (1) attempts to round the ant; (2) turns away after touching the ant with antennae; (3) turns away without a contact; (4) avoidances of a dangerous section; (5) stops near the ant with the antennae hidden. Comparing pairwise difference between four species shows that beetles use species-specific preference for definite combinations of tactics. Effective learning allows carabids to penetrate into ant foraging territory and partly avoide interference competition. It seems that red wood ants are not inclined to learn to avoid collisions with competing carabid species. Instead, they recognize an enemy's image and selectively attack relatively small predatory carabids rather than herbivorous species. Experiments with dummy beetles suggest that ants react for several hierarchically organized key characteristics of competitors such as speed of movement, dark color, bilateral symmetry, protuberances (legs, antennae), and smell. Among professional groups in ant family, guards and hunters react to beetles aggressively, whereas aphid tenders ignore them. Sophisticated combination of flexible and innate behavioral patterns enables insects to share territories and interact in the mode of relatively mild, spatial, competition instead of predation. Eliciting sets of hierarchically organized features of competitors that govern adjustment of spatial distribution in insects' community enable us to integrate ideas of classic and cognitive ethology." @default.
• W2410007527 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2410007527 creator A5009590931 @default.
• W2410007527 creator A5037347952 @default.
• W2410007527 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W2410007527 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2410007527 title "Behavioral mechanisms of spatial competition between red wood ants (Formica aquilonia) and ground beetles (Carabidae)" @default.
• W2410007527 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17100097" @default.
• W2410007527 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2410007527 type Work @default.
• W2410007527 sameAs 2410007527 @default.
• W2410007527 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2410007527 countsByYear W24100075272017 @default.
• W2410007527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2410007527 hasAuthorship W2410007527A5009590931 @default.
• W2410007527 hasAuthorship W2410007527A5037347952 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConcept C165287380 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConcept C97467695 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConceptScore W2410007527C165287380 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConceptScore W2410007527C18903297 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConceptScore W2410007527C86803240 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConceptScore W2410007527C91306197 @default.
• W2410007527 hasConceptScore W2410007527C97467695 @default.
• W2410007527 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2410007527 hasLocation W24100075271 @default.
• W2410007527 hasLocation W24100075272 @default.
• W2410007527 hasOpenAccess W2410007527 @default.
• W2410007527 hasPrimaryLocation W24100075271 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1468720841 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1571178879 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1599187382 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1957138058 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1965191606 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W1989652878 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2001324388 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2007802495 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2009854313 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2047965796 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2062754565 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2126329804 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2152305023 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2312979748 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2419480517 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2808181354 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2896332059 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2901593677 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W3156895246 @default.
• W2410007527 hasRelatedWork W2187505260 @default.
• W2410007527 hasVolume "67" @default.
• W2410007527 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2410007527 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2410007527 magId "2410007527" @default.
• W2410007527 workType "article" @default.