FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2413821280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2413821280 abstract "Introduction The management and counselling of patients with polyp cancers can be technically challenging. Whilst identifying those at risk of residual or recurrent disease is important, it is undesirable to undertake potentially morbid resectional surgery when the risk of residual disease or recurrence is low. The aim of this study was to identify factors, which could better predict recurrence, thereby directing high-risk patients towards surgical resection and managing low-risk patients expectantly. Method A retrospective review identified 282 polyp cancers from the South East Scotland Cancer Network over a 10-year period from 2003 to 2013). Data collected were polyp cancer pathology, follow up-period, disease-free survival and management strategy. All patients were discussed through the colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team and had endoscopic and radiological assessment. Results Of the 282 polyp cancers identified, 85 (30.1%) underwent resectional surgery, 27 (9.6%) trans-endoscopic microsurgery and 195 (65.6%) had no further immediate treatment. This resulted in 222 patients on a watchful wait surveillance pathway. Median follow-up was 30.5 months for the watchful waiting group (range 1–97), 28 months for the resectional group (range 1–88). Overall, median follow up was 33 months (range 1–97). The most common reason for resectional surgery was an involved margin or adverse pathology. The overall median polyp size was 20mm (range 5–60 mm). In resectional surgery group, 91.2% had no residual disease, 8.8% had mural involvement, 7.7% nodal involvement and 4.4% had both. There was no 30-day mortality and morbidity was 16.1%. There were no local recurrences, 5 (5.9%) had distant recurrence, and 2 (2.4%) nodal recurrence. In the watchful wait group, 9 (4.1%) developed recurrence of which 5 underwent surgery and remain disease- free; the remainder were medically unfit for surgery. Conclusion There were no recurrences in patients without adverse pathology (i.e. vascular invasion, high-grade dysplasia), where resection margins were >1 mm and both cross -sectional imaging and repeat endoscopy were clear. The majority of patients who had resectional surgery had no residual disease (>90%). Our data suggests favourable pathology but a close margin does not always mandate surgery and we have subsequently changed practise for these patients. Disclosure of interest None Declared." @default.
• W2413821280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5016100282 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5019678054 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5021215544 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5025143812 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5034654485 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5061608790 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5067083918 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5068141845 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5077284294 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5083322488 @default.
• W2413821280 creator A5083831983 @default.
• W2413821280 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W2413821280 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2413821280 title "PWE-322 Are we over-treating polyp cancers?" @default.
• W2413821280 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.768" @default.
• W2413821280 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2413821280 type Work @default.
• W2413821280 sameAs 2413821280 @default.
• W2413821280 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2413821280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5016100282 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5019678054 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5021215544 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5025143812 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5034654485 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5061608790 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5067083918 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5068141845 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5077284294 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5083322488 @default.
• W2413821280 hasAuthorship W2413821280A5083831983 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C190892606 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C2776141087 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C121608353 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C126322002 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C141071460 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C190892606 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C2776141087 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C2779134260 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C2780192828 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C526805850 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C61434518 @default.
• W2413821280 hasConceptScore W2413821280C71924100 @default.
• W2413821280 hasLocation W24138212801 @default.
• W2413821280 hasOpenAccess W2413821280 @default.
• W2413821280 hasPrimaryLocation W24138212801 @default.
• W2413821280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2413821280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2413821280 magId "2413821280" @default.
• W2413821280 workType "article" @default.