FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2414493496> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2414493496 endingPage "985" @default.
• W2414493496 startingPage "971" @default.
• W2414493496 abstract "In recent years there has been growing concern about greenhouse gas emissions (particularly CO2 emissions) and global warming. Oxyfuel combustion is one of the key technologies for tackling CO2 emissions in the power industry and reducing their contribution to global warming. The technology involves burning fuel with high-purity oxygen to generate mainly CO2 and steam, enabling easy CO2 separation from the flue gases by steam condensation. In fact, 100% CO2 capture and near-zero NOx emissions can be achieved with this technology. This study examines nineteen different oxy-turbine cycles, identifying the main parameters regarding their operation and development. It also analyses the use of advanced natural gas (NG) combustion cycles from the point of view of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) and considering political, legislative and social aspects of deploying this technology. Six oxy-turbine cycles which are at the most advanced stages of development (NetPower, Clean Energy Systems CES), Modified Graz, E-MATIANT, Advanced Zero Emission Power AZEP 100% and Semi-Closed Oxy-fuel Combustion Combined Cycle (SCOC-CC)), were chosen to conduct a Political, Environmental, Social, Technological, Legislative and Economic (PESTLE) risk analysis. This compares each technology with a conventional combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant without carbon capture as the base-case scenario. Overall, the net efficiency of the different oxy-turbine cycles ranges between 43.6% and 65%, comparable to a CCGT power plant, while providing the extra benefits of CO2 capture and lower emissions. A multi-criteria analysis carried out using DECERNS (Decision Evaluation in Complex Risk Network Systems) software determined that, depending on the specific criterion considered, one can draw different conclusions. However, in terms of technology, environment and social opinion, the most promising cycles are the NetPower and CES cycles, whereas from an economic point of view, E-MATIANT is more competitive in the energy market. Giving each factor equal importance, the NetPower cycle must be considered to be the best oxy-turbine cycle based on our analysis. Most of the oxy-turbine cycles are still under development and only a few cycles (e.g., CES and NetPower) are progressing to the demonstration phase. In consequence, political measures such as CO2 tax and emission allowances need to be implemented for oxy-turbine technologies to become the preferred option for fossil fuel power plants burning natural gas." @default.
• W2414493496 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2414493496 creator A5011499019 @default.
• W2414493496 creator A5012769739 @default.
• W2414493496 creator A5048783471 @default.
• W2414493496 creator A5087295178 @default.
• W2414493496 creator A5089317030 @default.
• W2414493496 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2414493496 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2414493496 title "A technical evaluation, performance analysis and risk assessment of multiple novel oxy-turbine power cycles with complete CO2 capture" @default.
• W2414493496 cites W1896739983 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W1975082556 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W1984541710 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W1986663656 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2001577351 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2002143541 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2004248342 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2007931723 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2011637971 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2027509750 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2028823221 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2037979331 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2041637634 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2046714275 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2063850521 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2064146261 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2071582555 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2072069485 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2076333087 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2077012231 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2081680239 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2082350277 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2090822958 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2093700835 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2094655654 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2114248685 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2119542915 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2124967344 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2152848642 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2163668413 @default.
• W2414493496 cites W2165125253 @default.
• W2414493496 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.189" @default.
• W2414493496 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2414493496 type Work @default.
• W2414493496 sameAs 2414493496 @default.
• W2414493496 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962016 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962017 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962018 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962019 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962020 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962021 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962022 @default.
• W2414493496 countsByYear W24144934962023 @default.
• W2414493496 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2414493496 hasAuthorship W2414493496A5011499019 @default.
• W2414493496 hasAuthorship W2414493496A5012769739 @default.
• W2414493496 hasAuthorship W2414493496A5048783471 @default.
• W2414493496 hasAuthorship W2414493496A5087295178 @default.
• W2414493496 hasAuthorship W2414493496A5089317030 @default.
• W2414493496 hasBestOaLocation W24144934962 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C105923489 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C110910425 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C118334743 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C14794904 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C167206829 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C21880701 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C2778379663 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C2778449969 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C423512 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C4311470 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C47737302 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C105923489 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C110910425 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C118334743 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C119599485 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C121332964 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C127413603 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C132651083 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C134560507 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C14794904 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C162324750 @default.
• W2414493496 hasConceptScore W2414493496C163258240 @default.

• next