Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2414172868> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2414172868 abstract "During the 1970s many Western analysts of Chinese socialism employed the Communist Party of China's (CPC) notion of a struggle between two lines to describe two distinctive and opposite models of development: the 'Maoist' model designed to continue socialist transition and the 'Liuist' model designed to restore capitalism. Though relying closely on the CPC's own official formulations, this method of analysis marked a significant step forward in our understanding of Chinese socialism. It focussed attention firmly on the theoretical and policy conflicts brought into the open by the Cultural Revolution. But the post-Mao leadership's negation of the Cultural Revolution has cast serious doubt on the accuracy of conclusions arising out of 'two-line stuggle' analysis, and on the validity of the analysis itself. Western analysts have had to rethink their positions. Thus in recent times the limitations of 'two-line struggle' analysis have been pointed out. First, the theoretical and policy conflicts characteristic of Chinese socialism are not amenable to a simple 'two-line struggle' classification, and while attention is focussed on conflict, strong elements of continuity are often ignored. Secondly, this oversimplification of issues is also apparent in the reduction of disagreement to questions of line struggle, ignoring questions of functional and organisational differences in policy formulation and implementation.' Thirdly, a number of conclusions about different periods of revolutionary history are either misleading or wrong, especially the claim that Mao Zedong and Liu Shaoqi always opposed each other.2 Finally, 'two-line struggle' analysis quickly became an ideological construct. It was used to obscure rather than clarify theoretical and policy disputes, especially when employed in China as an instrument of political abuse. It also rests to a large extent on the belief in a 'correct' socialist road in opposition to an 'incorrect' capitalist road; or more specifically, Mao's socialist road and Liu's capitalist road. This belief cannot be accepted" @default.
- W2414172868 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2414172868 creator A5016880174 @default.
- W2414172868 date "1982-07-01" @default.
- W2414172868 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2414172868 title "Louis T. Sigel and `Two-Line Struggle' Analysis: The Myth of the `Objective Standard of Socialism'" @default.
- W2414172868 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/2158926" @default.
- W2414172868 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
- W2414172868 type Work @default.
- W2414172868 sameAs 2414172868 @default.
- W2414172868 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2414172868 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2414172868 hasAuthorship W2414172868A5016880174 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C501299471 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C514928085 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C542948173 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C111472728 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C118084267 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C138885662 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C138921699 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C144024400 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C158071213 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C162324750 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C17744445 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C191935318 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C199539241 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C501299471 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C514928085 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C542948173 @default.
- W2414172868 hasConceptScore W2414172868C94625758 @default.
- W2414172868 hasLocation W24141728681 @default.
- W2414172868 hasOpenAccess W2414172868 @default.
- W2414172868 hasPrimaryLocation W24141728681 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W1500850877 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2001460859 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2010469721 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2019867470 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2029942746 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2068703481 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2112961225 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2124163681 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2132941046 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2319537560 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2319612230 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2372901998 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2381233611 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2476261853 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2510847570 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2901124 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W2964364281 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W3041167196 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W3150971644 @default.
- W2414172868 hasRelatedWork W569071912 @default.
- W2414172868 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2414172868 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2414172868 magId "2414172868" @default.
- W2414172868 workType "article" @default.