FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2411663642> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2411663642 abstract "Background While verifying the dosage and pharmaceutical form, the pharmacist also has to check the correct compilation of the prescription. Dispensing the first cycle of therapy at discharge, the hospital pharmacist should always verify whether the physician has correctly completed all fields of the prescription. Agenzia Italiana FArmaco (AIFA) developed a tool to simplify this process: a set of’ ‘notes’, initially conceived as an instrument for government expenditure on pharmaceuticals that is now a means of ensuring the pertinent use of drugs. Purpose To evaluate both the characteristics of the population to whom the prescription is addressed and the respective prescription, paying attention to errors/gap in AIFA notes. We also evaluated the number of prescriptions containing drugs out of the hospital formulary (FN) and drugs not reimbursed by the National Health Service (C drugs). Material and methods This retrospective study was performed to evaluate discharge prescriptions from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2014 to obtain data about the patient (sex, age) and the use of AIFA note methodology. The evaluated units were cardiology, rehabilitation, neurology and medicine. Results Our pharmacists dispensed about 90 active principles and the drugs distributed most frequently were enoxaparine (15%), pantoprazole (11%) and ramipril (7%). We analysed 833 prescriptions, 471 for men and 362 for women. The average age obtained from the prescription was 72.50 years (70.65 for men, 74.35 for women). 349 prescriptions (41.90%) contained active ingredients that do not need AIFA notes and 373 contained the right notes. The prescriptions with incorrect or incomplete notes were 110, respectively, 11.64% (97) and 1.56% (13). The most frequently incorrect notes concerned proton pump inhibitors (note 1 and 48, 53.61%) and cholesterol lowering drugs (note 13, 11.34%). 130 prescriptions contained FN drugs (15.61%), of which 53 (40.77%) were C drugs. Conclusion This analysis shows how physicians’ prescribing could be improved; 13.20% of prescriptions had wrong or incomplete notes. The study also underlines an increase in the number of prescriptions containing C drugs, highlighting the need for better information about the formulary to physicians. References and/or Acknowledgements Legge 16 November 2001, p. 405 http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/it/content/note-aifa No conflict of interest." @default.
• W2411663642 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2411663642 creator A5016512501 @default.
• W2411663642 creator A5024003760 @default.
• W2411663642 creator A5040901367 @default.
• W2411663642 creator A5047625088 @default.
• W2411663642 creator A5081586194 @default.
• W2411663642 date "2016-02-14" @default.
• W2411663642 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2411663642 title "PS-033 Physicians’ utilisation of aifa notes: A retrospective study in the medical area" @default.
• W2411663642 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000875.517" @default.
• W2411663642 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2411663642 type Work @default.
• W2411663642 sameAs 2411663642 @default.
• W2411663642 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2411663642 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2411663642 hasAuthorship W2411663642A5016512501 @default.
• W2411663642 hasAuthorship W2411663642A5024003760 @default.
• W2411663642 hasAuthorship W2411663642A5040901367 @default.
• W2411663642 hasAuthorship W2411663642A5047625088 @default.
• W2411663642 hasAuthorship W2411663642A5081586194 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C100406419 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C2779457091 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C100406419 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C104863432 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C159110408 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C187212893 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C2426938 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C2779457091 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C2908647359 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C512399662 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C71924100 @default.
• W2411663642 hasConceptScore W2411663642C99454951 @default.
• W2411663642 hasLocation W24116636421 @default.
• W2411663642 hasOpenAccess W2411663642 @default.
• W2411663642 hasPrimaryLocation W24116636421 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W191796525 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W1926303018 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2089558851 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2319300114 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2329239525 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2354749125 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2354948943 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2357035961 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2360332748 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2381727436 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2387117744 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2611217326 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2618038050 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2995896885 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W3029321569 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W3139506768 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W3152219422 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2182338680 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2184384144 @default.
• W2411663642 hasRelatedWork W2992609712 @default.
• W2411663642 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2411663642 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2411663642 magId "2411663642" @default.
• W2411663642 workType "article" @default.